Are other races more evolved than Blacks?

[Minimalist]

The most athletic ability is only an opinion. However you claimed more black athletes possess superior athletic ability. 

You had two pictures of women and claimed genetics, clearly indicating that one was superior. 

You indicated that whites are injecting melanin. What did you mean with that statement if not racist?

Albinism occurs across races, you had no point. 

I've never stated that any race is less evolved.

The evidence suggests he has a point.

http://www.nba.com/teams/warriors

I'm mean, sure.  They have one token white guy on the roster.

[brewer]

The most athletic ability is only an opinion. However you claimed more black athletes possess superior athletic ability. 

You had two pictures of women and claimed genetics, clearly indicating that one was superior. 

You indicated that whites are injecting melanin. What did you mean with that statement if not racist?

Albinism occurs across races, you had no point. 

I've never stated that any race is less evolved.

The evidence suggests he has a point.

http://www.nba.com/teams/warriors

I'm mean, sure.  They have one token white guy on the roster.

When it comes to basket ball I agree. I just question his selection of the 2 sports to make a point which has little to nothing to do with evolved.

[Huggy Bear]

That's not the same thing.

You said I stated that back athletes were superior, provide the quote, or retract your statement.

Nope. 

Tell me what you really meant.

Nothing other than blacks are highly represented in the NFL and NBA.

Does that fact hurt your feelings?

Would you like me to provide the sources for the previous stats?

I'd like to point out that there is only one liar in this whole exchange and it ain't me...

---

The evidence suggests he has a point.

http://www.nba.com/teams/warriors

I'm mean, sure.  They have one token white guy on the roster.

When it comes to basket ball I agree. I just question his selection of the 2 sports to make a point which has little to nothing to do with evolved.

I clearly explained why I chose those sports, they require the most athleticism.

I asked you to provide a sport that requires just as much/more athleticism to prove I'm being biased, so far you've done nothing but whine.

[brewer]

Nope. 

Tell me what you really meant.

Nothing other than blacks are highly represented in the NFL and NBA.

Does that fact hurt your feelings?

Would you like me to provide the sources for the previous stats?

I'd like to point out that there is only one liar in this whole exchange and it ain't me...

---

When it comes to basket ball I agree. I just question his selection of the 2 sports to make a point which has little to nothing to do with evolved.

I clearly explained why I chose those sports, they require the most athleticism.

I asked you to provide a sport that requires just as much/more athleticism to prove I'm being biased, so far you've done nothing but whine.

Feelings not hurt. Just interesting that you picked those two sports and athleticism that have little to do with evolving.

Your biased because you picked "highly representative" sports and athleticism to try to make a point about evolving. 

"most athleticism" is subjective: 

http://www.espn.com/espn/page2/sportSkills
http://www.businessinsider.com/olympic-d...ort-2016-5

[Huggy Bear]

Nothing other than blacks are highly represented in the NFL and NBA.

Does that fact hurt your feelings?

Would you like me to provide the sources for the previous stats?

I'd like to point out that there is only one liar in this whole exchange and it ain't me...

---

I clearly explained why I chose those sports, they require the most athleticism.

I asked you to provide a sport that requires just as much/more athleticism to prove I'm being biased, so far you've done nothing but whine.

Feelings not hurt. Just interesting that you picked those two sports and athleticism that have little to do with evolving.

Your biased because you picked "highly representative" sports and athleticism to try to make a point about evolving. 

"most athleticism" is subjective: 

http://www.espn.com/espn/page2/sportSkills
http://www.businessinsider.com/olympic-d...ort-2016-5

 

Your first link makes no mention of what level of sport they are speaking of, in football the competition is completely different between the collegiate and professional levels. I expressly stated professional sports.

But even going by your list, the top spot is Boxing which still proves my point, need I list all the heavyweight champs?

The second in that list is Hockey, which black people aren't even interested in playing, which makes your point pretty much moot. Football and basketball however is popular among both black AND whites.

You kinda shot yourself in the foot with that one.

[brewer]

 

Your first link makes no mention of what level of sport they are speaking of, in football the competition is completely different between the collegiate and professional levels. I expressly stated professional sports.

But even going by your list, the top spot is Boxing which still proves my point, need I list all the heavyweight champs?

The second in that list is Hockey, which black people aren't even interested in playing, which makes your point pretty much moot. Football and basketball however is popular among both black AND whites.

You kinda shot yourself in the foot with that one.

You'll just never get it. But that's OK.

[Clueless Morgan]

Except that there's more genetic diversity among dark-skinned Africans than there is among lighter-skinned people.  So while it's true to say that we differ in skin color, it could also be argued, per the logic of the OP, that dark-skinned Africans are more evolved because they have more genetic diversity overall.

But genetic diversity doesn't mean more change it just means more numerous different types of change.  They're all different to one another but haven't necessarily changed more than non Africans have relative to an original ancestor.

If you were to look at dogs and wanted to find out which one changed the most since evolving from wolves you'd measure that based on which is the most different from the wolf rather than which comes from a more genetically diverse breed. 

Hypothetically if you have 100 different types of Husky dogs but only one type of pug dog it doesn't mean that the pug dog has changed less because the Husky dogs are more genetically diverse.

At least that's how I understand it.

I wasn't trying to make the point that more genetic diversity = more evolved, the point I was trying to make was that using the simplified logic of the OP (ancient ancestors were dark-skinned; current Africans are dark-skinned .:. light-skinned people are "more evolved") could just as easily lead one to conclude that modern-day Africans are "more evolved" due to their greater genetic diversity.

My opinion falls into the category of modern-day humans are all evolved to the same degree from our ancestors 200,000 years ago, and that amount of evolution is 200,000 years. It's not "more evolved" or "less evolved" or "better evolved" or "worse evolved," it's just evolved.

We have undergone evolutionary change due to the selection pressures we, as a species, have experienced over the last 200,000 years. That's it.

[Mr.Obvious]

It's a biology question for god's sake! My point was just that other races seem to have evolved/changed more than blacks relative to our common ancestors.

And I said shut the fuck up. Obvious racist is obvious.

HEY!

I take offence to that.

[Huggy Bear]

 

Your first link makes no mention of what level of sport they are speaking of, in football the competition is completely different between the collegiate and professional levels. I expressly stated professional sports.

But even going by your list, the top spot is Boxing which still proves my point, need I list all the heavyweight champs?

The second in that list is Hockey, which black people aren't even interested in playing, which makes your point pretty much moot. Football and basketball however is popular among both black AND whites.

You kinda shot yourself in the foot with that one.

You'll just never get it. But that's OK.

What I do get is that you have a post about black people having low IQ's (for which there is no evidence), and a post about black people being less evolved (again no evidence), Yet you find my post stating simple facts about race for which plenty of evidence exists, as the most racist post you've ever seen...

Using your logic, stating that men tend to be stronger than women must be sexist.

The simple fact of the matter is, you blatantly lied multiple times (I have more respect for an honest open white supremacist than a baldfaced liar), you never addressed the OP's post, which is odd seeing how apparently you're so concerned about racism.

The icing on the cake is the fact that three known open white supremacist on this forum are the ones kudosing your posts, it would seem you all have something in common...

[brewer]

You'll just never get it. But that's OK.

What I do get is that you have a post about black people having low IQ's (for which there is no evidence), and a post about black people being less evolved (again no evidence), Yet you find my post stating simple facts about race for which plenty of evidence exists, as the most racist post you've ever seen...

Using your logic, stating that men tend to be stronger than women must be sexist.

The simple fact of the matter is, you blatantly lied multiple times (I have more respect for an honest open white supremacist than a baldfaced liar), you never addressed the OP's post, which is odd seeing how apparently you're so concerned about racism.

The icing on the cake is the fact that three known open white supremacist on this forum are the ones kudosing your posts, it would seem you all have something in common...

I'm over it Huggy, you'll never get it. I'd try to tell you why but that's beating a dead horse.