Just saw this garbage on my local news.

[shadow]

Well, in general, commas can be used a great deal or hardly at all.  Their usage is entirely at the discretion of the writer.

Clearly you are not a physicist, or you would know the importance of perfect grammar and revere its technicalities. Don't insult the field by reducing the science of grammatical minutia to some liberal art. It is not so! Get off the science subforum if you want to propagate these anti-science ideas.

[Amarok]

1. I have no criminal record . I would not have my current occupation if i did.

2. Banned fancies himself a psychologist . Or a mind reader . 

3. He also sucks as a criminologist as some criminals do in fact lash out for no reason . Other then lashing out .

4. He confuses the harsh words he's earned . With some profound fault of mine .

[Foxaèr]

Clearly you are not a physicist, or you would know the importance of perfect grammar and revere its technicalities. Don't insult the field by reducing the science of grammatical minutia to some liberal art. It is not so! Get off the science subforum if you want to propagate these anti-science ideas.

Correct. Clearly, I am a writer.

[Banned]

The point I was making wasn't about English grammar, but how would you be able to correctly assess comments on a physical phenomenon, if you can't handle the conveying language?

Your second comma is grammatically incorrect; you don't need a comma between an independent and dependent clause when the independent one comes first.

I don't see how you can act like some authority on either grammar or physics when you don't even know how to use a comma correctly.

That's right. My writing style is older English, the modern style doesn't use comma's as often.

---

Says the moron who knows dick about Physics . But just loves to play expert .

---

So take your English lecture and cram it up your ass.

I did not say anyone had a criminal record, I said that their words express criminal thoughts - using vile language against someone that hasn't offended them or anyone else. That is what the criminal mind does. And there are jails and sentences which have no visible bars. You don't need to be in a physical jail to be trapped. Which is proven by the fact that if they are confronted with their defect, they cannot change their habits, because they will not.

[shadow]

Your second comma is grammatically incorrect; you don't need a comma between an independent and dependent clause when the independent one comes first.

I don't see how you can act like some authority on either grammar or physics when you don't even know how to use a comma correctly.

That's right. My writing style is older English, the modern style doesn't use comma's as often.

Older English? What do you know about English? You just used an apostrophe when pluralizing the word "comma". 

[Banned]

That's right. My writing style is older English, the modern style doesn't use comma's as often.

Older English? What do you know about English? You just used an apostrophe when pluralizing the word "comma". 

My mistake, and thanks for pointing that out.
At least I didn't call you by a short name, and that's the point I was making.
I posted something unoffensive and I get jail material for it.

[Amarok]

I have no tolerance or respect for weasel apologists who cloak their lies their disingenuousness or their agenda in the guise of being the "nice guy And cry victim when their crap is exposed and justly railed upon . Cussing out a disingenuous apologist is not a sign one is in jail or any such pseudo psychological nonsense . It's a sign one is offended by apologists flim flam and will not give it any courtesy. And will confront it in the bluntist and most unapologetic manner possible .

So you can take your disingenuous nonsense about jail talk. And put were the english lecture and you attempts at playing psychologist went .

[Banned]

I have no tolerance or respect for weasel apologists who cloak their lies their disingenuousness or their agenda in the guise of being the "nice guy And cry victim when their crap is exposed and justly railed upon . Cussing out a disingenuous apologist is not a sign one is in jail or any such pseudo psychological nonsense . It's a sign one is offended by apologists flim flam and will not give it any courtesy. And will confront it in the bluntist and most unapologetic manner possible .

So you can take your disingenuous nonsense about jail talk. And put were the english lecture and you attempts at playing psychologist went .

It's not too complicated, in your very first comment you thought that name calling was the best way to enter a conversation...I guess not all people will go along with it.
No one's crying victim here, you don't have the great impact that you imagine, which is probaby part of your low self worth in the first place.

[Cyberman]

Administrator Notice
If playground name-calling and personal attacks are all that are left, I'm going to lock the thread. Last chance.

[Amarok]

I'm personally for locking it. I can't see any more value in this thread