Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature?
March 4, 2017 at 9:51 am
(This post was last modified: March 4, 2017 at 9:53 am by Alex K.)
(March 4, 2017 at 9:43 am)bennyboy Wrote: All this understanding of "almost everything," and I still can't understand whether my wife wants me to turn left or right. 
Parity violation is a whole different can of worms!
Who doesn't know thesr discussions, TURN AS THE SPIN OF THE NEUTRINO IS ALIGNED IN BETA DECAYS OF THIS AND THIS TYPE!!!
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 7259
Threads: 506
Joined: December 12, 2015
Reputation:
22
RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature?
March 4, 2017 at 10:44 am
(March 4, 2017 at 9:11 am)Alex K Wrote: And he's correct. The effects of the cutoff play basically no role in describing the physics behind what goes on around us - it's a Theory of almost everything, as someone put it once.
Perfect, love it! The Theory of Almost Everything as opposed to the "Core Theory". Someone needs to fix the tee-shirts:
![[Image: core-theory-tee-shirt.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.preposterousuniverse.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F09%2Fcore-theory-tee-shirt.jpg)
Posts: 19789
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature?
March 4, 2017 at 11:09 am
(March 4, 2017 at 9:51 am)Alex K Wrote: (March 4, 2017 at 9:43 am)bennyboy Wrote: All this understanding of "almost everything," and I still can't understand whether my wife wants me to turn left or right.
Parity violation is a whole different can of worms!
Who doesn't know thesr discussions, TURN AS THE SPIN OF THE NEUTRINO IS ALIGNED IN BETA DECAYS OF THIS AND THIS TYPE!!!
Pretty sure parity is nonconserved. Professors yang was always wrong, while his wife always right.
Posts: 30129
Threads: 304
Joined: April 18, 2014
Reputation:
92
RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature?
March 4, 2017 at 12:43 pm
(March 4, 2017 at 6:38 am)Jehanne Wrote: Has basic Science now ended? In other words, are QED (Quantum Electrodynamics), QCD and General Relativity basically complete theories and there really is no hope of anything beyond those? Or, will String Theory, M Theory, or some successor theory unite all theories into something even greater, something that leads to testable predictions? Or, as Sean Carroll says, does it even matter:
![[Image: Everyday-Equation.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.preposterousuniverse.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F01%2FEveryday-Equation.jpg)
Ahem.
This equation does not allow for flightless waterfowl.
![[Image: 83a97ddaf13f9e32d74fe3d2c19eba28.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com%2F736x%2F83%2Fa9%2F7d%2F83a97ddaf13f9e32d74fe3d2c19eba28.jpg)
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
Posts: 19789
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature?
March 4, 2017 at 12:52 pm
(This post was last modified: March 4, 2017 at 12:57 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(March 4, 2017 at 12:43 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: (March 4, 2017 at 6:38 am)Jehanne Wrote: Has basic Science now ended? In other words, are QED (Quantum Electrodynamics), QCD and General Relativity basically complete theories and there really is no hope of anything beyond those? Or, will String Theory, M Theory, or some successor theory unite all theories into something even greater, something that leads to testable predictions? Or, as Sean Carroll says, does it even matter:
Ahem.
This equation does not allow for flightless waterfowl.
The opus term was dropped when it was found to be aesthetically displeasing to the string theorists because it threaten to produce testable local predictions in bloom county.
Posts: 5356
Threads: 178
Joined: June 28, 2015
Reputation:
35
RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature?
March 4, 2017 at 1:27 pm
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature?
March 4, 2017 at 2:13 pm
(This post was last modified: March 4, 2017 at 2:14 pm by Alex K.)
(March 4, 2017 at 11:09 am)Anomalocaris Wrote: (March 4, 2017 at 9:51 am)Alex K Wrote: Parity violation is a whole different can of worms!
Who doesn't know thesr discussions, TURN AS THE SPIN OF THE NEUTRINO IS ALIGNED IN BETA DECAYS OF THIS AND THIS TYPE!!!
Pretty sure parity is nonconserved. Professors yang was always wrong, while his wife always right. His wife is 45 years younger. He must be doing *something* right.
I once filled out my tax forms in C.N. Yang's office, true story!
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 7259
Threads: 506
Joined: December 12, 2015
Reputation:
22
RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature?
March 4, 2017 at 2:24 pm
(March 4, 2017 at 2:13 pm)Alex K Wrote: (March 4, 2017 at 11:09 am)Anomalocaris Wrote: Pretty sure parity is nonconserved. Professors yang was always wrong, while his wife always right. His wife is 45 years younger. He must be doing *something* right.
I once filled out my tax forms in C.N. Yang's office, true story!
Just think, Alex, in another universe (or, perhaps, another part of this one), there is another "me" and "you" who are getting invited to all the cool parities, meeting all of the hot women, etc, etc.
Posts: 30129
Threads: 304
Joined: April 18, 2014
Reputation:
92
RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature?
March 4, 2017 at 4:17 pm
and an analog of your vorlon is right now getting fisted to the elbow by Brett Favre . . . .
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature?
March 4, 2017 at 5:58 pm
(This post was last modified: March 4, 2017 at 5:58 pm by Alex K.)
(March 4, 2017 at 4:17 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: and an analog of your vorlon is right now getting fisted to the elbow by Brett Favre . . . .
And then there's that infamous parallel universe where I'm fisting vorlon while Jehanne is discussing parity violation with Brett Favre. It collapsed itself into a black hole soon after, or so I've heard.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
|
