|
Ethics of sex robots
|
 (October 28, 2017 at 3:37 pm)energizer bunny Wrote: I think its stupid and will just further encourage the desperation and demand for sex. Sex will become more mechanical while less passionate and intimate. Hence men will even more likely treat women as such. Are we seriously becoming that desperate that we are willing to have sex with robots for a quick relief? Some folks is just butt ugly and will take whatever they can get.  (October 28, 2017 at 3:37 pm)energizer bunny Wrote: I think its stupid and will just further encourage the desperation and demand for sex. Sex will become more mechanical while less passionate and intimate. Hence men will even more likely treat women as such. Are we seriously becoming that desperate that we are willing to have sex with robots for a quick relief? I can see 2 types of people using these things: desperate/lonely people, and pervs.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh  RE: Ethics of sex robots
October 28, 2017 at 6:18 pm
(This post was last modified: October 28, 2017 at 6:19 pm by DLJ.
Edit Reason: typo
)
(October 28, 2017 at 10:26 am)c172 Wrote: http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/comm...story.html Interesting article but I see one major design flaw... Why on Earth would you want to buy one that talks?  (October 28, 2017 at 12:31 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: What are the ethics of being unable to identify and incarcerate all active and incipient pedophiles vs encouraging them to use simulacra in lieu of the real thing ?? The ethics of the former is the ethics of 1984... thought-crimes? No thank you. The ethics of the latter is the same as the ethics of any person encouraging someone else to act upon their desires (gluttony, lust, hate, disgust)... it depends upon the harm and / or legality of the act. 
The PURPOSE of life is to replicate our DNA ................. (from Darwin)
The MEANING of life is the experience of living ... (from Frank Herbert) The VALUE of life is the legacy we leave behind ..... (from observation) 
Even at the most extreme peak of technology where the robots are like terminators but for sex, someone like me wouldn't be interested. I like the challenge and puzzle of figuring out how to have sex with humans. I like the element of not knowing if success is imminent or not. I like giving real pleasure to someone.
But I'm sure the robots would be popular, just like I don't go see prostitutes but they are popular. I would say if a man or woman thinks they are getting everything they need from a machine, that probably makes them some sort of psychopath, or at least someone who has no interest in human love. To me that means it's not so bad they're taken out of the gene pool. They don't have kids because they're fucking these robots. I think natural selection takes care of the ethics of it for you. Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them. Impersonation is treason.  (October 28, 2017 at 2:09 pm)Whateverist Wrote:(October 28, 2017 at 2:04 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: Fearing the men will prefer sex robots to women or will begin treating women as sex robots sounds a little irrational. Only if I reward them properly. (sigh)
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
 RE: Ethics of sex robots
October 28, 2017 at 7:56 pm
(This post was last modified: October 28, 2017 at 8:01 pm by LadyForCamus.)
(October 28, 2017 at 10:26 am)c172 Wrote: http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/comm...story.html That shit is crazy as hell! I've seen too many scary movies to ever want something like that in my house, lol. You'd think they would have the technology to make her sound a little less like Siri, and a little more like a woman, though. (October 28, 2017 at 3:35 pm)chimp3 Wrote: I would not stick my pecker into one of those... However! If they could program one of those to adequately simulate sex (with enough variations to keep it interesting) then they could make a chorebot. They already have those vacuuming bots but I am talking sweeping, dusting, cleaning bathrooms, feed and walk dog, do dishes, etc. I am not being sexist. I would not demand this chorebot look like Audrey Hepburn in a French maid outfit. Hell, I don't care if it looks like a pogo stick. If it gets the job done , I am on board! What if it only came in the variety of an erect Channing Tatum? 😋
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.  (October 28, 2017 at 7:56 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: That shit is crazy as hell! I've seen too many scary movies to ever want something like that in my house, lol. You'd think they would have the technology to make her sound a little less like Siri, and a little more like a woman, though. Exactly. A little realism is needed. Less this: [Man]: Now bend over and take it up the ass. [Siri-like Robot]: Head 'em off at the pass. Said by cowboys in old Westerns. To this: [Man]: Now bend over and take it up the ass. [Woman-like Robot]: In your fucking dreams, creep. RE: Ethics of sex robots
October 28, 2017 at 8:08 pm
(This post was last modified: October 28, 2017 at 8:08 pm by LadyForCamus.)
(October 28, 2017 at 8:03 pm)Crossless2.0 Wrote:(October 28, 2017 at 7:56 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: That shit is crazy as hell! I've seen too many scary movies to ever want something like that in my house, lol. You'd think they would have the technology to make her sound a little less like Siri, and a little more like a woman, though. Lol. Maybe they could even create a "Not tonight; I'm constipated," response, and set it to 'shuffle'. 😁
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken. (October 28, 2017 at 8:08 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:(October 28, 2017 at 8:03 pm)Crossless2.0 Wrote: Exactly. A little realism is needed. *Wonders if his wife's alleged vegetable/fruit/grain allergy is true and why, after all, she needs to consume two pounds of cheese daily.*  (October 28, 2017 at 6:04 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(October 28, 2017 at 3:37 pm)energizer bunny Wrote: I think its stupid and will just further encourage the desperation and demand for sex. Sex will become more mechanical while less passionate and intimate. Hence men will even more likely treat women as such. Are we seriously becoming that desperate that we are willing to have sex with robots for a quick relief? Pervs? Nothing pervy fun about a glorified dildo. Blech .. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
