Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 3, 2025, 6:09 am
Atheist Forums › Community › Atheism v
Argumentum ad Ignorantium Fallacy

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Argumentum ad Ignorantium Fallacy
Sal Offline
Senior Member
****
Religious Views: atheist
Posts: 2692
Threads: 11
Joined: May 13, 2013
Reputation: 17
#21
RE: Argumentum ad Ignorantium Fallacy
January 28, 2019 at 3:56 pm
(January 28, 2019 at 3:10 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(January 28, 2019 at 1:28 pm)Sal Wrote: You can't prove a negative.

I get tired of reading this. Of COURSE you can prove a negative.

Boru

Only something with positive attributes is possible to be disproven, otherwise not.
Find
Reply
BrianSoddingBoru4 Offline
Power-Drunk Administrator
*******
Religious Views: Headology
Posts: 46755
Threads: 544
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation: 108
#22
RE: Argumentum ad Ignorantium Fallacy
January 28, 2019 at 5:11 pm
(January 28, 2019 at 3:56 pm)Sal Wrote:
(January 28, 2019 at 3:10 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: I get tired of reading this. Of COURSE you can prove a negative.

Boru

Only something with positive attributes is possible to be disproven, otherwise not.

Which is not the same as not being able to prove a negative.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Find
Reply
brewer Offline Donators
wife thinks I'm part of the furniture
*****
Religious Views: atheist
Posts: 28571
Threads: 526
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation: 89
#23
RE: Argumentum ad Ignorantium Fallacy
January 28, 2019 at 8:33 pm
I'm comfortable being an Ignorantium.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Find
Reply
LadyForCamus Offline
Retired Staff
*****
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 9915
Threads: 53
Joined: November 27, 2015
Reputation: 92
#24
RE: Argumentum ad Ignorantium Fallacy
January 28, 2019 at 9:53 pm
Yay. Agnostico is back. I am so happy. 😒
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
Find
Reply
The Valkyrie Offline
The last smile some will see...
*******
Religious Views: Time to end them
Posts: 35414
Threads: 205
Joined: August 13, 2012
Reputation: 145
#25
RE: Argumentum ad Ignorantium Fallacy
January 28, 2019 at 10:48 pm
(January 28, 2019 at 8:33 pm)wyzas Wrote: I'm comfortable being an Ignorantium.

You're an element?

Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:

"You did WHAT?  With WHO?  WHERE???"
Find
Reply
brewer Offline Donators
wife thinks I'm part of the furniture
*****
Religious Views: atheist
Posts: 28571
Threads: 526
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation: 89
#26
RE: Argumentum ad Ignorantium Fallacy
January 28, 2019 at 11:00 pm
(January 28, 2019 at 10:48 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote:
(January 28, 2019 at 8:33 pm)wyzas Wrote: I'm comfortable being an Ignorantium.

You're an element?

Yes, heating.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Find
Reply
The Valkyrie Offline
The last smile some will see...
*******
Religious Views: Time to end them
Posts: 35414
Threads: 205
Joined: August 13, 2012
Reputation: 145
#27
RE: Argumentum ad Ignorantium Fallacy
January 28, 2019 at 11:13 pm
(January 28, 2019 at 11:00 pm)wyzas Wrote:
(January 28, 2019 at 10:48 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: You're an element?

Yes, heating.

I knew you were twisted!

Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:

"You did WHAT?  With WHO?  WHERE???"
Find
Reply
Agnostico Offline
Banned
Religious Views: Agnostic with Christian values
Posts: 541
Threads: 18
Joined: December 9, 2018
Reputation: 0
#28
RE: Argumentum ad Ignorantium Fallacy
January 29, 2019 at 2:10 pm
(January 28, 2019 at 2:12 pm)Thoreauvian Wrote: We have many other arguments to support the positive claim that God doesn't exist.  Atheism doesn't rest on one argument alone, and each argument tackles a different aspect of the question.

Ok please put forward these arguments.
I know the theists arguments. Their not convincing.
The atheists main argument is not convincing either.
What else is there?
Find
Reply
The Grand Nudger Offline
Retired Staff
*****
Religious Views: Invasive
Posts: 67461
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation: 161
#29
RE: Argumentum ad Ignorantium Fallacy
January 29, 2019 at 2:16 pm (This post was last modified: January 29, 2019 at 2:19 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
An atheist doesn't need an argument, they're only indicating that they don't believe in something.  

When I tell the religious, for example, I'm certain that their gods don't exist...I'm referring to a very specific set of existential claims they make about that god.  Not my own historic status of belief.  I'm insisting that their gods are a product of psychology and culture, of ignorance and even simple mistranslation.  That they exist as characters in a theologically important work but not as beings exterior to that work.  

In short, it's not because I don't believe that gods exist that I'm certain that gods don't.  It's because I know what gods are and exist as that I'm incapable of changing that historic status of belief. Some people, most atheists here at least...might agree with me on that if the subject is the judeochristian god - but defer to some other more nebulous god concept. They're not sure, in effect, that every god would be like that god.

I otoh, insist that my understanding describes the entire category of gods and god belief, not a specific god in that set.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Find
Reply
bennyboy Offline
Senior Member
****
Religious Views: agnostic
Posts: 9147
Threads: 83
Joined: May 22, 2013
Reputation: 46
#30
RE: Argumentum ad Ignorantium Fallacy
January 29, 2019 at 2:26 pm
(January 29, 2019 at 2:10 pm)Agnostico Wrote:
(January 28, 2019 at 2:12 pm)Thoreauvian Wrote: We have many other arguments to support the positive claim that God doesn't exist.  Atheism doesn't rest on one argument alone, and each argument tackles a different aspect of the question.

Ok please put forward these arguments.
I know the theists arguments. Their not convincing.
The atheists main argument is not convincing either.
What else is there?

"Argument?"

How about-- "You are telling me something, and I don't believe you.  Please demonstrate its truth."

Do you really need to form a cogent argument against every BS fairy tale them someone wants to throw at you?
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Community › Atheism v
Argumentum ad Ignorantium Fallacy

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy? FlatAssembler 61 5457 June 20, 2023 at 5:59 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Theist fallacy A_Nony_Mouse 1 1305 March 31, 2013 at 5:44 am
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. Ephrium 60 32049 March 4, 2009 at 10:17 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)