(May 14, 2018 at 3:03 pm)CDF47 Wrote:Nope, answer the question asked. Does your god interact with the real world today? Yes or no?(May 14, 2018 at 2:56 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: Why can nobody detect and measure that?
His proof is in the creation, his signature is in the body and cells of living creatures and the construct of the super-symmetrical universe.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 4, 2026, 3:05 am
Thread Rating:
|
DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
|
(May 14, 2018 at 3:36 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote:(May 14, 2018 at 3:03 pm)CDF47 Wrote: His proof is in the creation, his signature is in the body and cells of living creatures and the construct of the super-symmetrical universe.Nope, answer the question asked. Does your god interact with the real world today? Yes or no? Yes. RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
May 14, 2018 at 3:39 pm
(This post was last modified: May 14, 2018 at 3:39 pm by Mister Agenda.)
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
(May 14, 2018 at 3:35 pm)CDF47 Wrote:(May 14, 2018 at 3:30 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: If it was sequence alone that was important, you could do the same thing with different chemicals, but you can't. If it was sequence that was important, you wouldn't have so much repetition just because certain of the components of DNA are necessary to keep the strands chemically stable, making it less efficient at memory storage than it would be if a qualified human had designed it. ORLY? Explain the 74 amino acids found in the Murchison meteorite. RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
May 14, 2018 at 3:40 pm
(This post was last modified: May 14, 2018 at 3:41 pm by Mister Agenda.)
CDF47 Wrote:Tizheruk Wrote:Appeal to consequences Care to estimate how many times a suicide in America has been found with a Bible in the room? CDF47 Wrote:Tizheruk Wrote:I'm calling bullocks on this . It doesn't even make any sense . Well, if you heard a story, it must be true, eh?
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
CDF47 Wrote:Don't want to talk about DNA spell checkers? Is that to far down the design evidence for you? Nope, they're not miraculously more compelling of acceptance of ID than other parts of DNA. It's a waste of time for you to keep linking amazing new factoids about DNA. That's not what will convince us. To have a chance of convincing us, you have to do better than this: 1. DNA is amazingly complex! 2. Nothing. 3. Therefore it must have been consciously designed! The middle part is important. It's the part where you tell us WHY something being so complex means it must have been designed. Complexity isn't even a criteria for human design, almost everything we design is orders of magnitude less complex that what is found in nature.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 22 Guest(s)



