Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 3, 2026, 7:52 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 10 Vote(s) - 1.8 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(June 6, 2018 at 2:23 am)Abaddon_ire Wrote:
(June 5, 2018 at 9:56 pm)CDF47 Wrote: He just always was and He is and He always will be.  He transcends this universe/space time.

Apologies. I didn't realise that you were a muslim.

I am Christian.  Really different religion from Islam.  They do not recognize Jesus as the Son of God which He is.
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
He transcends time and space, but he gets very upset about knobs going into bums. He's more prudish than England, and that takes some doing.
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.

Inuit Proverb

Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
Quote:Enemies or civilians used in that way are referred to as human shields or as collateral damage.
Nope shields would be keeping them near your troops as a protective wall . I'm talking about about sending them forward against their own lines by coercion or trickery to absorb incoming fire or disrupt their front formations .And they can both be collateral and cannon fodder as the distinction between civilian and enemy combatant in more ancient times was not a clean cut idea.
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.

Inuit Proverb

Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(June 6, 2018 at 3:07 am)Tizheruk Wrote:
Quote:Enemies or civilians used in that way are referred to as human shields or as collateral damage.
Nope shields would be keeping them near your troops as a protective wall . I'm talking about about sending them forward against their own lines by coercion or trickery  to absorb incoming fire  or disrupt their front formations .And they can both be collateral and cannon fodder as the distinction between civilian and enemy combatant  in more ancient times was not a clean cut idea.

I don't believe that fits the definition.
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
Cannon fodder, can also be used as a term to mean a form of cheap and easy entertainment. For example, the words of a foolish man can be used as cannon fodder (cheap entertainment) to give the rest of the forum members reading this pathetic thread, something to laugh at.

Every post you make in this thread, CDF, is therefore, considered by me, to be cannon fodder.

And for your information, CDF, the definition you provided, doesn't fit either. At least not in the context that I meant.

But you already knew that. You were just looking for any excuse to stray away from answering the questions put to you.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand. 
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work.  If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now.  Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
Quote:I don't believe that fits the definition
Is it using a group of low value assets(enemies and civilians ) in a driving offensive ahead of your higher value forces (setting aside the civilian /combatant disction which is a recent development ) to disrupt a enemy lines and formations and absorb ordnance ? the answer is yes thus fodder .
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.

Inuit Proverb

Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(June 6, 2018 at 3:23 am)Joods Wrote: Cannon fodder, can also be used as a term to mean a form of cheap and easy entertainment. For example, the words of a foolish man can be used as cannon fodder (cheap entertainment) to give the rest of the forum members reading this pathetic thread, something to laugh at.

Every post you make in this thread, CDF, is therefore, considered by me, to be cannon fodder.

And for your information, CDF, the definition you provided,  doesn't fit either.  At least not in the context that I meant.

But you already knew that. You were just looking for any excuse to stray away from answering the  questions put to you.

What question do you have now?
Reply



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Spontaneous assembly of DNA from precursor molecules prior to life. Anomalocaris 4 2742 April 4, 2019 at 6:12 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Music and DNA tahaadi 4 3041 September 29, 2018 at 4:35 am
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  Dr. Long proves life after death or no? Manga 27 13887 April 27, 2017 at 4:59 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  "DNA Labelling!" aka American Idiots Davka 28 14229 February 4, 2015 at 1:45 am
Last Post: Aractus
  A new atheist's theories on meta-like physical existence freedeepthink 14 7291 October 1, 2014 at 1:35 am
Last Post: freedeepthink
  Do the multiverse theories prove the existence of... Mudhammam 3 3449 January 12, 2014 at 12:03 pm
Last Post: Esquilax
  Yeti DNA sequenced Doubting Thomas 2 2513 October 17, 2013 at 7:17 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Science Proves God Pahu 3 3143 August 2, 2012 at 4:54 pm
Last Post: Jackalope
  New Human DNA Strain Detected Minimalist 10 7549 July 27, 2012 at 7:24 pm
Last Post: popeyespappy
  Junk DNA and creationism little_monkey 0 2928 December 3, 2011 at 9:23 am
Last Post: little_monkey



Users browsing this thread: 76 Guest(s)