Posts: 28337
Threads: 524
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
90
RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature?
April 10, 2017 at 7:54 am
(This post was last modified: April 10, 2017 at 12:09 pm by Cyberman.)
(April 10, 2017 at 3:08 am)henryy123 Wrote: hi
belief or should one say the illusion that we could describe the world or at least the part of the world without any reference to ourselves this is actually possible to a large extent. we know that the city of Delhi exist whether we it or not.
[snip]
What the hell is that link for?
Administrator NoticeSame thing as quoting it. To make my day more colourful... (
) -- Cyberman
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
Posts: 30726
Threads: 2123
Joined: May 24, 2012
Reputation:
71
RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature?
April 10, 2017 at 8:11 am
QM is pointing to really freaky stuff, none of which requires plopping in magic wizards as gap answers.
Posts: 8731
Threads: 425
Joined: October 7, 2014
Reputation:
37
RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature?
April 10, 2017 at 11:14 am
well we have to keep looking down into smaller and smaller particles until we cannot find anything
but i wouldn't be surprised if there is something smaller than a tetraquark. We have good grasp of how it ties together
but as far as a complete description yet no i don't think were that close yet but were a lot better off now at finding it than 60 to 60+ years ago.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>
