"Republicunt": why use terms like this?

[Neo-Scholastic]

Should Neo start posting about snowflakes again?

Ready and willing. :-)

[shadow]

The point is that the truth is more important than being effective or inoffensive.

Why?

[RoadRunner79]

[Joods]

I agree. I have no problem with the use of the insults cunt, faggot, gay, retard, slow, blind, stupid, deaf, and so on,

bolding mine.

Of course you don't have a problem with it. You admit those words are insulting so that only confirms that you lack empathy, compassion and the common sense to understand that out of over hundreds of thousands of words in the English language, you choose those as descriptors. How thoughtful and considerate of you. You are also lumping words that are acceptable in with words that aren't. 

and to the people that are hurt by reading these words, maybe the internet is just not the place for you,

Oh sweetheart, the internet has nothing to do with the use of those words. Someone could use those words in a verbal, face to face conversation and they would still be ignorant of the fact that those words do indeed cause harm. And they would still use them in the same derogatory manner as if they were used, let's say, here, in a forum. 

 but when someone is using those terms multiple times a day, they come off like an 8 year old who just learned those swear words and thinks they're being oh so cool by cursing so much.

So you don't have a problem with someone using those words in general and their target audience should just get the hell over it, but if they use them more than once per day, then you have a problem with it?

[shadow]

So you don't have a problem with someone using those words in general and their target audience should just get the hell over it, but if they use them more than once per day, then you have a problem with it?

One thing I'll point out is the more someone uses insults, the less potent they become. If someone who is usually fair and respectful were to call me out, I'd seriously reconsider my actions or viewpoints. If someone who is always swearing and insulting large groups of people does, it means very little and I'll filter out their criticism. I think this is sort of the point being made here, not so much how many times per day it is okay to insult people.

[Joods]

So you don't have a problem with someone using those words in general and their target audience should just get the hell over it, but if they use them more than once per day, then you have a problem with it?

One thing I'll point out is the more someone uses insults, the less potent they become. If someone who is usually fair and respectful were to call me out, I'd seriously reconsider my actions or viewpoints. If someone who is always swearing and insulting large groups of people does, it means very little and I'll filter out their criticism. I think this is sort of the point being made here, not so much how many times per day it is okay to insult people.

I think FFaith was pretty clear with her annoyance for people who use insults multiple times per day, while at the same time, not having any issues with someone using those insults at all. Twisted word salad thinking like that is what keeps stereotypes and ignorance going in the first place.

[FFaith]

I agree. I have no problem with the use of the insults cunt, faggot, gay, retard, slow, blind, stupid, deaf, and so on,

bolding mine.

Of course you don't have a problem with it. You admit those words are insulting so that only confirms that you lack empathy, compassion and the common sense to understand that out of over hundreds of thousands of words in the English language, you choose those as descriptors. How thoughtful and considerate of you. You are also lumping words that are acceptable in with words that aren't. 

and to the people that are hurt by reading these words, maybe the internet is just not the place for you,

Oh sweetheart, the internet has nothing to do with the use of those words. Someone could use those words in a verbal, face to face conversation and they would still be ignorant of the fact that those words do indeed cause harm. And they would still use them in the same derogatory manner as if they were used, let's say, here, in a forum. 

 but when someone is using those terms multiple times a day, they come off like an 8 year old who just learned those swear words and thinks they're being oh so cool by cursing so much.

So you don't have a problem with someone using those words in general and their target audience should just get the hell over it, but if they use them more than once per day, then you have a problem with it?

I don't have a moral issue with someone calling people cunts all day long, but like was said before, I do consider it childish, in the sense that it reminds me of when kids first learn about swear words and spam them way too much. It's just overkill to hear Republicans being called cunts every single day pretty much, multiple times a day sometimes. Is it childish for me to ever use the insults gay, fag, cunt, or retard? Maybe it is, but if someone calls a white supremacist a retard, then that's who they're insulting and not anyone else. They're insulting the person they're insulting. Not mentally disabled people. If anyone else takes offense when none is intended, that's on them as far as I'm concerned. I think I made the right decision to not completely give up insults like gay and retard, because time has shown that once you start going down that path, the ones complaining about words are never satisfied. Now look at the mess we find ourselves in. Every other word is a microagression these days and it's only going to get worse. I respect you and what you do, and you're entitled to feel however you feel when you see or hear those words, but when it comes down to it, I can't control how other people feel. I don't think I lack empathy. I mostly just use those words with friends anyways, and I just don't think the answer is self censorship, because like I said, once you go down that path... and I'm not talking slippery slope either, because we're already there. We're living in the Onion.

Why are some of those words acceptable but others not? Are you saying that retard is not ok but calling your friend blind for not seeing you walking up to them or something is ok? Why is it ok to use blind as an insult(if that's what you're saying)? Isn't that making fun of actual blind people and their struggles, going by your logic? No? Well, now you know how other people feel about the word retard. That's why I lumped those words together with each other. To show the hypocrisy. The blind, the deaf, and the mentally challenged are not being put down when those insults are used on people that are not blind, deaf, or mentally challenged.

---

One thing I'll point out is the more someone uses insults, the less potent they become. If someone who is usually fair and respectful were to call me out, I'd seriously reconsider my actions or viewpoints. If someone who is always swearing and insulting large groups of people does, it means very little and I'll filter out their criticism. I think this is sort of the point being made here, not so much how many times per day it is okay to insult people.

I think FFaith was pretty clear with her annoyance for people who use insults multiple times per day, while at the same time, not having any issues with someone using those insults at all. Twisted word salad thinking like that is what keeps stereotypes and ignorance going in the first place.

Not a chick.

[shadow]

[FFaith]

[CapnAwesome]

I've always thought there is a purpose to the overuse of insults towards conservatives here, to make atheist forums an unfriendly place towards them as possible.