Posts: 1585
Threads: 8
Joined: November 27, 2018
Reputation:
6
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
January 3, 2019 at 2:23 am
(January 3, 2019 at 2:20 am)Amarok Wrote: (January 3, 2019 at 1:53 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: You're not the determining factor. Sorry, try again. If you don't like my definition offer up your own. Less being a part of the problem, and more being a part of the solution.
So here's your chance. Provide a better definition? If your definition is better, then please point out why it is better and why it should be accepted instead? So again no answer and it's not my job to provide definition
So my definition isn't good enough, but you have no definition at all because it's not your job. But I suppose it's your job to tell me I need to provide a different definition? No thanks. Not interested. I'll stick with M-W if you don't have anything better for me to consider.
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
January 3, 2019 at 2:50 am
(January 3, 2019 at 2:23 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: (January 3, 2019 at 2:20 am)Amarok Wrote: So again no answer and it's not my job to provide definition
So my definition isn't good enough, but you have no definition at all because it's not your job. But I suppose it's your job to tell me I need to provide a different definition? No thanks. Not interested. I'll stick with M-W if you don't have anything better for me to consider. So you stick with the antiquate definition then try and push it back on me . When that fails you insist on the inadequate definition . Then demand I give a better one..Lol right
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Posts: 13901
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
January 3, 2019 at 5:39 am
I can see now tothemax's argument is "I don't understand and shall replace my ignorance with the word god"
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 2872
Threads: 8
Joined: October 4, 2017
Reputation:
22
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
January 3, 2019 at 9:00 am
(This post was last modified: January 3, 2019 at 9:00 am by Abaddon_ire.)
(January 3, 2019 at 2:23 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: (January 3, 2019 at 2:20 am)Amarok Wrote: So again no answer and it's not my job to provide definition
So my definition isn't good enough, but you have no definition at all because it's not your job. But I suppose it's your job to tell me I need to provide a different definition? No thanks. Not interested. I'll stick with M-W if you don't have anything better for me to consider.
If you want to make an argument then make it. Don't dishonestly attempt to goad others into making your argument for you.
(January 3, 2019 at 2:23 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: (January 3, 2019 at 2:20 am)Amarok Wrote: So again no answer and it's not my job to provide definition
So my definition isn't good enough, but you have no definition at all because it's not your job. But I suppose it's your job to tell me I need to provide a different definition? No thanks. Not interested. I'll stick with M-W if you don't have anything better for me to consider.
If you want to make an argument then make it. Don't dishonestly attempt to goad others into making your argument for you.
Posts: 1585
Threads: 8
Joined: November 27, 2018
Reputation:
6
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
January 3, 2019 at 10:30 am
(This post was last modified: January 3, 2019 at 10:42 am by T0 Th3 M4X.)
(January 3, 2019 at 2:50 am)Amarok Wrote: (January 3, 2019 at 2:23 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: So my definition isn't good enough, but you have no definition at all because it's not your job. But I suppose it's your job to tell me I need to provide a different definition? No thanks. Not interested. I'll stick with M-W if you don't have anything better for me to consider. So you stick with the antiquate definition then try and push it back on me . When that fails you insist on the inadequate definition . Then demand I give a better one..Lol right
Sorry, but my definition is adequate, and seeing as to how you can't even come up with one, then you're really not in a position to critique me.
What definition are you proposing instead? Why is it better and why should I accept it as such? If you don't want to provide anything, then no reason for me to reconsider.
(January 3, 2019 at 5:39 am)downbeatplumb Wrote: I can see now tothemax's argument is "I don't understand and shall replace my ignorance with the word god"
Nope, sorry. If I wanted to replace "ignorance" then I would just swap it out for "downbeatplumb."
You keep wanting to tell me I'm wrong, but no explanation or demonstration as to what makes your view right. That is ignorance.
If you have nothing, and you haven't for almost a week now, then there's nothing to consider.
(January 3, 2019 at 9:00 am)Abaddon_ire Wrote: (January 3, 2019 at 2:23 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: So my definition isn't good enough, but you have no definition at all because it's not your job. But I suppose it's your job to tell me I need to provide a different definition? No thanks. Not interested. I'll stick with M-W if you don't have anything better for me to consider.
If you want to make an argument then make it. Don't dishonestly attempt to goad others into making your argument for you.
(January 3, 2019 at 2:23 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: So my definition isn't good enough, but you have no definition at all because it's not your job. But I suppose it's your job to tell me I need to provide a different definition? No thanks. Not interested. I'll stick with M-W if you don't have anything better for me to consider.
If you want to make an argument then make it. Don't dishonestly attempt to goad others into making your argument for you.
Same goes for you. Been waiting on your argument for days. Haven't tried to goad anybody, but tell whatever lies you like. I don't mind atheists but the ones who have nothing, offer nothing, and whine when others do are boring.
About a month here and still no evidence for nothing coming from something, or inorganic matter turning into anything organic. I'm guessing there won't be anything in another month either.
Posts: 13901
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
January 3, 2019 at 10:53 am
(January 3, 2019 at 10:30 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote:
(January 3, 2019 at 5:39 am)downbeatplumb Wrote: I can see now tothemax's argument is "I don't understand and shall replace my ignorance with the word god"
Nope, sorry. If I wanted to replace "ignorance" then I would just swap it out for "downbeatplumb."
You keep wanting to tell me I'm wrong, but no explanation or demonstration as to what makes your view right. That is ignorance.
If you have nothing, and you haven't for almost a week now, then there's nothing to consider.
You have literally given me nothing in return for all the explanations I and others have given, I have asked time and time again for a description of a god and how god did these things and you have given nothing.
Let me say again that to say god did something is not enough if you provide no evidence for that or even a good definition of what a god is.
As far as I can see god is just a cover for you not knowing something.
You don't know, therefore god.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 2872
Threads: 8
Joined: October 4, 2017
Reputation:
22
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
January 3, 2019 at 11:23 am
(January 3, 2019 at 10:30 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote:
Same goes for you. Been waiting on your argument for days. Haven't tried to goad anybody, but tell whatever lies you like. I don't mind atheists but the ones who have nothing, offer nothing, and whine when others do are boring.
About a month here and still no evidence for nothing coming from something, or inorganic matter turning into anything organic. I'm guessing there won't be anything in another month either.
I am not the one proposing a magical sky fairy, you are. Make your case or admit you cannot.
Something from nothing has been handed to you several times.
Organic material arising from inorganic is old hat. Start with Miller-Urey and follow the research.
Posts: 67172
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
January 3, 2019 at 11:49 am
It's not like god botherers have a problem with life coming from non life. They just demand that the process involve a wizard and a mudhole, lol.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 2872
Threads: 8
Joined: October 4, 2017
Reputation:
22
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
January 3, 2019 at 12:06 pm
(January 3, 2019 at 11:49 am)Gae Bolga Wrote: It's not like god botherers have a problem with life coming from non life. They just demand that the process involve a wizard and a mudhole, lol.
With added spare ribs and talking snakes and donkeys.
It all works with a dollop of god spit.
Posts: 30726
Threads: 2123
Joined: May 24, 2012
Reputation:
71
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
January 3, 2019 at 12:53 pm
(January 3, 2019 at 5:39 am)downbeatplumb Wrote: I can see now tothemax's argument is "I don't understand and shall replace my ignorance with the word god"
Theists of every religion, bar none, worldwide, depending on individual, can and are capable of accepting science, but only and up until it conflicts with their beliefs, and that is where the cherry picking begins.
|
