I'm doing some integral exercises at the moment. Anyone want to verify that my solution is correct as seen in the following link?
https://pasteboard.co/Hgx8tXQ.png
https://pasteboard.co/Hgx8tXQ.png
Studying Mathematics Thread
|
I'm doing some integral exercises at the moment. Anyone want to verify that my solution is correct as seen in the following link?
https://pasteboard.co/Hgx8tXQ.png (April 14, 2018 at 2:07 am)Grandizer Wrote: I'm doing some integral exercises at the moment. Anyone want to verify that my solution is correct as seen in the following link? It's good. RE: Studying Mathematics Thread
April 14, 2018 at 10:41 am
(This post was last modified: April 14, 2018 at 10:48 am by robvalue.)
(April 14, 2018 at 2:07 am)Grandizer Wrote: I'm doing some integral exercises at the moment. Anyone want to verify that my solution is correct as seen in the following link? Yup looks good! I'd advise keeping the brackets in place after putting in the limits, as an extra step, to reduce the risk of dropping a minus sign somewhere: (3/5 + 6 + 16) - (-3/5 + 6 - 16) But you didn't drop any Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists. Index of useful threads and discussions Index of my best videos Quickstart guide to the forum
Yeah, the beauty of "writing" this out on a computer program instead of on paper is that I can easily remove some steps once I'm sure I got them right (just to have some space and/or to make the presentation look neater).
Anyway, just now I worked on the following problem: Find the area of the region between the curves of the functions x^-2 and -x^-3, over the interval x>1 ... which is the same as the interval (1,infinity). Here's my solution: https://pasteboard.co/HgHPq36.png Hopefully I got it right.
Yup, looks all good to me!
This kind of question shows the awesome power of mathematics (and specifically calculus). Imagine trying to approach this without it. Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists. Index of useful threads and discussions Index of my best videos Quickstart guide to the forum
For the indefinite integral evaluation, forgot to include the constant c. Not a big deal as the final answer is unaffected by not including it, but still a mistake.
(April 15, 2018 at 9:21 am)Grandizer Wrote: For the indefinite integral evaluation, forgot to include the constant c. Not a big deal as the final answer is unaffected by not including it, but still a mistake. I would put the integral calculation inline with the limit. In that way, no constant is required. Just the evaluation from 1 to q.
The indefinite integral of 1/x is ln|x|+c ... x!=0.
Here's to show how this works for negative values of x, keeping in mind that the indefinite integral is the antiderivative in general. When x is negative, |x| = -x. d/dx(ln|x|+c) = (1/(-x))*(-1)+0 = 1/x |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
Are you into mathematics? Do you have any cake? | ErGingerbreadMandude | 71 | 11410 |
February 9, 2017 at 2:45 pm Last Post: Kernel Sohcahtoa |
|
Is mathematics discovered, developed, or both? | Macoleco | 26 | 4757 |
December 3, 2016 at 11:12 am Last Post: Jehanne |
|
Can mathematics act causally? | Freedom of thought | 6 | 2550 |
May 30, 2014 at 12:53 pm Last Post: MindForgedManacle |
|
Imaginary friends of mathematics. | Anymouse | 6 | 4858 |
March 20, 2012 at 2:04 pm Last Post: mannaka |
|
Mathematics and the Universe | Purple Rabbit | 77 | 33589 |
January 10, 2009 at 6:27 am Last Post: DD_8630 |
|
Indeterminism in mathematics | josef rosenkranz | 9 | 7213 |
September 27, 2008 at 11:20 am Last Post: josef rosenkranz |