Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 31, 2026, 4:04 pm
Thread Rating:
|
This Is What We Lose When Breitbart Takes Over the NSC
|
|
I seem to recall that he just wants pictures and charts, anyway. Maybe his handlers are simpler than we previously thought?
If you get to thinking you’re a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else’s dog around.
They probably just hand him pictures of things with "good" and "bad" stamped on them...
Putin "Good" Australia "Bad" Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni: "You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???" (February 20, 2017 at 9:35 pm)Fireball Wrote: I seem to recall that he just wants pictures and charts, anyway. Maybe his handlers are simpler than we previously thought? Trump can barely read so that makes sense. “Understanding is a three edged sword: your side, their side, and the truth.”
Chasing away talent is a sure sign of shitty management.
(February 23, 2017 at 10:54 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote:(February 23, 2017 at 10:46 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Chasing away talent is a sure sign of shitty management. I'm unsure why you quoted me in making your point, which has nothing to do with mine.
Looks causally related to me.
Chasing away talent -> poor quality government is your assertion. His assertion is that the GOP's control has led to many things, amongst them is chasing away talent, and that it's the fault of the country for doing so. Slave to the Patriarchy no more
RE: This Is What We Lose When Breitbart Takes Over the NSC
February 24, 2017 at 2:20 pm
(This post was last modified: February 24, 2017 at 2:21 pm by Thumpalumpacus.)
(February 24, 2017 at 1:42 pm)Moros Synackaon Wrote: Chasing away talent -> poor quality government is your assertion. No. My point is that a talented manager attracts talent to surround them. And the corollary is that is talented folks are leaving, the manager may wish to re-examine his or her approach to leadership. Now, it can be argued that the quality of governance thereafter falls, and oftentimes it does. But bureaucracies have a way of evening out these things. And, I'm not so sure that leadership separates upon partisan lines. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



