DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Pat Mustard]

That's easy, if it's brain-killingly stupid CDF47 said it.  If it at least approximates to reality then somebody else said it.

Why not try debate rather than insult?

Because all you know and understand is insults, Liar. I tried debating with you earlier on in the thread, you refused to listen and instead of refuting my arguments or accepting them, you dismissed them out of hand because they both didn't agree with your position and were unarguable against by you.

So now I'm only on this thread to give you the shitkicking you so richly deserve.

[Abaddon_ire]

What? You want to count citing the wingnuts Behe and Myer? That just made you look even dumber.

I went from being a liar to someone who quotes sources you don't like.  Who is the one lying here.  It's not me.

I neither like nor dislike them. They are simply stupidly wrong. That is another lie from you.

How about your claim that DNA was like machine code. Care to demonstrate an "if, then" loop in this imaginary DNA machine code? How about a "for, next" loop? How about a "stack"? How about a simple INC or DEC mnemonic? For the laugh, have a go at multi-threading. That has to be worth a giggle.

No? Oh dear. Another of your lies. You have no clue what machine code is or does and your favourite goto authors don't either. They simply lie to you and depend on you to brainlessly repeat their lies. And that makes them your lies.

[CDF47]

Dr. Meyer alone has a PhD from Cambridge.  He is no dummy.  Watch his videos.  He is highly intelligent and it is obvious.  He is a credible source too by the way.  I never caught him lying in any of the articles I read or videos I watched.

A learned man can still fall prey to the delusion of religion, unfortunately.

He is more than just some learned man.  He knows science very well.  I recommend you listen to some of his debates and interviews and read some of his writings.

---

Dr. Meyer alone has a PhD from Cambridge.  He is no dummy.  Watch his videos.  He is highly intelligent and it is obvious.  He is a credible source too by the way.  I never caught him lying in any of the articles I read or videos I watched.

He has a PHD in history and philosophy.

Biography

Meyer graduated with B.S. degrees in physics and earth science in 1981 from the Christian Whitworth College[5] and worked as a geophysicist for the Atlantic Richfield Company.[6] Shortly after, Meyer won a scholarship from the Rotary Club of Dallas to study at Cambridge University where he earned his Ph.D. in history and philosophy of science in 1991.[7] His dissertation was entitled "Of clues and causes: A methodological interpretation of origin of life studies."[7] After gaining his Ph.D., Meyer taught philosophy at Whitworth,[8] then at the Christian Palm Beach Atlantic University.[7] Meyer later ceased teaching to devote his time to the intelligent design movement.[9]

Wikipedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_C._Meyer

---

Why not try debate rather than insult?

Because all you know and understand is insults, Liar.  I tried debating with you earlier on in the thread, you refused to listen and instead of refuting my arguments or accepting them, you dismissed them out of hand because they both didn't agree with your position and were unarguable against by you.

So now I'm only on this thread to give you the shitkicking you so richly deserve.

A verbal insult Internet warrior.  I'm impressed, LOL.

---

I went from being a liar to someone who quotes sources you don't like.  Who is the one lying here.  It's not me.

I neither like nor dislike them. They are simply stupidly wrong. That is another lie from you.

How about your claim that DNA was like machine code. Care to demonstrate an "if, then" loop in this imaginary DNA machine code? How about a "for, next" loop? How about a "stack"?  How about a simple INC or DEC mnemonic? For the laugh, have a go at multi-threading. That has to be worth a giggle.

No? Oh dear. Another of your lies. You have no clue what machine code is or does and your favourite goto authors don't either. They simply lie to you and depend on you to brainlessly repeat their lies. And that makes them your lies.

This is what I meant:

What does DNA do?
DNA contains the instructions needed for an organism to develop, survive and reproduce. To carry out these functions, DNA sequences must be converted into messages that can be used to produce proteins, which are the complex molecules that do most of the work in our bodies.

Each DNA sequence that contains instructions to make a protein is known as a gene. The size of a gene may vary greatly, ranging from about 1,000 bases to 1 million bases in humans. Genes only make up about 1 percent of the DNA sequence. DNA sequences outside this 1 percent are involved in regulating when, how and how much of a protein is made.

How are DNA sequences used to make proteins?
DNA's instructions are used to make proteins in a two-step process. First, enzymes read the information in a DNA molecule and transcribe it into an intermediary molecule called messenger ribonucleic acid, or mRNA.

Next, the information contained in the mRNA molecule is translated into the "language" of amino acids, which are the building blocks of proteins. This language tells the cell's protein-making machinery the precise order in which to link the amino acids to produce a specific protein. This is a major task because there are 20 types of amino acids, which can be placed in many different orders to form a wide variety of proteins.

https://www.genome.gov/25520880/deoxyrib...act-sheet/

[Amarok]

It's not a matter of realizing anything. I was clear in what I said.  Sure I may have some posts that aren't perfectly written when responding to an army of people quickly but for the most part I think my point is clear.

Nope to all . You comments are a muddled mess .

[CDF47]

It's not a matter of realizing anything. I was clear in what I said.  Sure I may have some posts that aren't perfectly written when responding to an army of people quickly but for the most part I think my point is clear.

Nope to all . You comments are a muddled mess .

Not quite.

[Amarok]

Nope to all . You comments are a muddled mess .

Not quite.

I'm afraid you are very wrong

[LadyForCamus]

[Abaddon_ire]

I neither like nor dislike them. They are simply stupidly wrong. That is another lie from you.

How about your claim that DNA was like machine code. Care to demonstrate an "if, then" loop in this imaginary DNA machine code? How about a "for, next" loop? How about a "stack"?  How about a simple INC or DEC mnemonic? For the laugh, have a go at multi-threading. That has to be worth a giggle.

No? Oh dear. Another of your lies. You have no clue what machine code is or does and your favourite goto authors don't either. They simply lie to you and depend on you to brainlessly repeat their lies. And that makes them your lies.

This is what I meant:

<snip dumb analogy provided for the hard of thinking>

You do realise that all that rubbish is a fucking analogy provided for the hard of thinking, right?

You do realise that taking an analogy to stupid lengths is an actual thing, right?

You posting a child's analogy like that merely confirms that you understand none of it.

[Bucky Ball]

CDF,
How does the genetic mutation that causes Huntington's Disease prove Jebus ?

[CDF47]

Not quite.

I'm afraid you are very wrong

I don't think so.

---

Why the insult?  Is that all you guys do on here is insult creationists?  Why not just argue the facts?

---

This is what I meant:

<snip dumb analogy provided for the hard of thinking>

You do realise that all that rubbish is a fucking analogy provided for the hard of thinking, right?

You do realise that taking an analogy to stupid lengths is an actual thing, right?

You posting a child's analogy like that merely confirms that you understand none of it.

I provided a clear and concise explanation.  I knew you would like it.

---

CDF,
How does the genetic mutation that causes Huntington's Disease prove Jebus ?

Dying is part of this fallen world.  Disease is one way in which we die.  It is the intent of the design.