DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Bucky Ball]

You can’t claim most of the world as “we” when the vast majority of god believers disagree with you and likely think you’re going to end up in some sort of hell.

We are already in that sort of hell.

Isn't that special. 
You're dismissed. 

We have a policy here (we're on the "nut-a-week" plan) ... one troll at a time. 
We're booked for this week. We need to to make room for the new troll. 
Buh-bye.

[Silver]

Theists unreasonably believe that if they repeat untruths to themselves enough that those mantras become truths in their minds. In that one respect they are correct, in how they are deluding themselves, yet reality remains as it is despite their false comforts.

[sdelsolray]

I note that poster Everena earlier wrote she was raised by atheists (not as an atheist, by "by atheists"), as if it was some tribulation.

Given poster's Everene's sanctimony, near-narcissism, willful ignorance in science and other subjects, attraction to metaphysical and quantum woo woo, and general hate and disdain for atheism, I am really more interested in how she became so psychologically and emotionally damaged. Was it her atheist parents? A need for attention?

Her mere assertions and screeds are dime a dozen PRATTs, are expected and are quite empty and boring (except the quantum biology nonsense - that is truly some funny stuff).

I wonder how she would have turned out if she spent time with a quality secular mental health professional before she became so disturbed.

[Everena]

But she can't quote the paragraph from the article that says what she claims .... LMAO

We are most of the world.

http://www.pewforum.org/2009/11/05/scien...nd-belief/

"We" are not as "we" as she thinks.
LOL
This one can't even define what it is she believes in. 

More "ad populum" fallacy.

That article is just about scientists and also it is  just about the United States. And we believers comprise  93% of the world according to the best estimates. See for yourself. 73 cited scholarly cited sources.   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_atheism

[LadyForCamus]

So many distractions from you.

My experience with god is real.  I know it.  I don’t have to prove it to you.  You are the one who is deciding there is an afterlife on your own.  I have experiences with the one true god, and I know that there is no afterlife, because he did not design us that way.  The same method, personal experience, leads two people to two different conclusions.  Mutually exclusive conclusions.  What does that tell you about the reliability of personal experience?

That you are making something up in an attempt to get attention. We KNOW God exists and that there is an afterlife, and some day you will too and you will realize how silly you sound to those of us who know these things beyond any and all doubt.

Troll it is, then.

[Bucky Ball]

But she can't quote the paragraph from the article that says what she claims .... LMAO


http://www.pewforum.org/2009/11/05/scien...nd-belief/

"We" are not as "we" as she thinks.
LOL
This one can't even define what it is she believes in. 

More "ad populum" fallacy.

That article is just about scientists and also it is  just about the United States. And we believers comprise  93% of the world according to the best estimates. See for yourself. 73 cited scholarly cited sources.   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_atheism

Actually it's about all kinds of people. Your reading is seriously impaired. 
No amount of your "ad populum" fallacy will convince anyone. 
There is not a shred of evidence that they all buy into the SAME gods. 
YOU yourself can't even tell us what god you worship.

[Everena]

I note that poster Everena earlier wrote she was raised by atheists (not as an atheist, by "by atheists"), as if it was some tribulation.

Given poster's Everene's sanctimony, near-narcissism, willful ignorance in science and other subjects, attraction to metaphysical and quantum woo woo, and general hate and disdain for atheism, I am really more interested in how she became so psychologically and emotionally damaged.  Was it her atheist parents?  A need for attention?

Her mere assertions and screeds are dime a dozen PRATTs, are expected and are quite empty and boring (except the quantum biology nonsense - that is truly some funny stuff).

I wonder how she would have turned out if she spent time with a quality secular mental health professional before she became so disturbed.

Please explain how I have been "willfully ignorant in science and other subjects." I have so far only seen atheists on this thread being ignorant about science, so please be very specific. I do not hate atheism. I think it's a misguided delusion that you have all created for yourselves, but I do not hate it.

[Bucky Ball]

I note that poster Everena earlier wrote she was raised by atheists (not as an atheist, by "by atheists"), as if it was some tribulation.

Given poster's Everene's sanctimony, near-narcissism, willful ignorance in science and other subjects, attraction to metaphysical and quantum woo woo, and general hate and disdain for atheism, I am really more interested in how she became so psychologically and emotionally damaged.  Was it her atheist parents?  A need for attention?

Her mere assertions and screeds are dime a dozen PRATTs, are expected and are quite empty and boring (except the quantum biology nonsense - that is truly some funny stuff).

I wonder how she would have turned out if she spent time with a quality secular mental health professional before she became so disturbed.

Please explain how I have been "willfully ignorant in science and other subjects." I have so far only seen atheists on this thread being ignorant about science, so please be very specific. I do not hate atheism. I think it's a misguided delusion that you have all created for yourselves, but I do not hate it.

You claimed an article said something it didn't.

[Everena]

That you are making something up in an attempt to get attention. We KNOW God exists and that there is an afterlife, and some day you will too and you will realize how silly you sound to those of us who know these things beyond any and all doubt.

Troll it is, then.

Oh yes, and anyone who makes really good logical points, or doesn't agree with your misguided notions about what science can and can't prove is immediately called a troll. How dare they be so much smarter than you are?

[Whateverist]

But she can't quote the paragraph from the article that says what she claims .... LMAO


http://www.pewforum.org/2009/11/05/scien...nd-belief/

"We" are not as "we" as she thinks.
LOL
This one can't even define what it is she believes in. 

More "ad populum" fallacy.

That article is just about scientists and also it is  just about the United States. And we believers comprise  93% of the world according to the best estimates. See for yourself. 73 cited scholarly cited sources.   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_atheism

Huh, imagine that.  Where I live about a third of the population reports as being religious.  I guess my city might be an anomaly.  Pretty lucky to live where so many people have seen the light.