Evolution

[Nay_Sayer]

Exactly, They make it up as they go. Additionally, science can't be trusted as we both know, Can you think of one thing science ever gave us? I can't

Fun fact: No fossils actually exist, they are all plastic stand-ins to fool the masses.

RAmen brother.

Science has given us a lot, and it's methods are reasonable when it comes to practical applications, but when it comes to theory, that's just what it is, until proven.

And fossils? Do they support evolution?  no, Fossils are fake, all fo them. Can't you read?
Whole creatures trapped in mud? No, That's impossible. I'd go further by sayign no creature can be trapped in the mud.

Think very carefully on this one.

Fossil layers - are supposed to represent time periods of millions of years. Remember whole bodies fossilized in often upright positions in the layers, and sharing layers as well. 

Let's say that one foot of a layer represents 1 million years of gradual desposition. How on earth does a fossil remain in tact partially buried for nearly a million years before it is finally covered? It doesn't.  I already said all the findings ae fake and meant to mislead us from the real chain of events. 

Bold mine.  We're on the same side although my faith has the correct age of the earth at 74,922 years, 95 days, 362 hours and your's does not.

We do believe in evolution but only on the micro, I'd challenge you or anyone else to show me little things adding up to big things, laughable.

[Amarok]

Then why is it only a modern idea?

1. It's not 

2. Just because we are the first to describe it in formal scientific terms has no bearing on the process itself .

[Gawdzilla Sama]

---

No, because there's no need for a question of cause.

Only if an effect has a cause.

And pure chemistry is the cause, so we've found it and can now move on. Well done, sir, well done!

[Amarok]

Science has given us a lot, and it's methods are reasonable when it comes to practical applications, but when it comes to theory, that's just what it is, until proven.

And fossils? Do they support evolution?  no, Fossils are fake, all fo them. Can't you read?
Whole creatures trapped in mud? No, That's impossible. I'd go further by sayign no creature can be trapped in the mud.

Think very carefully on this one.

Fossil layers - are supposed to represent time periods of millions of years. Remember whole bodies fossilized in often upright positions in the layers, and sharing layers as well. 

Let's say that one foot of a layer represents 1 million years of gradual desposition. How on earth does a fossil remain in tact partially buried for nearly a million years before it is finally covered? It doesn't.  I already said all the findings ae fake and meant to mislead us from the real chain of events. 

Bold mine.  We're on the same side although my faith has the correct age of the earth at 74,922 years, 95 days, 362 hours and your's does not.

We do believe in evolution but only on the micro, I'd challenge you or anyone else to show me little things adding up to big things, laughable.

Good  parody

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Darwin said "change through time". There is no crocoducks, just small changes that accumulate. We've had half a billion years to get to where we are, no need to rush things.

[chimp3]

Should we really refer to an oxygen molecule as a "self" because it combines with hydrogen? I think we should reserve "self" for processes that require a theory of mind.

Should we assume that the designed object has intelligence?

 Should we assume anything is "designed" unless it is a computer or car?

[Ravenshire]

Not understanding a cause is reason to seek it out, not reason to deny it.

You mean dump the answer and look for one?

To always look for an answer that's a better fit for the known facts. You know, the way science already does. POE.

Evolution is obvious at any point because it's a continual process .

Then why is it only a modern idea?

Because it's only relatively recently that we've had the science to study it properly. POE.

[Banned]

Science has given us a lot, and it's methods are reasonable when it comes to practical applications, but when it comes to theory, that's just what it is, until proven.

And fossils? Do they support evolution?  no, Fossils are fake, all fo them. Can't you read?
Whole creatures trapped in mud? No, That's impossible. I'd go further by sayign no creature can be trapped in the mud.

Think very carefully on this one.

Fossil layers - are supposed to represent time periods of millions of years. Remember whole bodies fossilized in often upright positions in the layers, and sharing layers as well. 

Let's say that one foot of a layer represents 1 million years of gradual desposition. How on earth does a fossil remain in tact partially buried for nearly a million years before it is finally covered? It doesn't.  I already said all the findings ae fake and meant to mislead us from the real chain of events. 

Bold mine.  We're on the same side although my faith has the correct age of the earth at 74,922 years, 95 days, 362 hours and your's does not.

We do believe in evolution but only on the micro, I'd challenge you or anyone else to show me little things adding up to big things, laughable.

You are best not to change a quote, it gets messy doesn't it?

---

Then why is it only a modern idea?

1. It's not 

2. Just because we are the first to describe it in formal scientific terms has no bearing on the process itself .

Should we expect some evolution ideas to show up in history?

[Amarok]

You are best not to change a quote, it gets messy doesn't it?

No not really and it's hilarious .

---

Should we expect some evolution ideas to show up in history?

1.It has 

2. Even if it had not it does not change the process of evolution .

[Banned]

---

Only if an effect has a cause.

And pure chemistry is the cause, so we've found it and can now move on. Well done, sir, well done!

And chemicals just exist by themselves don't they? In theory that is.
Like all building blocks, such as atoms - they just work and oscillate by themselves - endlessly?