Evolution

[Banned]

...making you from mud...
An unsurprising and completely uninformative declaration.

When life leaves the body, it returns to dust.

Without the power of life, there is no such thing as a living human being.
But you can argue with the hospital staff if you like, but they are facts.

When God created man, he assembled the body from the basic elements of the earth, and then gave him life. Until that moment there's the body but no being.

That power of life animates all things - whether atoms, plant life, animals or people.
It also governs and creates all physical laws.

Without this integral power, nothing can exist and nothing can function normally.

[The Grand Nudger]

When God created man, he assembled the body from the basic elements of the earth, and then gave him life. Until that moment there's the body but no being.

The trouble with this..is that it never happened.

I left out the poetry and breathless declarations of your pixie's superpowers, since they're irrelevant to evolution. We already know that you believe silly things, Banned, just as we were already aware that He Lives believes in silly things. No amount of either of you stating the articles of your faiths adds knowledge to the discussion.

[Succubus]

Thank you. It's always nice to know that we can ignore anything you have to say on a topic by demonstrating your complete ignorance of the topic with your first words.

Perhaps you should read up on abiogenesis. There you will find : "Primordial soup" hypothesis, Deep sea vent hypothesis, Clay hypothesis, Panspermia hypothesis, PAH world hypothesis, Radioactive beach hypothesis, etc. All of which can be termed as happenstance.

You didn't just shoot yourself in the foot, you shot yourself in the head.

Let me guess, English is not your first language?

---

Intelligent design? No. 'God did it' is not a theory.

A theory can be anything.
But once you make a theory the truth...then ! ?

I was never much taken with this Esperanto thingy.

[Amarok]

Perhaps you should read up on abiogenesis. There you will find : "Primordial soup" hypothesis, Deep sea vent hypothesis, Clay hypothesis, Panspermia hypothesis, PAH world hypothesis, Radioactive beach hypothesis, etc. All of which can be termed as happenstance.

No they are not . They are all theories of organic chemistry . Once again weasel words . 

A theory can be anything. 

But once you make a theory the truth...then ! 

Then you have no clue what a theory in science is

[Banned]

When God created man, he assembled the body from the basic elements of the earth, and then gave him life. Until that moment there's the body but no being.

The trouble with this..is that it never happened.

I left out the poetry and breathless declarations of your pixie's superpowers, since they're irrelevant to evolution. We already know that you believe silly things, Banned, just as we were already aware that He Lives believes in silly things. No amount of either of you stating the articles of your faiths adds knowledge to the discussion.

So you've never seen a half ape man, but you believe in the idea implicitly.
Surely the drawings of man apes in books can't be any better than a Watchtower illustration?

---

Banned wrote:
A theory can be anything. 

But once you make a theory the truth...then ! 

Then you have no clue what a theory in science is

A scientific theory is just that.
An intellectual postulation isn't necessarily of Divine origin. Unless Lawrence K is divine.

---

I was never much taken with this Esperanto thingy.

Me neither.

[Ravenshire]

Intelligent design? No. 'God did it' is not a theory.

A theory can be anything.
But once you make a theory the truth...then ! ?

You obviously have no fucking idea what the word theory means in the scientific community.

[Banned]

A theory can be anything.
But once you make a theory the truth...then ! ?

You obviously have no fucking idea what the word theory means in the scientific community.

Obviously not, but continue...

[Nay_Sayer]

Thank you. It's always nice to know that we can ignore anything you have to say on a topic by demonstrating your complete ignorance of the topic with your first words.

Perhaps you should read up on abiogenesis. There you will find : "Primordial soup" hypothesis, Deep sea vent hypothesis, Clay hypothesis, Panspermia hypothesis, PAH world hypothesis, Radioactive beach hypothesis, etc. All of which can be termed as happenstance.

Sounds a lot like made up science words invented to test my faith.

[Ravenshire]

Thank you. It's always nice to know that we can ignore anything you have to say on a topic by demonstrating your complete ignorance of the topic with your first words.

Perhaps you should read up on abiogenesis. There you will find : "Primordial soup" hypothesis, Deep sea vent hypothesis, Clay hypothesis, Panspermia hypothesis, PAH world hypothesis, Radioactive beach hypothesis, etc. All of which can be termed as happenstance.

And now you're just throwing shit at the wall in hopes that something will stick and make you look more informed than you are. Calling any of the proposed processes contained in any of those hypotheses mere happenstance is not only flaunting your ignorance for all to see, but an insult to people far more informed than you'll ever be.

[Amarok]

A scientific theory is just that.

An intellectual postulation isn't necessarily of Divine origin. Unless Lawrence K is divine.

Wrong it's not just an intellectual postulation 

And no it does not need to be of divine origins to be correct . That's just you throwing theistic rubbish into the mix .

---

So you've never seen a half ape man, but you believe in the idea implicitly. 
Surely the drawings of man apes in books can't be any better than a Watchtower illustration?

Wow your ignorance is impressive