Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
155
RE: Arguments for God's Existence from Contingency
November 13, 2017 at 5:45 pm
If you were arguing along the lines of "God is not not all-knowing", you would have a point that its negation would carry the meaning that "God is all-knowing". But what you're trying to smuggle in is more along the lines of "God is not not all-unknowing", which is not the same thing at all.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 8214
Threads: 394
Joined: November 2, 2011
Reputation:
44
RE: Arguments for God's Existence from Contingency
November 13, 2017 at 5:52 pm
(This post was last modified: November 13, 2017 at 5:55 pm by Mystic.)
(November 13, 2017 at 5:45 pm)Cyberman Wrote: If you were arguing along the lines of "God is not not all-knowing", you would have a point that its negation would carry the meaning that "God is all-knowing". But what you're trying to smuggle in is more along the lines of "God is not not all-unknowing", which is not the same thing at all.
Triple negation, would lead back to negation. Even negations make it go away, and odd negations make it negation again.
So your phrase would mean God not All-Knowing.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
155
RE: Arguments for God's Existence from Contingency
November 13, 2017 at 5:58 pm
Just as "highly unlikely to be not true" Wouldn't necessarily mean "highly likely to be true".
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 8214
Threads: 394
Joined: November 2, 2011
Reputation:
44
RE: Arguments for God's Existence from Contingency
November 13, 2017 at 6:16 pm
It would mean exactly that. Brush up on logical rules. Double negation. You can always move negations outside, so it would mean not not highly likely to be true. Which would mean highly likely to be true.
Posts: 8715
Threads: 128
Joined: March 1, 2012
Reputation:
53
RE: Arguments for God's Existence from Contingency
November 13, 2017 at 6:36 pm
Damn. My Aquinas monopoly is being challenged.
<insert profound quote here>
Posts: 3045
Threads: 14
Joined: July 7, 2014
Reputation:
14
RE: Arguments for God's Existence from Contingency
November 13, 2017 at 9:01 pm
I prefer discussing the modern version of the Argument from Contingency:
1. Everything that exists has an explanation of its existence (either in the necessity of its own nature or in an external cause).
2. If the universe has an explanation of its existence, that explanation is God.
3. The universe exists.
4. The universe has an explanation of its existence. (from 1 and 3)
5. Therefore, the explanation of the universe’s existence is God. (from 2 and 4)
It is easier for someone to understand right away. Aquinas' takes getting used to the language and the various threads of logic.
So, which of these premises are wrong?
Posts: 67478
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
161
RE: Arguments for God's Existence from Contingency
November 13, 2017 at 10:30 pm
(This post was last modified: November 13, 2017 at 10:34 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
Premise 2. Unsound, and assumes the conclusion. How could that not jump out at you?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 28582
Threads: 526
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
89
RE: Arguments for God's Existence from Contingency
November 13, 2017 at 10:31 pm
(November 13, 2017 at 9:01 pm)SteveII Wrote: I prefer discussing the modern version of the Argument from Contingency:
1. Everything that exists has an explanation of its existence (either in the necessity of its own nature or in an external cause).
2. If the universe has an explanation of its existence, that explanation is God.
3. The universe exists.
4. The universe has an explanation of its existence. (from 1 and 3)
5. Therefore, the explanation of the universe’s existence is God. (from 2 and 4)
It is easier for someone to understand right away. Aquinas' takes getting used to the language and the various threads of logic.
So, which of these premises are wrong?
1, 2, and 5.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: Arguments for God's Existence from Contingency
November 13, 2017 at 10:44 pm
(This post was last modified: November 13, 2017 at 10:45 pm by Amarok.)
Or the universe need not be any of the above . And the universe requires no explanation.
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Posts: 28582
Threads: 526
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
89
RE: Arguments for God's Existence from Contingency
November 13, 2017 at 10:48 pm
(November 13, 2017 at 10:44 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: Or the universe need not be any of the above . And the universe requires no explanation.
Yet we keep explaining parts of it, that I like. I don't always understand completely, but I like.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
|
