Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 23, 2024, 12:26 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 10 Vote(s) - 1.8 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(November 11, 2018 at 6:04 pm)Everena Wrote:
(November 11, 2018 at 6:03 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: You mean beyond the rather obvious stars in the sky?

Yes, from a galaxy light years away.

[Image: 93O5Abp.jpg]
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(November 11, 2018 at 6:04 pm)Everena Wrote: Did you read the article?

Yes. It's nothing that different from other energy discovered. 
The fact you think it is, shows how little you know.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell  Popcorn

Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist 
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(November 11, 2018 at 6:09 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote:
(November 11, 2018 at 6:04 pm)Everena Wrote: Did you read the article?

Yes. It's nothing that different from other energy discovered. 
The fact you think it is, shows how little you know.

No, the article clearly states that it is different.
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(November 11, 2018 at 6:11 pm)Everena Wrote:
(November 11, 2018 at 6:09 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote: Yes. It's nothing that different from other energy discovered. 
The fact you think it is, shows how little you know.

No, the article clearly states that it is different.

No, the article clearly states that it may be different, not that it is.
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(November 11, 2018 at 6:13 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:
(November 11, 2018 at 6:11 pm)Everena Wrote: No, the article clearly states that it is different.

No, the article clearly states that it may be different, not that it is.

No it doesn't. 
"Fast radio bursts were first discovered in 2007, and scientists have been trying to ascertain their origin and cause ever since.

There are currently 18 known FRBs, but they were all detected by non-specialist radio telescopes that were unable to narrow down their origin to a precise location, according to researchers at McGill University."

Scientists discover all kinds of things they never detected before. It's a RADIO(range) signal. 
That's hardly anything new. You know what a radio is ? 

Wow. Just wow. 
Did you take high shcool science ?
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell  Popcorn

Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist 
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(November 11, 2018 at 6:16 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote:
(November 11, 2018 at 6:13 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: No, the article clearly states that it may be different, not that it is.

No it doesn't. 
"Fast radio bursts were first discovered in 2007, and scientists have been trying to ascertain their origin and cause ever since.

There are currently 18 known FRBs, but they were all detected by non-specialist radio telescopes that were unable to narrow down their origin to a precise location, according to researchers at McGill University."

Scientists discover all kinds of things they never detected before. It's a RADIO(range) signal. 
That's hardly anything new. You know what a radio is ? 

Wow. Just wow. 
Did you take high shcool science ?

Quote:While these are the most common explanations for FRBs, Bryan Butler of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory pointed out that they may not apply to this particular signal.

"We do have to keep in mind that this FRB is the only one known to repeat, so it may be physically different from the others," he said in a statement.

And yes, I took science classes in high school. Did you take English in high school?
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(November 11, 2018 at 6:07 pm)Everena Wrote: Yes and I believe we are eternal and infinite and that we exist here and in another universe in superposition.

That's all nice and everything.  
It doesn't feed starving babies or cure cancer. 

I believe the moon is made of green cheese, and you can't prove it isn't.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell  Popcorn

Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist 
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(November 11, 2018 at 6:16 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote:
(November 11, 2018 at 6:13 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: No, the article clearly states that it may be different, not that it is.

No it doesn't. 
"Fast radio bursts were first discovered in 2007, and scientists have been trying to ascertain their origin and cause ever since.

There are currently 18 known FRBs, but they were all detected by non-specialist radio telescopes that were unable to narrow down their origin to a precise location, according to researchers at McGill University."

Scientists discover all kinds of things they never detected before. It's a RADIO(range) signal. 
That's hardly anything new. You know what a radio is ? 

Wow. Just wow. 
Did you take high shcool science ?

Wow, just wow- here is the last sentence of the article "We do have to keep in mind that this FRB is the only one known to repeat, so it may be physically different from the others," he said in a statement.   

So two differences, one known and one not yet known- It is the only one known to repeat (that is the first known difference) and it may be physically different (that is the possible second difference.) 
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(November 11, 2018 at 6:23 pm)Everena Wrote: Wow, just wow- here is the last sentence of the article "We do have to keep in mind that this FRB is the only one known to repeat, so it may be physically different from the others," he said in a statement.   

So two differences, one known and one not yet known- It is the only one known to repeat is the first difference and it may be physically different is the possible second difference. 

May be different.

Yet again, theists proving they lack reading comprehension skills.
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(November 11, 2018 at 6:23 pm)Everena Wrote:
(November 11, 2018 at 6:16 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote: No it doesn't. 
"Fast radio bursts were first discovered in 2007, and scientists have been trying to ascertain their origin and cause ever since.

There are currently 18 known FRBs, but they were all detected by non-specialist radio telescopes that were unable to narrow down their origin to a precise location, according to researchers at McGill University."

Scientists discover all kinds of things they never detected before. It's a RADIO(range) signal. 
That's hardly anything new. You know what a radio is ? 

Wow. Just wow. 
Did you take high shcool science ?

Wow, just wow- here is the last sentence of the article "We do have to keep in mind that this FRB is the only one known to repeat, so it may be physically different from the others," he said in a statement.   

So two differences, one known and one not yet known- It is the only one known to repeat (that is the first known difference) and it may be physically different (that is the possible second difference.) 

Facepalm I see the problem here. You're a fucking moron. Explains everything.
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Spontaneous assembly of DNA from precursor molecules prior to life. Anomalocaris 4 1201 April 4, 2019 at 6:12 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Music and DNA tahaadi 4 1594 September 29, 2018 at 4:35 am
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  Dr. Long proves life after death or no? Manga 27 8229 April 27, 2017 at 4:59 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  "DNA Labelling!" aka American Idiots Davka 28 8519 February 4, 2015 at 1:45 am
Last Post: Aractus
  A new atheist's theories on meta-like physical existence freedeepthink 14 4305 October 1, 2014 at 1:35 am
Last Post: freedeepthink
  Do the multiverse theories prove the existence of... Mudhammam 3 2366 January 12, 2014 at 12:03 pm
Last Post: Esquilax
  Yeti DNA sequenced Doubting Thomas 2 1565 October 17, 2013 at 7:17 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Science Proves God Pahu 3 2145 August 2, 2012 at 4:54 pm
Last Post: Jackalope
  New Human DNA Strain Detected Minimalist 10 5395 July 27, 2012 at 7:24 pm
Last Post: popeyespappy
  Junk DNA and creationism little_monkey 0 2085 December 3, 2011 at 9:23 am
Last Post: little_monkey



Users browsing this thread: 30 Guest(s)