Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 25, 2024, 5:36 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rolling Stones or Beatles
#1
Rolling Stones or Beatles
Really don't know where to put this one...
Would you consider yourself more of a Rolling Stones fan, or a Beatles fan?
The Beatles were politically outspoken, as well as being outspoken on social matters. The Stones seemed to concentrate more on entertaining.
What do you think, would a person's preference of one over the other be telling of someones personality?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtSRD9i1V...re=related
"Inside every Liberal there's a Totalitarian screaming to get out"

[Image: freddy_03.jpg]

Quote: JohnDG...
Quote:It was an awful mistake to characterize based upon religion. I should not judge any theist that way, I must remember what I said in order to change.
Reply
#2
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles
I like them both, but I like the Beatles much more than the Stones. It has nothing to do with lyrical content, though. I just like the Beatles music more than I like the Stones music. I don't think it says anything more about me, honestly.
Reply
#3
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles
I'd go one furhter, I've never enjoyed the Rolling Stones that much apart from a few songs. The Beatles on the other hand I enjoy a lot, almost as much as Pink Floyd.
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
Pastafarian
Reply
#4
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles
Neither, they're both rubbish Panic Old peoples music :p
[Image: cinjin_banner_border.jpg]
Reply
#5
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles
Quote:Really don't know where to put this one...

How about the arts section!
Reply
#6
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles
Why is this in Life Sciences???

*moved*

...and the Beatles are far better.
Reply
#7
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles
Never got the fuss about either. I guess at the time they were something new and edgy but meh, not now. Not my cup of tea at all.
Reply
#8
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles
(November 12, 2010 at 10:22 am)Darwinian Wrote: Neither, they're both rubbish Panic Old peoples music :p



[Image: blasphemer.jpg]

Reply
#9
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles
Neither.

Led Zeppelin & Pink Floyd FTW!!!
"How is it that a lame man does not annoy us while a lame mind does? Because a lame man recognizes that we are walking straight, while a lame mind says that it is we who are limping." - Pascal
Reply
#10
RE: Rolling Stones or Beatles
(November 12, 2010 at 10:22 am)Darwinian Wrote: Neither, they're both rubbish Panic Old peoples music :p
Old peoples' music! That's not old peoples' music. This is old peoples' music...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95aP0OWx4jY

"Inside every Liberal there's a Totalitarian screaming to get out"

[Image: freddy_03.jpg]

Quote: JohnDG...
Quote:It was an awful mistake to characterize based upon religion. I should not judge any theist that way, I must remember what I said in order to change.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Benatar did a cover of the Beatles... Brian37 0 366 February 23, 2019 at 4:05 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  Styx and stones well just Styx...... Brian37 15 1276 August 6, 2017 at 4:38 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  ☆ The Beatles Thread ☆ PhilosophicalZebra 13 2224 April 22, 2015 at 5:45 pm
Last Post: Crossless2.0



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)