Aziz Ansari Doesn't Pick Up On "Non-Verbal Cues" and Gets Treated Like A Rapist

[Thumpalumpacus]

People are espousing opinions, and denigrating them on assumed motivations when you may or may not know why they're doing so is presumptuous at best and dishonest at worst.

Pot, meet kettle.

Pay no attention to the username behind the post.

Yeah, it's not like she has ever pushed her church's agenda around here.

It's odd that you should need what is so obvious pointed out to you. But hey, I'm here to help.

[polymath257]

Imagine this. Two people start making out. Clothes come off. They continue to make out, completely naked. Is it reasonable at that point for one of them to assume that its ok to reach for the others' genetelia?

If you're making out with someone and you both got naked and are making out naked, do you have to ask "may I touch your vagina?" If you do so without asking, is that sexual assault?

As I said before. Getting naked during a make out session certainly sends out a major non verbal cue.

Asking "may I please touch your vagina" would kill the entire mood.

And what if she's the submissive type and likes to be told what to do DURING sex?

If she had to permit everything that would turn her off because she's submissive and doesn't want to have to tell the guy what to do.

The point is that once sex starts.... sex has started. To stop it... you say "stop".

Then maybe they have to agree on a safe word ahead of time, eh? Or communicate about rules of conduct. True dom/sub relationships tend to communicate enough that this isn't an issue. But if that is going on in the *first date* without previous conversation, the alarm bells should be ringing off the hook.

[Shell B]

Yeah, you can't just assume a dom/sub relationship. Those are usually well-formed ahead of any sexual encounter that involves that dynamic.

[Tiberius]

Yeah, it's not like she has ever pushed her church's agenda around here.

It's odd that you should need what is so obvious pointed out to you. But hey, I'm here to help.

It's odd that you think you can denigrate someone over an assumed position but then say that behavior is "presumptuous at best and dishonest at worst".

So are you presumptuous or dishonest?

[ErGingerbreadMandude]

The kind of men that need to be told "ffs stop it you creepo, I withdraw consent! I no longer give consent! Let me go!" shouldn't be having sex in the first place if you ask me, not that they ever could but the stars might align and they might get lucky, just like Ansari did, if it weren't for his celebrity status and his rich family he'd be lurking in some incel forums and sending hate messages to girls for not touching his pp.  

The ironic thing is... based on your post history and the sort of anti-feminist and sexist threads you've made and how creepy and rapey you've seemed in the past... the fact you are arguing the opposite perspective now merely to fit it just goes to show that the real "White Knight"s that I'm talking about really do exist.

And funny that you whine about incels when you're a perfect example of one. I guess ever since you decided to pretend to be Christian and renounce your 'sinful' ways of atheism, you also decided to pretend to be nice by stating things that some of the feminists you hate will actually agree with for once

My opinion is that... at least over here at AF... YOU don't have your own opinion anymore. You tried being yourself on AF ages ago, and everyone thought you were a douchebag... and you've decided to fake niceness and pretend to be a changed man and pretend that God exists ever since then.

Anyways, I'm getting off track here. Basically, your opinions on this thread seem just as disingenuous to me as your shit about turning Christian.

Don't talk to me you creep. Fucking asshole. Like I care about getting a personality certificate from you. You're the one getting riled up at me over a post I made bashing rapists. Fucking weirdo. Gross.

[Amarok]

Asking "may I please touch your vagina" would kill the entire mood. 

Yes because you staying in the mood is most important issue here .

[Edwardo Piet]

Asking "may I please touch your vagina" would kill the entire mood.

And what if she's the submissive type and likes to be told what to do DURING sex?

If she had to permit everything that would turn her off because she's submissive and doesn't want to have to tell the guy what to do.

The point is that once sex starts.... sex has started. To stop it... you say "stop".

Then maybe they have to agree on a safe word ahead of time, eh? Or communicate about rules of conduct. True dom/sub relationships tend to communicate enough that this isn't an issue. But if that is going on in the *first date* without previous conversation, the alarm bells should be ringing off the hook.

A safe word is used to mean "stop". Not to mean "keep going". You're proving my point.

If the safety word in a d/s relationship is "banana"... it would be really odd (and impossible) for the woman to constantly say "banana" during sex including the times between breathes that she is unable to speak and yet isn't feeling that it's banana time no more before changing her mind again a split second later.

[Amarok]

Yes because asking someone if they want fuck while making out naked is such a task

[Thumpalumpacus]

Yeah I totally get that. I fucking hate the word "snowflake", as well. And I totally get it that the term "White Knight" is used by the same sort of right-winged douche bags that I loathe.

Another one is "cuck" or "beta male" or "autistic screeching". I hate all those terms as well.

But I don't know how else to describe what I'm talking about. And as much as I dislike a word, just because the connotation is negative it doesn't make the dennotation meaningless. Some people really are White Knights in how they behave, and some people really are snowflakes in the sense of being hypersensitive. I wouldn't use that word though. I'd rather not use "White Knight" either but I can't think of a more succinct word to describe what I'm talking about.

Well, when you use a term you have to accept the connotations that other people will attach. If you're happy dragging that luggage around, great. Me, I find the term to be one designed to belittle someone who disagrees, rather than answer them. And that immediately makes me wonder if the person using the term actually has an answer at all.

[ErGingerbreadMandude]

Yes because asking someone if they want fuck while making out naked is such a task

If the creeps have to ask that then how will they get to rape women?