Madeiline McCann coverup

[LastPoet]

That's the thing Rob. You can't find further evidence now, only conjecture. Unless she appears or is found or a body is found. Criminalisticly they should've hammered the iron whila was hot.

[robvalue]

For those who wonder why I’m wittering on to myself here, I find it cathartic. It helps me arrange my thoughts on the road to settling this case and expunging it from my mind.

I’ve been trying to think of any explanation for the fluids in the rental car other than Madeleine being present (dead or alive). The best I can do is them driving around with some of her possessions in the boot along with some liquid, and a leak occurs, causing some DNA to get into it when it dries. They haven’t offered this defence, but if they did they would be going against their earlier statement that they had nothing they could give the police containing her DNA for testing.

Since they just tried to play down the whole thing and offered nothing, I’m going with definite conspiracy.

[Shell B]

The kid could've peed her pants at some point during the trip and the parents had her stuff in the trunk. There's no reason to think they just tossed out her stuff after they found her missing, so yeah, it's plausible that her DNA was in the trunk, even if she wasn't.

I've mentioned that the videos weren't great and why. You intimated that they would be eye-opening, but I found them to be judgmental and spurious at best. Again, this is from someone who finds blame with the parents because of their negligence.

[Tiberius]

I’ve been trying to think of any explanation for the fluids in the rental car other than Madeleine being present (dead or alive).

It's a rental car. Who knows what else has been in it, whether someone bled in it at some point, someone put something bloody in there at some point, etc.

The "15 out of 19" DNA components found were not "unique to her" according to the British forensic scientist. That means that at best, the DNA can't be conclusively stated as hers. At worst (for you and your conspiracy), it could be someone else's DNA entirely.

If you honestly can't think of another explanation, then you are being entirely closed minded, which is typical of conspiracy theorists. You start at a conclusion and try and fit the facts to meet it, which is the opposite of how science and investigations in general work.

They haven’t offered this defence, but if they did they would be going against their earlier statement that they had nothing they could give the police containing her DNA for testing.

Since they just tried to play down the whole thing and offered nothing, I’m going with definite conspiracy.

This is hilarious. You don't trust the McCanns statements when they go against your conspiracy, but you trust them when they help it. Perhaps the McCanns didn't realize there was something that had her DNA on it in the back of the car? You ever think of that scenario, rather that assuming they are just lying to the police? No, of course not, because that would ruin your conspiracy and leave room for some doubt.

Of course, all of this is null and void because as I've shown, the DNA in the back of the car could not be conclusively identified as Maddie's.

[robvalue]

PS: The theory of the chief investigator is that they managed to get the use of a freezer at some point for temporary storage, so that the body wouldn’t give itself away. The patterns of the fluid stains in the car are consistent with that same tennis bag being in the boot containing her thawing body, and fluids seeping out of either end, during the final move to somewhere permanent.

They have several local connections with nearby people of low moral character, and still more people who would have been implicated by this point; so I think they could have easily arranged the use of a freezer.

Why did they do this in a hire car? A forensic countermeasure, and also so that their own vehicle wouldn’t be the one they used to dump their daughter's body.

[Shell B]

So, just talking to yourself and no one else then, huh? Well, watching that shit and responding was a waste of time.

[Deesse23]

He is talking to himself for quite a few pages now, if not for the entire thread.

Its baffling again to see a behaviour like this from someone who demonstrably was able to identify the same pattern on others presenting conspiracy theories about 9/11, constellations of starts or various christian nonsense, but seems to have absolutely no self-reflection about his own obsessions.

Just another demonstration how complex and full of contradictions and the human mind is.

[LastPoet]

This isn't a closed case. A child went missing. like so many. It touches me in the way that in Portugal, child abductions aren't common. Cold case, there isn't enough evidence to support a trial based thesis. Period.

[robvalue]

This is the report from the lab about the sample found in the car:

A complex LCN DNA result which appeared to have originated from at least three people was obtained from cellular material recovered from the luggage compartment section 286C 2007 CRL10 (2) area 2. Within the DNA profile of Madeline McCann there are 20 DNA components represented by 19 peaks on a chart. At one of the areas of DNA we routinely examine Madeleine has inherited the same DNA component from both parents; this appears therefore as 1 peak rather than 2, hence 19 rather than 20. Of these 19 components 15 are present within the result from this item; there are 37 components in total. There are 37 components because there are at least 3 contributors; but there could be up to five contributors. In my opinion therefore this result is too complex for meaningful interpretation/inclusion.

This is exactly what I was saying. Once you remove all the complete unnecessary bullshit from this "explanation", you end up with 15 out of 19 matches for Maddie. The rest of this is utter nonsense to confuse the reader. The conclusion is that it is a legal match. It makes no difference about the parents or other contributors. If 15 are matched up, then that’s enough in a British court of law. This is an erroneous conclusion from someone who has obviously been told to make it look like the McCanns are innocent. There are ways of eliminating the other people from the analysis.

https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JOHN_LOWE.htm

Go to 21:50 in this video for evidence.

[LastPoet]

Alright, are tyou mimmicking Mystic knight now?