Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 23, 2016 at 4:41 pm
(November 23, 2016 at 2:31 pm)The Joker Wrote: A Mindless Dumb Natural Proccess(Dominos) Can't keep Proccesing(Dominos falling) and Proccessing(falling) There most be an end. There most obviously be a paranormal, any idiot can work that out.
An idiot did.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 7167
Threads: 12
Joined: March 14, 2013
Reputation:
72
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 23, 2016 at 4:57 pm
(November 23, 2016 at 1:55 pm)The Joker Wrote: The Cosmological Argument proves God.
If it does, then you should either be very disappointed or very afraid.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould
Posts: 3297
Threads: 179
Joined: April 29, 2012
Reputation:
24
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 24, 2016 at 11:42 am
The meek shall inherit the Earth, the rest of us will fly to the stars.
Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups
Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in mud ..... after a while you realise that the pig likes it!
Posts: 7392
Threads: 53
Joined: January 15, 2015
Reputation:
88
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 24, 2016 at 11:59 am
(This post was last modified: November 24, 2016 at 11:59 am by I_am_not_mafia.)
"But that's microevolution!" coming in:
5
...
4
...
3
...
2
...
1
...
Posts: 46511
Threads: 543
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 24, 2016 at 12:10 pm
Someone (may have been Gould, I'm not sure) explained the non-difference between micro- and macroevolution like this:
Suppose you close your eyes and walk ten steps. When you open your eyes, the scene around you will appear largely the same. There will be a few tiny differences - that tree will be a tad closer, you may be standing on a grassy patch instead of a sandy one, and so on. Close your eyes again, and walk 100 steps. You'll open your eyes to a scene yet more different from your starting point. Close your eyes and walk a thousand steps, then a million steps, then one billion steps. All of those tiny differences have accumulated until your environment is completely different, and nothing looks like it did when you started out.
It's a flawed and incomplete analogy, to be sure (all analogies are), but the gist is correct - macroevolution is the result of accumulated microevolution. To accept the former while denying the latter is to miss the point entirely. If you accept that microevolution occurs, you are implicitly acknowledging the fact of macroevolution.
This is one of the things that makes creationists very stupid people.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 2292
Threads: 16
Joined: September 28, 2015
Reputation:
24
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 24, 2016 at 12:20 pm
(This post was last modified: November 24, 2016 at 12:21 pm by ApeNotKillApe.)
Another analogy (not mine) is it's like saying a car driving at 60mph can't travel 120 miles in 2 hours.
I am John Cena's hip-hop album.
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 24, 2016 at 12:24 pm
Quote:If you're going to parrot Ken Ham, at least have the decency to cite the source.
Actually if you are going to parrot Ken Ham at least have the decency to kill yourself. You are too stupid to live.
Posts: 206
Threads: 6
Joined: November 17, 2016
Reputation:
1
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 24, 2016 at 2:43 pm
(This post was last modified: November 24, 2016 at 2:53 pm by The Joker.)
Quote:Kids are taught that life can evolve given enough time. This is a false statement without any scientific support.
They are taught that if given enough time, a monkey at a typewriter could punch keys at random and eventually type President's Abraham Lincoln Gettysburg Address. This is nonsense.
Time does not make impossible things possible. As an example, a computer was programmed in an attempt to arrive at the simple 26-letter alphabet. After 35,000,000,000,000 (35 trillion) attempts it has only arrived at 14 letters correctly.
What are the odds that a simple single cell organism could evolve given the complexity of more than 60,000 proteins of 100 different configurations all in the correct places? Never in eternity! Time does not make impossible things possible.
Source: http://humansarefree.com/2013/12/9-scien...ry-of.html
Quote:RozKek Wrote:
[url=http://atheistforums.org/post-1455274.html#pid1455274][/url]Joker, you're allowed to post(exceptions to 30/30).... as long as it's relevant to the discussion.
You need to be honest and see both sides of the argument, see why evolution is false.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 24, 2016 at 2:50 pm
Unsupported assertions are the farts of the apologist agenda. All stink and no substance.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 206
Threads: 6
Joined: November 17, 2016
Reputation:
1
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 24, 2016 at 3:07 pm
(This post was last modified: November 24, 2016 at 3:09 pm by The Joker.)
(November 23, 2016 at 10:47 am)RozKek Wrote: Joker, you're allowed to post(exceptions to 30/30).... as long as it's relevant to the discussion.
(November 24, 2016 at 12:24 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Quote:If you're going to parrot Ken Ham, at least have the decency to cite the source.
Actually if you are going to parrot Ken Ham at least have the decency to kill yourself. You are too stupid to live.
Ken Ham is no fool, he is the Speaker, Author, President, CEO, and Founder of Answers in Genesis.
|
