Posts: 2755
Threads: 8
Joined: November 28, 2014
Reputation:
22
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
January 21, 2019 at 11:34 am
(This post was last modified: January 21, 2019 at 11:35 am by Peebothuhlu.)
(January 21, 2019 at 10:19 am)CDF47 Wrote: (January 20, 2019 at 9:53 pm)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: At work.
Well....... anything that might indicate an afferming test.
Or, failing that, something that's been put forward that might falsify said hypothesis/theory?
The test was when the functionality of DNA was discovered in 1957. What?
I'm sorry, could you try using a different tack on you explanation?
That people were investigating the 'Chemistry' of the DNA goes back a lot further than Watson and Crik (sp?) working out the shape of the thing.
Also... what would/might falsify I.D.?
Not at work.
Posts: 13901
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
January 21, 2019 at 2:24 pm
How did the designer do the designing?
what was its process and how did it implement the design.
If things are "designed" why the inefficient use of so many sperm, most of which die.
Why does it appear as though things evolved both in the fossil and DNA record.
Why does all the science not support the idea that things are designed?
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 1585
Threads: 8
Joined: November 27, 2018
Reputation:
6
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
January 21, 2019 at 2:33 pm
(This post was last modified: January 21, 2019 at 2:36 pm by T0 Th3 M4X.)
(January 21, 2019 at 7:51 am)Gae Bolga Wrote: We don't have moronic disagreements, because I wouldn't marry a moron. See, I got to choose my wife, I don't get to choose what morons join af, huh?
Who said you were the one who married the moron? 
I'm sure she's a fantastic person Charlie Brown. But you on the other hand...
I'm actually really surprised you brought your wife into a discussion like this. So just going to try to tiptoe around her as the subject. And on that note, just going to leave this alone for now.
(January 21, 2019 at 2:24 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: How did the designer do the designing?
what was its process and how did it implement the design.
If things are "designed" why the inefficient use of so many sperm, most of which die.
Why does it appear as though things evolved both in the fossil and DNA record.
Why does all the science not support the idea that things are designed?
"All the science does not support" is a false premise. If the question asserts something that is illogical, then you can't expect a logical response to answer the question as intended. On the basis that what you're claiming to be new "science", then the burden would be on you to prove your claims.
Posts: 2278
Threads: 9
Joined: October 3, 2013
Reputation:
25
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
January 21, 2019 at 2:59 pm
(This post was last modified: January 21, 2019 at 3:00 pm by Bucky Ball.)
(January 21, 2019 at 2:33 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: "All the science does not support" is a false premise"
is an unsupported claim.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell 
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist
Posts: 2741
Threads: 2
Joined: May 4, 2018
Reputation:
3
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
January 21, 2019 at 3:10 pm
(This post was last modified: January 21, 2019 at 3:12 pm by CDF47.)
(January 21, 2019 at 11:34 am)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: (January 21, 2019 at 10:19 am)CDF47 Wrote: The test was when the functionality of DNA was discovered in 1957. What?
I'm sorry, could you try using a different tack on you explanation?
That people were investigating the 'Chemistry' of the DNA goes back a lot further than Watson and Crik (sp?) working out the shape of the thing.
Also... what would/might falsify I.D.?
Not at work.
Nothing could falsify the information found in DNA.
(January 21, 2019 at 2:24 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: How did the designer do the designing?
what was its process and how did it implement the design.
If things are "designed" why the inefficient use of so many sperm, most of which die.
Why does it appear as though things evolved both in the fossil and DNA record.
Why does all the science not support the idea that things are designed?
Evolution to an extent is part of the implementation of the design as I have stated. There are natural processes used by the Designer.
(January 21, 2019 at 2:33 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: (January 21, 2019 at 7:51 am)Gae Bolga Wrote: We don't have moronic disagreements, because I wouldn't marry a moron. See, I got to choose my wife, I don't get to choose what morons join af, huh?
Who said you were the one who married the moron?
I'm sure she's a fantastic person Charlie Brown. But you on the other hand...
I'm actually really surprised you brought your wife into a discussion like this. So just going to try to tiptoe around her as the subject. And on that note, just going to leave this alone for now.
(January 21, 2019 at 2:24 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: How did the designer do the designing?
what was its process and how did it implement the design.
If things are "designed" why the inefficient use of so many sperm, most of which die.
Why does it appear as though things evolved both in the fossil and DNA record.
Why does all the science not support the idea that things are designed?
"All the science does not support" is a false premise. If the question asserts something that is illogical, then you can't expect a logical response to answer the question as intended. On the basis that what you're claiming to be new "science", then the burden would be on you to prove your claims.
Agreed.
Posts: 2755
Threads: 8
Joined: November 28, 2014
Reputation:
22
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
January 21, 2019 at 3:13 pm
At work.
Tsk, tsk M4X. Selectivly quoting some one?
Well.... since your post asked Downbeatplumb about 'Defending their position' how about 150 odd years of research?
Care to offer something for your position, M4X?
Posts: 2278
Threads: 9
Joined: October 3, 2013
Reputation:
25
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
January 21, 2019 at 3:16 pm
(This post was last modified: January 21, 2019 at 3:21 pm by Bucky Ball.)
Quote:Evolution to an extent is part of the implementation of the design as I have stated. There are natural processes used by the Designer.
Yes indeed. It was really great design that gave elephants an immune system 20 times stronger than humans,
and a design that gives cancer to infants and babies. Yay God.
It was also really great design that made it so that the solar system was vulnerable to the 5 great mass extinction events :
•End Ordovician, 444 million years ago, 85% of species lost
•Late Devonian, 375 million years ago, 75% of species lost. ...
•End Permian, 251 million years ago, 96% of species lost. ...
•End Triassic, 200 million years ago, 80% of species lost. ...
•End Cretaceous, 66 million years ago, 76% of all species lost
thus demonstrating all these creatures were made for no purpose, other than to wipe them out.
Real smart design there. LOL
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist
Posts: 2755
Threads: 8
Joined: November 28, 2014
Reputation:
22
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
January 21, 2019 at 3:21 pm
At work.
So, just to clarify CDF47?
Your position is that:
"Nothing could/can falsify I.D." ?
Posts: 1585
Threads: 8
Joined: November 27, 2018
Reputation:
6
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
January 21, 2019 at 3:30 pm
(January 21, 2019 at 2:59 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote: (January 21, 2019 at 2:33 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: "All the science does not support" is a false premise"
is an unsupported claim.
All knowledge is science.
Posts: 2755
Threads: 8
Joined: November 28, 2014
Reputation:
22
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
January 21, 2019 at 3:43 pm
(January 21, 2019 at 3:30 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: All knowledge is science.
Really M4X?
What about the skills and ability to sculp? To produce statuary?
What about painted art in all its genres?
What about music in all its form?
Motion pictures, plays, operas?
Trully, is there 'Science' required for the knowledge in such things?
|
