DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Deesse23]

Well for one, it put's the food and that kind of stuff with relationship to the families of the reminders and how the Messengers were appointed, and when it talks about food in 16th Surah, it also talks about how mules, horses, etc were all made for us to have authority over.

Mules werent created. Mules are a crossbreed from horse/ass and are infertile. Ergo this "species" wouldnt be able to survive in nature.We are breeding them. That they cant produce offspring also supports the theory of evolution (*waves at ignorant Eve*).

Just sayin´

[Everena]

They have proven that atoms and electons can exist in 2 places at one. I am not claiming my actual flesh exists in another universe. You understand that right?

If the MWI is true, "you" do exist in other universes/worlds. Either way, you weren't being factual by misquoting that article.

I did not misquote the article. I was talking about what I believe. I was also talking about the article and the article discusses badteria in superposition and quantum entanglement.

[I_am_not_mafia]

I did not misquote the article. I was talking about what I believe. I was also talking about the article and the article discusses badteria in superposition and quantum entanglement.

Typical theist tactic of talking about something completely unrelated hoping that we'll somehow be convinced that this means that they are right about everything.

[Everena]

Well for one, it put's the food and that kind of stuff with relationship to the families of the reminders and how the Messengers were appointed, and when it talks about food in 16th Surah, it also talks about how mules, horses, etc were all made for us to have authority over.

Mules werent created. Mules are a crossbreed from horse/ass and are infertile. Ergo this "species" wouldnt be able to survive in nature.We are breeding them. That they cant produce offspring also supports the theory of evolution (*waves at ignorant Eve*).
Everena: It's pronouced Eh-vuh or Eh-vuh-renn-uh. And I am not denying evolution, just saying that there is very little evidence to support one species "turning into" an entirely different species. Almost no evidence, lots of conjecture and speculation. Lots and lots of evidence of adaption however, which is part of the theory of evol
Just sayin´

[GrandizerII]

If the MWI is true, "you" do exist in other universes/worlds. Either way, you weren't being factual by misquoting that article.

I did not misquote the article. I was talking about what I believe. I was also talking about the article and the article discusses badteria in superposition and quantum entanglement.

No, it doesn't discuss bacteria being observed in superposition.

[Everena]

I did not misquote the article. I was talking about what I believe. I was also talking about the article and the article discusses badteria in superposition and quantum entanglement.

No, it doesn't discuss bacteria being observed in superposition.

Yes, it does, start to finish. Sorry you can't read, It discusses both. I have had enough of this ridiculous argument. Good bye 

[GrandizerII]

No, it doesn't discuss bacteria being observed in superposition.

Yes, it does, start to finish. Sorry you can't read, It discusses both. I have had enough of this ridiculous argument. Good bye 

It really doesn't ...

[pocaracas]

[I_am_not_mafia]

And I am not denying evolution, just saying that there is very little evidence to support one species "turning into" an entirely different species.

Which shows that you do not understand evolution and are only concerned with dismissing it.

[Amarok]

Everena: No, you really really aren't

Yes i am and no your not 

Everena: So that was a lie you made up about me.

Nope and i still challenge you to back your assertion (you can't)

Everena: No, you really don't. You are uneducated  and it really shows

Nope quite the contrary 

Everena: Yes you are like the straw man in the Wizard of Oz. If you only had a brain. 

Nope but it perfectly describes what your doing 

Everena: You are the one making a strawman argument you ignorant fool. So your answer is no, you have no valid explanation. You lose again.

Nope you are and i already out that fallcy as well as the rest . You lose again .

Everena: Evolution is not the first cause of anything.  I'll try to make it simple for you . Evolution is a process that presumably happened. Evolution did not presumably happen until after life began. In order for new life to survive, guess what? Food had to be here.  You lose

Wrong . One key factor of evolution is how species came up with adaption to utilize their environment And while it's true evolution does nor describe the origins of life ( that's Abiogenisis ) it does cover how and why species are the way they are BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT . So you lose again .

Everena: You are the one making a strawman argument you ignorant fool. So your answer is no, you have no valid explanation. You lose again

 Nope you continually repeat the same fallacies . So you lose again 

Everena: A-Bio-Genesis is not that well evidenced and simply states "It just all happened naturally" Really? Naturally? Define naturally in that context then. It's vague and it means nothing so guess what? You lose again.

Yes it is well evidenced and it doesn't just say "It just all happened naturally" so more straw men . Thus your challenge is invalid and you again lose . Not even covering the rest of the arguments from ignorance that underline your reasoning .

Everena: False. All science can currently do is identify parts of the brain that we experience consciousness in. Neuroscientists all over the world are working on solving the mystery of how we have consciousnees right now. No one has any clue why we would be conscious and that falls outside the realm of science anyway. And so, you lose again. And i[b]t is than in your sentence, not   then- You're welcome.[/b]

Assertions so you lose again and it's desperation to think correcting my spelling means anything 

Everena-Then you do believe in God, because God is higher intelligence.

Nope i'm agnostic on the matter . But even if they exist that really means nothing toward our origins .

So again you repeat the same fallacies and fallacies are an instant loss .

---

And I am not denying evolution, just saying that there is very little evidence to support one species "turning into" an entirely different species.

Holy shit this is creationist derp 101

---

Yes, it does, start to finish. Sorry you can't read, It discusses both. I have had enough of this ridiculous argument. Good bye  

Yes i can see why reading your own arguments would have that effect . They are ridiculous .