RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 9, 2018 at 4:57 am
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 31, 2026, 6:26 pm
Thread Rating:
|
Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
|
|
RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 9, 2018 at 5:02 am
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2018 at 5:03 am by Amarok.)
![]()
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 9, 2018 at 6:57 am
RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 9, 2018 at 7:15 am
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2018 at 7:27 am by Huggy Bear.)
RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 9, 2018 at 7:26 am
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2018 at 7:32 am by I_am_not_mafia.)
RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 9, 2018 at 7:39 am
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2018 at 7:44 am by Huggy Bear.)
'UFO' doesn't mean 'alien spacecraft'...
Sad that I have to explain that to someone who claims to be a scientist. RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 9, 2018 at 7:45 am
Light being recorded above a man's head does not mean God.
RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 9, 2018 at 7:53 am
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2018 at 7:57 am by Huggy Bear.)
I believe person that examined the negative used the term 'supernatural' im reference to the light, seeing how there was no explanation for the light being there...
Then you'd have to dismiss eyewitness testimony of a woman who says she saw a hovering light. RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 9, 2018 at 8:01 am
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2018 at 8:03 am by robvalue.)
If no one can explain the light then... you get to make up whatever conclusion you want?
This is called an argument from ignorance. I can make up a conclusion too. It's Odin. He makes "supernatural light" sometimes. At best you have unexplained light. The rest is your imagination and excessive confirmation bias. We don't have to have an explanation to point out that your explanation is a total non-sequitur. RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 9, 2018 at 8:06 am
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2018 at 8:06 am by I_am_not_mafia.)
(March 9, 2018 at 7:53 am)Huggy74 Wrote: I believe person that examined the negative used the term 'supernatural' im reference to the light, seeing how there was no explanation for the light being there... He didn't use the term 'supernatural' in the image you linked to. This is an example of you seeing what you want to see. "no explanation" does not mean there aren't perfectly simple and natural causes that could be explained if we had more data available. All the paper says is that he cannot find any obvious signs of tampering. That is not the same as saying that it wasn't tampered with or that light was not deliberately used to create a halo effect, or even that it wasn't an accident. Quote:Then you'd have to dismiss eyewitness testimony of a woman who says she saw a hovering light. Provide the details first and stop being intellectually dishonest: https://atheistforums.org/thread-53768-p...pid1713658 |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)


![[Image: CPSHo0NUAAAXe-f.png]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CPSHo0NUAAAXe-f.png)

![[Image: f468789592ecd0bfce6da487882c980e--funny-...y-pics.jpg]](https://i.pinimg.com/236x/f4/68/78/f468789592ecd0bfce6da487882c980e--funny-sayings-funny-pics.jpg)