Posts: 9915
Threads: 53
Joined: November 27, 2015
Reputation:
92
RE: Make Atheist Forums Great Again (Part 1)
December 11, 2018 at 4:09 pm
(December 11, 2018 at 3:57 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: (December 11, 2018 at 3:48 pm)Wololo Wrote: So, for example, would using "creatardism" to describe the "system" of thought be ok, and using "creatard" to describe a spouter of said thought (for a given value of thought, namely 0) be wrong?
PS What happened to the idea I had for free Snickers bars for logging on?
Try it this way: if you have agonize over whether a particular term is appropriate then you probably shouldn’t use it.
Boru
This. ^^^
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Posts: 2501
Threads: 158
Joined: April 19, 2013
Reputation:
19
RE: Make Atheist Forums Great Again (Part 1)
December 11, 2018 at 4:20 pm
Praise Trump. His is filled with holy spirit.
Posts: 46654
Threads: 543
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
108
RE: Make Atheist Forums Great Again (Part 1)
December 11, 2018 at 4:59 pm
(December 11, 2018 at 4:09 pm)Wololo Wrote: (December 11, 2018 at 4:01 pm)Tiberius Wrote: You really should be asking yourself why you need to describe creationism that way to begin with, though. It's enough to say "creationism is stupid" without using a slur.
I know exactly why I use the term, it's accurate.
Calling someone a leprotic koala-arsed buffoon who looks like his face lost an argument with an angry woodchipper might be accurate, but you still can’t use it in a thread title.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 30010
Threads: 116
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
158
RE: Make Atheist Forums Great Again (Part 1)
December 11, 2018 at 6:16 pm
(This post was last modified: December 11, 2018 at 6:19 pm by Angrboda.)
(December 11, 2018 at 1:57 pm)Tiberius Wrote: I don't think calling an idea / belief system "fucking stupid" is a slur, either though. Calling it "retarded" would be.
There's a difference? That seems to involve some mighty fine and politically correct judgement.
(December 11, 2018 at 3:57 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: (December 11, 2018 at 3:48 pm)Wololo Wrote: So, for example, would using "creatardism" to describe the "system" of thought be ok, and using "creatard" to describe a spouter of said thought (for a given value of thought, namely 0) be wrong?
PS What happened to the idea I had for free Snickers bars for logging on?
Try it this way: if you have agonize over whether a particular term is appropriate then you probably shouldn’t use it.
Boru
Rules exist for when they're broken, not for when they're observed.
Posts: 1176
Threads: 30
Joined: May 22, 2017
Reputation:
21
RE: Make Atheist Forums Great Again (Part 1)
December 11, 2018 at 6:19 pm
Soooo
We still on for getting Tibs a substandard Tan-crème and a bad wig for christmass, right?
"If we go down, we go down together!"
- Your mum, last night, suggesting 69.
-
Posts: 23918
Threads: 300
Joined: June 25, 2011
Reputation:
150
RE: Make Atheist Forums Great Again (Part 1)
December 11, 2018 at 6:25 pm
(December 11, 2018 at 1:57 pm)Tiberius Wrote: I don't think calling an idea / belief system "fucking stupid" is a slur, either though. Calling it "retarded" would be.
Probably already addressed but I assume thread titles such as "Why Xtianity is so stupid" or "the inanity of xtianity" would still be ruled out? (Sorry still catching up.)
Posts: 549
Threads: 3
Joined: May 28, 2017
Reputation:
42
RE: Make Atheist Forums Great Again (Part 1)
December 11, 2018 at 6:36 pm
(December 11, 2018 at 6:16 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: (December 11, 2018 at 1:57 pm)Tiberius Wrote: I don't think calling an idea / belief system "fucking stupid" is a slur, either though. Calling it "retarded" would be.
There's a difference? That seems to involve some mighty fine and politically correct judgement.
One way makes friends faster than the other way.
... I suppose it comes down to what types of friends you're looking to meet.
Posts: 46654
Threads: 543
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
108
RE: Make Atheist Forums Great Again (Part 1)
December 11, 2018 at 6:46 pm
Maybe getting into the mindset that we should word thread titles as if we were posting a reply in the Introductions thread would help. Yes? No?
Thread titles - at most - are a dozen words or so. Wording them politely doesn't seem to be much of a chore.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 549
Threads: 3
Joined: May 28, 2017
Reputation:
42
RE: Make Atheist Forums Great Again (Part 1)
December 11, 2018 at 6:54 pm
(December 11, 2018 at 6:46 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Maybe getting into the mindset that we should word thread titles as if we were posting a reply in the Introductions thread would help. Yes? No?
Thread titles - at most - are a dozen words or so. Wording them politely doesn't seem to be much of a chore.
Boru
People browse these forums and make a decision about signing up based on those thread titles. If you've got neon signs all over the place declaring "WE HATE YOU," then... well... fewer new friends.
Posts: 14932
Threads: 684
Joined: August 25, 2008
Reputation:
142
RE: Make Atheist Forums Great Again (Part 1)
December 11, 2018 at 7:02 pm
(December 11, 2018 at 6:16 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: There's a difference? That seems to involve some mighty fine and politically correct judgement.
Calling an idea "stupid" isn't the best way to critique something, but ultimately it's a relatively tame expression. Calling an idea "fucking stupid" is less desirable, but still, "fucking" just emphasizes the stupidity you are trying to convey.
Calling an idea "retarded" is literally using a slur for mentally disabled people. So yeah, there's a big difference.
(December 11, 2018 at 6:25 pm)Whateverist Wrote: Probably already addressed but I assume thread titles such as "Why Xtianity is so stupid" or "the inanity of xtianity" would still be ruled out? (Sorry still catching up.)
I would say both of those would be allowed. The emphasis of the rule is really on "slurs". "Stupid" and "Inane" are perfectly valid criticisms of ideas; of course they both should be expanded on. Saying "Why Christianity is so retarded" would be disallowed due to the use of the slur.
There are some words which are always slurs (e.g. retarded). There are some words which are slurs in context (e.g. retard). There are some words which are slurs when you purposefully apply them to people, but not when they are applied to ideas (e.g. stupid).
|