DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[LadyForCamus]

Creatards,
Explain how you have determined that the properties of (5 % ) of this universe, which is all you know about,
apply to all of reality which would not have been a part of this universe. Take your time.

In case you missed it, information was found in DNA.  A Creator exists.  Debate is over.

Into every generation a slayer is born: one girl in all the world, a chosen one. She alone will wield the strength and skill to fight the vampires, demons, and the forces of darkness; to stop the spread of their evil and the swell of their number. She is the slayer.

Prove me wrong.

[T0 Th3 M4X]

In case you missed it, information was found in DNA.  A Creator exists.  Debate is over.

Into every generation a slayer is born: one girl in all the world, a chosen one. She alone will wield the strength and skill to fight the vampires, demons, and the forces of darkness; to stop the spread of their evil and the swell of their number. She is the slayer.

Prove me wrong.

It is really you?  Now I want an autograph!

[Bucky Ball]

Show me some dark energy and dark matter.  If it makes up approx 95 percent of the universe, you shouldn't have much trouble proving it, now should you?  Also, show me how it was compressed into a single point.  Even on a small scale.  For instance, take the mass of a small rock (any will do), say 2 inches in diameter and  and compress it down to a needle point.  If you can extrapolate the process even on a small scale, then I'll have to admit you may have something.   No big deal if it's unstable and explodes afterwards.  Just get it there and prove you did it.

Don't be such an ignoramus, Church Lady. 
Get back to your prayers, insults, pearl clutching and Babble verses. 
https://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/fo...ark-energy

---

In case you missed it, information was found in DNA. A Creator exists. Debate is over.

Cool.
Then you're going away then, and this fucked up thread is done ?
Buh bye.

[pocaracas]

To which I asked why is human intelligence not self sufficient?

If it was self-sufficient, then we wouldn't be having this discussion and you wouldn't be asking me this question.

Allow me an analogy:

[Stealing this from elsewhere...]
If the Earth was actually round, there wouldn't be any flat-eathers.

[T0 Th3 M4X]

Show me some dark energy and dark matter.  If it makes up approx 95 percent of the universe, you shouldn't have much trouble proving it, now should you?  Also, show me how it was compressed into a single point.  Even on a small scale.  For instance, take the mass of a small rock (any will do), say 2 inches in diameter and  and compress it down to a needle point.  If you can extrapolate the process even on a small scale, then I'll have to admit you may have something.   No big deal if it's unstable and explodes afterwards.  Just get it there and prove you did it.

Don't be such an ignoramus, Church Lady. 
Get back to your prayers, insults, pearl clutching and Babble verses. 
https://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/fo...ark-energy

---

In case you missed it, information was found in DNA.  A Creator exists.  Debate is over.

Cool.
Then you're going away then, and this fucked up thread is done ?
Buh bye.

Show me.  I don't care about links that say something may exist.  Maybe a video on YT of someone actually displaying it or it could even be you showing it.  Just so there's no doubt you have the item and it's real.  Should be no prob since you say it's approx 95 percent of the universe.  I'll be waiting Cupcake.

---

If it was self-sufficient, then we wouldn't be having this discussion and you wouldn't be asking me this question.

Allow me an analogy:

[Stealing this from elsewhere...]
If the Earth was actually round, there wouldn't be any flat-eathers.

The orientation is spherical.  As such, we know it still has flat areas and much of it isn't completely round.

[CDF47]

In case you missed it, information was found in DNA.  A Creator exists.  Debate is over.

Into every generation a slayer is born: one girl in all the world, a chosen one. She alone will wield the strength and skill to fight the vampires, demons, and the forces of darkness; to stop the spread of their evil and the swell of their number. She is the slayer.

Prove me wrong.

It's a different type of argument.

---

Show me some dark energy and dark matter.  If it makes up approx 95 percent of the universe, you shouldn't have much trouble proving it, now should you?  Also, show me how it was compressed into a single point.  Even on a small scale.  For instance, take the mass of a small rock (any will do), say 2 inches in diameter and  and compress it down to a needle point.  If you can extrapolate the process even on a small scale, then I'll have to admit you may have something.   No big deal if it's unstable and explodes afterwards.  Just get it there and prove you did it.

Don't be such an ignoramus, Church Lady. 
Get back to your prayers, insults, pearl clutching and Babble verses. 
https://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/fo...ark-energy

---

In case you missed it, information was found in DNA.  A Creator exists.  Debate is over.

Cool.
Then you're going away then, and this fucked up thread is done ?
Buh bye.

No, because there will be more that try to deny that fact.

[pocaracas]

Allow me an analogy:

[Stealing this from elsewhere...]
If the Earth was actually round, there wouldn't be any flat-eathers.

The orientation is spherical.  As such, we know it still has flat areas and much of it isn't completely round.

See how you managed to find a reason, there?
Care to try again on this one?:

No. If the "super intelligence" is completely self sufficient, then no need for a regress. That was what I was stating.

To which I asked why is human intelligence not self sufficient?

[T0 Th3 M4X]

The orientation is spherical.  As such, we know it still has flat areas and much of it isn't completely round.

See how you managed to find a reason, there?
Care to try again on this one?:

To which I asked why is human intelligence not self sufficient?

Some things are understood even though they're not exact.  Sometimes you need to be exact.

I already answered the sufficiency question.  Humans have the potential for error.  It doesn't mean we have to err in something, but why increase your chances if you don't know something?  I think it's good that it's not sufficient, because it can drive us to make it more sufficient by learning.  Sometimes that requires making mistakes (trial and error).

[pocaracas]

See how you managed to find a reason, there?
Care to try again on this one?:

Some things are understood even though they're not exact.  Sometimes you need to be exact.

I already answered the sufficiency question.  Humans have the potential for error.  It doesn't mean we have to err in something, but why increase your chances if you don't know something?  I think it's good that it's not sufficient, because it can drive us to make it more sufficient by learning.  Sometimes that requires making mistakes (trial and error).

So... you're saying that human intelligence is, somehow, incrementally, increasing in capability, huh?

[GUBU]

I’m pretty sure CDF is a bot at this point.

Pros-le-tize! Pros-le-tize! Pros-le-tize!