Why does science always upstage God?

[Astreja]

Wow, you guys really broke this one.

I think he came pre-broken.  He was rattling even before we opened the box.

[arewethereyet]

Wow, you guys really broke this one.

I think he came pre-broken.  He was rattling even before we opened the box.

[Billy Bob]

Maybe if you drank a big pot of coffee it may register with you that you and your side can't be convinced because you're spoiled brats who ignore science and hate being proved wrong. You'll all do whatever takes to believe your absurdities.

That didn't make it any more convincing.  Nothing else?

You are more than welcome to show ANY of you evidence that got around the science I gave. You can't though.

[Billy Bob]

It is best to admit you have a reading and thinking problem, this way you can seek help. Your brain really is messed up. Show the correct doctor your replies and they will CLEARLY see what your issue is. Show them what you IGNORED>>>

----So this is considered your evidence to show the laws were not there when we know naturally has ALWAYS had the laws existing. Drum roll for this BIG scientific evidence.....

"It's basic science fact, not science fiction."

Wow, you may have convinced a rock but to any sane person, that was really funny. 

Now, be quiet and the next time provide evidence that is observable, repeatable, and falsifiable. That's right, you don't have the integrity to care about what science shows, you just like to make up whatever you want. 

"Moreover, you're the one claiming the laws as we know them hold at the time in question."

Well, if you knew how to read and were honest at the same time, I clearly showed creation was done supernaturally. That means the laws were not in place, duh. That means that the laws could not have been in place then. Did it EVER register with you that supernaturally is not natural, it's beyond natural? If so, why are you so 'slow'? And the thing is, I already covered this. But don't feel embarrassed, your fellow atheistic types are as slow as you are. 

"Science doesn't say that.  That's just something you pulled out of your butt."

Actually, you can pull up those laws, all that I gave before, and you'll see they are really laws. You'd see too that I clearly said creation was supernatural. You'd see it YOU that has YOUR head up YOUR butt.

"Actual science says that what happens then is not currently understood."

Well, you even contradicted yourself. Yep, that is how SLOW you are. Just previously you wrote....

"It's basic science fact, not science fiction."

If it were a science fact, you'd have evidence. Now for a BIG laugh, this is your evidence....

"Actual science says that what happens then is not currently understood."

Come on, just look how stoooo-pid you are. Does your left part of your brain know what your right side is thinking? You need to tell both sides that they need to agree before showing you have no idea what you write.

"So you're claiming that you know something that science doesn't, which makes you the one with the evidence problem."

Maybe read this a 1000 times and see if it registers with either side of your brain that also can't agree what you think....

Science is observable, repeatable, and falsifiable. YOU believe this all came about naturally. The laws I gave show they can't because naturally the 1st and 2nd laws won't allow it. 

AGAIN...be quiet and the next time provide evidence that is observable, repeatable, and falsifiable. YOU chose YOUR position so back it up. I backed up my position and look what a pathetic example you are not being able to get around it and actually contradict yourself! It may be best to be quiet rather than show how little you think and how you really don't care about honesty and science. 

Laughing is not helping you. It's showing the fear you have replying to me.

It is best to admit you have a reading and thinking problem, this way you can seek help. Your brain really is messed up. Show the correct doctor your replies and they will CLEARLY see what your issue is. Show them what you IGNORED>>>

----So this is considered your evidence to show the laws were not there when we know naturally has ALWAYS had the laws existing. Drum roll for this BIG scientific evidence.....

"It's basic science fact, not science fiction."

Wow, you may have convinced a rock but to any sane person, that was really funny. 

Now, be quiet and the next time provide evidence that is observable, repeatable, and falsifiable. That's right, you don't have the integrity to care about what science shows, you just like to make up whatever you want. 

"Moreover, you're the one claiming the laws as we know them hold at the time in question."

Well, if you knew how to read and were honest at the same time, I clearly showed creation was done supernaturally. That means the laws were not in place, duh. That means that the laws could not have been in place then. Did it EVER register with you that supernaturally is not natural, it's beyond natural? If so, why are you so 'slow'? And the thing is, I already covered this. But don't feel embarrassed, your fellow atheistic types are as slow as you are. 

"Science doesn't say that.  That's just something you pulled out of your butt."

Actually, you can pull up those laws, all that I gave before, and you'll see they are really laws. You'd see too that I clearly said creation was supernatural. You'd see it YOU that has YOUR head up YOUR butt.

"Actual science says that what happens then is not currently understood."

Well, you even contradicted yourself. Yep, that is how SLOW you are. Just previously you wrote....

"It's basic science fact, not science fiction."

If it were a science fact, you'd have evidence. Now for a BIG laugh, this is your evidence....

"Actual science says that what happens then is not currently understood."

Come on, just look how stoooo-pid you are. Does your left part of your brain know what your right side is thinking? You need to tell both sides that they need to agree before showing you have no idea what you write.

"So you're claiming that you know something that science doesn't, which makes you the one with the evidence problem."

Maybe read this a 1000 times and see if it registers with either side of your brain that also can't agree what you think....

Science is observable, repeatable, and falsifiable. YOU believe this all came about naturally. The laws I gave show they can't because naturally the 1st and 2nd laws won't allow it. 

AGAIN...be quiet and the next time provide evidence that is observable, repeatable, and falsifiable. YOU chose YOUR position so back it up. I backed up my position and look what a pathetic example you are not being able to get around it and actually contradict yourself! It may be best to be quiet rather than show how little you think and how you really don't care about honesty and science. 

[arewethereyet]

Administrator Notice
I guess you have a comprehension problem. You cannot attempt to limit participation by another member. You have done it at least twice. If you are ignoring Forum Bot, and it appears you are, that's also agaisnt the rules.

[Billy Bob]

It is best to admit you have a reading and thinking problem, this way you can seek help. Your brain really is messed up. Show the correct doctor your replies and they will CLEARLY see what your issue is. Show them what you IGNORED>>>

----So this is considered your evidence to show the laws were not there when we know naturally has ALWAYS had the laws existing. Drum roll for this BIG scientific evidence.....

"It's basic science fact, not science fiction."

Wow, you may have convinced a rock but to any sane person, that was really funny. 

Now, be quiet and the next time provide evidence that is observable, repeatable, and falsifiable. That's right, you don't have the integrity to care about what science shows, you just like to make up whatever you want. 

"Moreover, you're the one claiming the laws as we know them hold at the time in question."

Well, if you knew how to read and were honest at the same time, I clearly showed creation was done supernaturally. That means the laws were not in place, duh. That means that the laws could not have been in place then. Did it EVER register with you that supernaturally is not natural, it's beyond natural? If so, why are you so 'slow'? And the thing is, I already covered this. But don't feel embarrassed, your fellow atheistic types are as slow as you are. 

"Science doesn't say that.  That's just something you pulled out of your butt."

Actually, you can pull up those laws, all that I gave before, and you'll see they are really laws. You'd see too that I clearly said creation was supernatural. You'd see it YOU that has YOUR head up YOUR butt.

"Actual science says that what happens then is not currently understood."

Well, you even contradicted yourself. Yep, that is how SLOW you are. Just previously you wrote....

"It's basic science fact, not science fiction."

If it were a science fact, you'd have evidence. Now for a BIG laugh, this is your evidence....

"Actual science says that what happens then is not currently understood."

Come on, just look how stoooo-pid you are. Does your left part of your brain know what your right side is thinking? You need to tell both sides that they need to agree before showing you have no idea what you write.

"So you're claiming that you know something that science doesn't, which makes you the one with the evidence problem."

Maybe read this a 1000 times and see if it registers with either side of your brain that also can't agree what you think....

Science is observable, repeatable, and falsifiable. YOU believe this all came about naturally. The laws I gave show they can't because naturally the 1st and 2nd laws won't allow it. 

AGAIN...be quiet and the next time provide evidence that is observable, repeatable, and falsifiable. YOU chose YOUR position so back it up. I backed up my position and look what a pathetic example you are not being able to get around it and actually contradict yourself! It may be best to be quiet rather than show how little you think and how you really don't care about honesty and science. 

Enough freebies for you...read our rules.  Especially the one on flaming and if you don't know what that is you can Google it.

The other one is that you cannot attempt to limit participation in a thread.

This is friendly advice.  Do it again and it won't be so friendly.

"Enough freebies for you...read our rules.  Especially the one on flaming and if you don't know what that is you can Google it.
The other one is that you cannot attempt to limit participation in a thread.
This is friendly advice.  Do it again and it won't be so friendly."

You poor people, you put out a thread titled, "Why does science always upstage God?" but when I show you fools have NO science that upstages God, oh, then let's think of a way to get rid of me. You don't like seeing the fools that you are. I've been very fair showing the science and you jokes ignore it and lie about it. Go ahead, try to get rid of me. It's the ONLY way you all can try to pretend to be smart with me gone. No one is challenging you. You don't like challenges. You're happy being braindead and lying as if you have science that upstages God. All you're doing is providing God with laughs. Oh, but in The End, the joke will be on YOU.

[Angrboda]

[The Valkyrie]

Enough freebies for you...read our rules.  Especially the one on flaming and if you don't know what that is you can Google it.

The other one is that you cannot attempt to limit participation in a thread.

This is friendly advice.  Do it again and it won't be so friendly.

"Enough freebies for you...read our rules.  Especially the one on flaming and if you don't know what that is you can Google it.
The other one is that you cannot attempt to limit participation in a thread.
This is friendly advice.  Do it again and it won't be so friendly."

You poor people, you put out a thread titled, "Why does science always upstage God?" but when I show you fools have NO science that upstages God, oh, then let's think of a way to get rid of me. You don't like seeing the fools that you are. I've been very fair showing the science and you jokes ignore it and lie about it. Go ahead, try to get rid of me. It's the ONLY way you all can try to pretend to be smart with me gone. No one is challenging you. You don't like challenges. You're happy being braindead and lying as if you have science that upstages God. All you're doing is providing God with laughs. Oh, but in The End, the joke will be on YOU.

Don't play the victim.

We have rules. You've violated them.

You've been advised, with no repercussions, when you've broken the rules.

You continued to ignore them.

You've been reprimanded by staff but continue to ignore the rules.

You have no-one to blame but yourself. Then, you'll play the martyr.

Seen it numerous times.

[Angrboda]

You guys just don't realize. He's speshul.

[Fake Messiah]

Why does math ignore God?