Battle of Vukovar

[Minimalist]

Yeah... Apparently those.

[Rev. Rye]

[FlatAssembler]

I take it you haven't seen the Water Tower.

Yes, you can see it, but how do you know what you are looking at? Try to think about it without the help of the so-called experts. It could be a hologram, right? Or maybe a dragon's nest. How do you know that those holes on it were caused by bombs, and not by a dragon breathing fire in it?

[Mister Agenda]

We're not idiotic enough to suppose those less likely or impossible alternatives are more likely to be true than the more obvious explanation. Bayesian inference. Occam's Razor.

[Angrboda]

Troll. Or idiot. I'll go with either explanation.

[FlatAssembler]

We're not idiotic enough to suppose those less likely or impossible alternatives are more likely to be true than the more obvious explanation. Bayesian inference. Occam's Razor.

Why would bombs be a more obvious explanation than dragons? I've never seen a bomb, in fact, bombs, as far as I know, appear to contradict the Second Law of Thermodynamics. But I see flying animals every single day.

[The Grand Nudger]

I thought...for sure.....this thread was dead.  I see now, however, that someone has to explain to you why bombs are a more efficient explanation than dragons.

Cut the shit.  

Why is it important to you and yours that history never happened? Are you one of those fuckers on my cards that I never found?

[Mister Agenda]

We're not idiotic enough to suppose those less likely or impossible alternatives are more likely to be true than the more obvious explanation. Bayesian inference. Occam's Razor.

Why would bombs be a more obvious explanation than dragons? I've never seen a bomb, in fact, bombs, as far as I know, appear to contradict the Second Law of Thermodynamics. But I see flying animals every single day.

I'm not sure which is more pathetic: someone who is profoundly idiotic or someone who pretends to be profoundly idiotic.

[FlatAssembler]

[downbeatplumb]