Google removed the image viewing feature
February 17, 2018 at 3:53 am
(This post was last modified: February 17, 2018 at 4:29 am by WinterHold.)
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 31, 2026, 8:04 pm
Thread Rating:
|
Google removed the image viewing feature
|
 RE: Google removed the image viewing feature
February 17, 2018 at 5:01 am
(This post was last modified: February 17, 2018 at 5:03 am by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
So, you're mad at Google for making it difficult for people to steal things that don't belong to them? Perhaps you missed the 'Images may be subject to copyright' bit.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
BFD. One more step. The sites want hits, this is one way to get them. I started on a non-graphic WWW during Desert Shield. Had to download pictures to see them.
 (February 17, 2018 at 5:01 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: So, you're mad at Google for making it difficult for people to steal things that don't belong to them? Perhaps you missed the 'Images may be subject to copyright' bit. "Steal"? So, according to you, this is Ali Baba's cave, because all the members -or most; at least- use "stolen avatars". (February 17, 2018 at 9:40 am)AtlasS33 Wrote:(February 17, 2018 at 5:01 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: So, you're mad at Google for making it difficult for people to steal things that don't belong to them? Perhaps you missed the 'Images may be subject to copyright' bit. Yup. You notice that I don't have an avatar. Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
If they don't want you to use a picture they can put a redirect in so you get something you weren't expecting.
 RE: Google removed the image viewing feature
February 17, 2018 at 12:27 pm
(This post was last modified: February 17, 2018 at 12:29 pm by Minimalist.)
Anyone who wants to protect their "copyright" should not be posting those things on the web in the first place.
Besides, use Alta Vista or something other than google. 
Profoundly low resolution reproductions of copyrighted and/or other protected art seems like a silly thing to worry about.
10 X 15 pixel representation of the Mona Lisa is hardly going to detract from the value of the original. Particularly if the 10 X 15 pixel image isn't square on to the camera and is also out of focus since it's in the background. The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
The original is the image taken by the photographer in this case, their work, not the thing they're imaging.
Sites should be able to protect links and resources from being indexed by search engines quite easily, I don't see how Google has to go out of its way for this, but then again, Google is a private organization and can do whatever they want within their services. Also, I don't see this as censorship, rather corporates being stupid as usual.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads… | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| Big Lee Removed from US Capital | Jackie | 6 | 2348 |
December 21, 2020 at 9:10 pm Last Post: Jackie |
|
| Statue of Lee to be removed from Va capital. | Jackie | 161 | 36757 |
June 16, 2020 at 8:08 am Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama |
|
| Judge orders child removed from Lesbian couple's care | brewer | 55 | 16063 |
November 16, 2015 at 6:18 pm Last Post: Shining_Finger |
|
| Good job, google | abaris | 1 | 1074 |
July 4, 2015 at 1:23 pm Last Post: Salacious B. Crumb |
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
