Posts: 46468
Threads: 543
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Bill Maher Discusses The Lesser of Two Evils
May 7, 2017 at 12:56 am
(This post was last modified: May 7, 2017 at 12:58 am by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(May 6, 2017 at 11:01 pm)Jehanne Wrote: (May 6, 2017 at 7:29 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Trump and Clinton aside, I absolutely, positively cannot stand Bill Maher.
Boru
No one's perfect; I heard that he was a speed writer for LBJ, and he sneaked one of the first mentions of climate change into one of LBJ's State of the Union speeches.
Sounds a bit tricky, as Maher would have been about 13 when LBJ left office.
Boru
(May 7, 2017 at 12:00 am)Crunchy Wrote: I like Maher.
His point in this instance is bang on and it actually applies to others besides Clinton. I find too many liberals are looking for perfection in their public representatives. You can be 99% liberal but disagree on one point and your the fucking racist sexist homophobic enemy.
That "more liberal than thou" mindset hurts the very people and institutions that liberals are trying to help.
I didn't say he was wrong, I said I can't stand him.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 13901
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: Bill Maher Discusses The Lesser of Two Evils
May 7, 2017 at 5:14 am
(May 6, 2017 at 7:19 pm)Jehanne Wrote: (May 6, 2017 at 3:40 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: I thought she would be 8 more years of Obama-like policies, but she'd have known what the fuck she was doing, she'd not be starting a war in NK, she'd not be damaging international relations nearly non-stop, and she'd not be rolling back the clock on Climate Change, Education, Civil Rights, Separation between Church and State, etc etc etc.
Other than climate change (which may kill all of us, or at least our descendants), my prediction is that Trump will be the best thing for progressivism.
But he's an amoral business man. The worst person to put in charge of a country. There was a meeting the other day when it was announced that the US foreign policy would no longer consider "american values" only the bottom line.
This is going to turn the US into a branch of the mafia.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 7259
Threads: 506
Joined: December 12, 2015
Reputation:
22
RE: Bill Maher Discusses The Lesser of Two Evils
May 7, 2017 at 9:32 am
(This post was last modified: May 7, 2017 at 9:33 am by Jehanne.)
(May 7, 2017 at 12:56 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: (May 6, 2017 at 11:01 pm)Jehanne Wrote: No one's perfect; I heard that he was a speed writer for LBJ, and he sneaked one of the first mentions of climate change into one of LBJ's State of the Union speeches.
Sounds a bit tricky, as Maher would have been about 13 when LBJ left office.
Boru
So much for believing everything that one hears! (As I recall, it was an academic who mentioned this during a presentation.) But, LBJ did at least mention climate change:
http://www.dailyclimate.org/tdc-newsroom...te-warning
P.S. "Speech writer" and not "speed"; I doubt that LBJ did any of that!!
Posts: 9176
Threads: 76
Joined: November 21, 2013
Reputation:
40
RE: Bill Maher Discusses The Lesser of Two Evils
May 7, 2017 at 10:42 am
Well obviously ignoring the real issues, and just saying you're better than the other guy is not the way to win a presidential election. Unfortunately Hillary and the DNC don't seem to have learned that lesson, so there's really no helping them.
Posts: 2087
Threads: 65
Joined: August 30, 2015
Reputation:
24
RE: Bill Maher Discusses The Lesser of Two Evils
May 7, 2017 at 12:05 pm
Maher is right.
Hillary would be doing much better than Donald Trump right now. People wouldn't be in fear of losing their coverage. LGBT wouldn't be in fear of losing their rights. We wouldn't be seeing Christian-Sharia law get a leg to stand on. We wouldn't have lost the respect of the international community. The Education department wouldn't be run by a banshee bitch who wants to brainwash our children with creationist nonsense. The EPA wouldn't be run by a man who'd be totally okay with companies dumping oil in the local water supply if it meant saving money. The new healtchare plan wouldn't be coming from people who think that poor people should just go die already. She wouldn't be taking trips to Mar-A-Lago every week. I bet she doesn't even play golf. We'd be much better off under Clinton. And anyone who thinks otherwise isn't really a liberal.
The whole tone of Church teaching in regard to woman is, to the last degree, contemptuous and degrading. - Elizabeth Cady Stanton
Posts: 2308
Threads: 23
Joined: January 18, 2017
Reputation:
35
RE: Bill Maher Discusses The Lesser of Two Evils
May 7, 2017 at 2:14 pm
DJ Trump sets the bar really low.
Sent from my LGL52VL using Tapatalk
Posts: 9942
Threads: 21
Joined: September 8, 2015
Reputation:
79
RE: Bill Maher Discusses The Lesser of Two Evils
May 7, 2017 at 2:18 pm
(May 7, 2017 at 2:14 pm)Industrial Lad Wrote: DJ Trump sets the bar really low.
Sent from my LGL52VL using Tapatalk
Is there some way to get the bar underground? Even then it wouldn't matter all that much.
If you get to thinking you’re a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else’s dog around.
Posts: 2308
Threads: 23
Joined: January 18, 2017
Reputation:
35
RE: Bill Maher Discusses The Lesser of Two Evils
May 7, 2017 at 2:38 pm
(May 7, 2017 at 2:18 pm)Fireball Wrote: (May 7, 2017 at 2:14 pm)Industrial Lad Wrote: DJ Trump sets the bar really low.
Sent from my LGL52VL using Tapatalk
Is there some way to get the bar underground? Even then it wouldn't matter all that much. That's what he means by "winning."
We're going to win. Worst president ever. Let me tell you. Believe me. Tremendous.
Sent from my LGL52VL using Tapatalk
Posts: 8731
Threads: 425
Joined: October 7, 2014
Reputation:
37
RE: Bill Maher Discusses The Lesser of Two Evils
May 7, 2017 at 5:14 pm
(May 6, 2017 at 3:40 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: I thought she would be 8 more years of Obama-like policies, but she'd have known what the fuck she was doing, she'd not be starting a war in NK, she'd not be damaging international relations nearly non-stop, and she'd not be rolling back the clock on Climate Change, Education, Civil Rights, Separation between Church and State, etc etc etc.
She supported some of the things Trump wanted i agree with you but at the same time she was more for fracking TPP etc.
The country as it is needs to move away from Oil and Gasoline the fact now is the public spoken and is doing it themselves because look at the oil demand
it is a all time low and is continuing to drop even further. Tesla the car manufacture now is ahead of GM on the market and in 2018 will release a cheaper car
for the pubic and it already has the interest in consumers already even me. So the public moving to renewable energy while other countries do so as well even the EU.
I would guess she would have the same stance on climate change.. but i doubt she would have done anything really towards it trying to fix it and well Trump denied climate
change he we didn't exactly pull out the paris climate change agreement. As far as education goes we have a shitty education system that isn't worth a damn
no one should have a child here and expect a top of the line education it was shitty and all they did was make it shittier there is better education in other countries.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>
Posts: 15351
Threads: 118
Joined: January 13, 2014
Reputation:
117
RE: Bill Maher Discusses The Lesser of Two Evils
May 7, 2017 at 6:15 pm
(This post was last modified: May 7, 2017 at 6:17 pm by SteelCurtain.)
(May 7, 2017 at 5:14 pm)dyresand Wrote: (May 6, 2017 at 3:40 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: I thought she would be 8 more years of Obama-like policies, but she'd have known what the fuck she was doing, she'd not be starting a war in NK, she'd not be damaging international relations nearly non-stop, and she'd not be rolling back the clock on Climate Change, Education, Civil Rights, Separation between Church and State, etc etc etc.
She supported some of the things Trump wanted i agree with you but at the same time she was more for fracking TPP etc.
Dude. Dude. Do you even possess an ounce of critical thought? "She supported some of the things Trump wanted". What? When did I say that, and what the fuck are you even talking about?
Pulling out of TPP will be one of the worst mistakes America makes foreign/trade policy wise in a long time. It was a shitty deal, and we needed to not sign it as is, but right now China is negotiating a massive trade deal in the South Pacific without us in the way. Killing TPP was a populist, terrible idea. Amending it before it was signed would have been a smart move. Hillary said she was going to kill TPP, but even if she was lying as you somehow need her to be, signing the deal as it is right now would be far far far far preferable to not being involved in the deal at all. No matter what America does manufacturing-wise, we are going to be buying electrical components/chips from overseas.
(May 7, 2017 at 5:14 pm)dyresand Wrote: I would guess she would have the same stance on climate change.. but i doubt she would have done anything really towards it trying to fix it and well Trump denied climate
change he we didn't exactly pull out the paris climate change agreement.
I don't know why I get into these conversations with you. You are so monumentally misinformed, I just feel like someone has to say at least something to you in the hopes that something, anything, slips through. You literally are the equivalent of the "evolution is just a theory" creationist in that you have heard why you're just fucking objectively wrong a thousand times, but you just stick to your guns. Nothing, nothing about the liberal agenda or Hillary's platform supports this ignorant ass shit you just made up here. The equivocation here is just atrocious. Hillary would not have appointed a climate change denier to head the EPA. She would not have okayed the Keystone Pipeline, she would not have allowed coal plants to dump refuse into water supplies. She would not have rolled back the requirement that in order to sell cars in the US in 2025, you had to meet a 54.5 mpg fleet average. Hillary repeatedly said on the campaign trail that Climate change was the most important issue affecting our future. You are just pitifully ignorant.
(May 7, 2017 at 5:14 pm)dyresand Wrote: As far as education goes we have a shitty education system that isn't worth a damn
no one should have a child here and expect a top of the line education it was shitty and all they did was make it shittier there is better education in other countries.
So your attitude is, "it's broken, so fuck it?" Allow federal dollars to go to religious schools because "choice." Take money away from schools that are struggling and need it and give it to schools that are already doing well? You think Hillary would appoint a billionaire über evangelical who has never set foot in a private school to head the DOE?
I think you just need to justify why you and people like you handed this country over to our dear leader and the Republicans because you know you fucked up. Your head is just too far up your own ass to admit that you make shit up to make it okay.
Don't bring that bullshit in here.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
|