The SPLC - All White at the Top

[John V]

The SPLC makes a living off race baiting.

I not really a fan of the SPLC myself, so that's not really a retort to the point I made.

I'm not a fan of the author (have no clue who it is), so your post wasn't a retort to the point I made.

[Crossless2.0]

Looks like that author has a bit of a racebaiting fetish, if you look at his other articles.

The SPLC makes a living off race baiting.

---

Gotcha.  Whites are not allowed to fight for civil rights.  Thanks for your input.

Seems to me if they cared about minorities they'd hire minorities for the top positions and put themselves out of jobs. Unless you think there aren't enough minorities who are both qualified, and value the SPLC's work.

Race baiting . . . if they valued minorities . . .

It's actually possible to look at their current docket of pending cases, as well as those cases they have pursued in the past, to see where they stand . . . you know, just in case you really want to get into a pissing match over who better values minorities -- the SPLC or those shit-kicker faux intellectuals you seem drawn to. Good luck with that.

As for their hiring practices, I'm neither privy to what goes on there nor do I have inside information about their pool of applicants. And neither do you. So, your point?

[FatAndFaithless]

I not really a fan of the SPLC myself, so that's not really a retort to the point I made.

I'm not a fan of the author (have no clue who it is), so your post wasn't a retort to the point I made.

But you are bringing up a shitty article written by a random guy with an agenda, so I don't see why you think it's worth making a thread about.

[Aegon]

I not really a fan of the SPLC myself, so that's not really a retort to the point I made.

I'm not a fan of the author (have no clue who it is), so your post wasn't a retort to the point I made.

Some light reading for you

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Sail..._criticism

[Silver]

Maybe the point is that the SPLC needs to diversify racially.

[vorlon13]

I'll be damned.

A Lord God Almighty supporter whining about His curse upon the Hammites.


We do indeed live in a topsy turvy world.

[Little lunch]

Those black board members were paid actors.

[Amarok]

1. The SPLC does not make a living off race baiting they make a living off fighting for minority rights. I know you would consider that race baiting consider the kind of person you are. 

2. So were just going to ignore all the good they do and engage in race baiting because some racist fucktard says so . Gotcha .

3. Their care of minorities has fuck all to do with them hiring minorities . It's to do with fighting for their rights . So again race baiting . 

Gotta love these kind of threads it really shows the nature of the author .

[John V]

As for their hiring practices, I'm neither privy to what goes on there nor do I have inside information about their pool of applicants. And neither do you. So, your point?

As noted above, the logical possibilities seem to be:
- they don't think minority applicants are qualified, or
- qualified minorities don't value the SPLC and so aren't applying

---

I'm not a fan of the author (have no clue who it is), so your post wasn't a retort to the point I made.

Some light reading for you

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Sail..._criticism

Seems from the upper management team that the SPLC secretly agrees with him.

---

Maybe the point is that the SPLC needs to diversify racially.

Yep. There are many organizations which have nothing to do with civil rights, yet are concerned about diversity.

You'd think an organization supposedly devoted to minority rights would have been a leader on that.

[Amarok]

As noted above, the logical possibilities seem to be:

Or no minorities applied for the job at the top . But still supports the organization as a whole. Your logic sucks 

Seems from the upper management team that the SPLC secretly agrees with him.

Accusing the SPLC of race realism fuck off

Yep. There are many organizations which have nothing to do with civil rights, yet are concerned about diversity.

You'd think an organization supposedly devoted to minority rights would have been a leader on that.

Why? As i said their list of cases and causes prove the merit of the organization not their hiring practices

I know you righties have an axe to grind against the SPLC. But this is just a sad attack.