Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: 23rd November 2017, 03:20

Poll: What do y'all think of my analogy?
This poll is closed.
Great analogy!
2 40.00%
Fucking shit analogy!
1 20.00%
2 40.00%
Total 5 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Case Against Compatabilism
RE: The Case Against Compatabilism
What do you mean by share process?

Do you mean I think out loud?

Yeah totally. And I'm exactly like this in RL too. Ask pocaracas for confirmation Big Grin
We do not change our minds. Our minds change us.
RE: The Case Against Compatabilism
(18th May 2017, 22:20)Succubus Wrote: Two metaphysical libertarians, a hard incompatabilist and a bowl of petunias walk into a bar, and the barman says; err... I'll get back later.

Sorry but this: "err... I'll get back later.". Was 'me'. I couldn't remember the rest of the joke. Sorry if I caused confusion Tongue
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.
RE: The Case Against Compatabilism
(19th May 2017, 11:41)Hammy Wrote:
(19th May 2017, 11:35)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: Personally, I think the distinction between compatibalism and determinism is largely a distinction without a difference. In neither case, can anyone alter the trajectory of efficient causes and both presuppose physical causal closure.

Compatabilism and determinism are certainly not the same thing....

So there are three separate questions. There is the question "Is free will possible?" there's the question "If free will is possible is it possible in a deterministic universe?" and there's the question "Do you believe in a deterministic universe?".

Yes you've staked out the various positions nicely as far as what people believe. What people believe doesn't mean their positions are coherent. The problem is that they don't agree on the definition of free will. There's no difference between being compelled to choose a certain way and being compelled to act a certain way.
RE: The Case Against Compatabilism
Of course there is. If the 'choice' you 'make' is ultimately forced by someone or something else... then that's different to you not being ultimately forced by someone or something else.
We do not change our minds. Our minds change us.

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The argument against "evil", theists please come to the defense. MysticKnight 151 40949 15th November 2017, 19:00
Last Post: bennyboy
  What philosophical evidence is there against believing in non-physical entities? joseph_ 150 5374 3rd September 2016, 11:26
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  2 Birds, 1 Stone: An argument against free will and Aquinas' First Way Mudhammam 1 602 20th February 2016, 08:02
Last Post: ignoramus
  An argument against God MysticKnight 37 5224 20th October 2014, 15:31
Last Post: TreeSapNest
  Using the arguments against actual infinites against theists Freedom of thought 4 1150 14th May 2014, 00:58
Last Post: Freedom of thought
  My case for an Idealistic Monism bennyboy 17 1440 1st April 2014, 21:01
Last Post: Whateverist
  "Knockdown" Argument Against Naturalism Mudhammam 16 3264 2nd January 2014, 22:42
Last Post: Jörmungandr
  Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism: A Refutation MindForgedManacle 0 853 21st November 2013, 10:22
Last Post: MindForgedManacle
  Argument Against Religious Experience as Validation MindForgedManacle 31 5394 4th November 2013, 18:51
Last Post: Lion IRC
  Argument Against Divine Purpose MindForgedManacle 15 2706 23rd October 2013, 01:32
Last Post: max-greece

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)