Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 29, 2024, 10:13 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
If you could have a conversation with anyone..
#21
RE: If you could have a conversation with anyone..
(July 20, 2019 at 6:49 am)vulcanlogician Wrote: Is nature brutal though? Or are we mere mortals prejudiced against a natural world that contains intense pain and suffering?

Well, nature would not meet human standards for preventing animal cruelty, with so many predators eating other animals alive and with population growth controlled by starvation. We may ourselves run up against the indifference of nature to our well-being with climate change and its effects.

And what other moral standards besides human standards are there? Apparently none.

(July 20, 2019 at 6:49 am)vulcanlogician Wrote: I'd love to read Thoreau's late journals with you. I've always found it useful to bounce ideas of others when reading a deep work. You might even start a thread in the journal subforum (or better yet, philosophy subforum) so other interested members could read along and discuss Thoreau's points. Just an idea.

Unlike the philosophy in A Week and Walden, Thoreau's journal entries are largely about his day-to-day observations of nature.

Of course, there is always a lot to discuss about Thoreau's ideas from his books and at least some journal selections.

There's a journal subforum?

(July 20, 2019 at 6:49 am)vulcanlogician Wrote: WHAT DID YOU THINK OF THE POEM?

The poem was interesting. It started well but it did lose me at the end. "If these be vague words, then seek not to clear them." Thoreau expressed a similar sentiment in Walden, but I'm afraid much is unclear to mystics exactly because they assume what they shouldn't: "God works in mysterious ways" and all that.
Reply
#22
RE: If you could have a conversation with anyone..
I wouldn't mind a chat with Dolly Parton. I would look her straight in the eye and ask her about her biggest hits.
Reply
#23
RE: If you could have a conversation with anyone..
(July 20, 2019 at 7:17 am)The Valkyrie Wrote: Pontius Pilate :  “Don’t crucify Jesus.  Have a really big Roman sodomise him to death.  Trust me on this!!”

Don’t catholic priests already believe that is how Jesus died?
Reply
#24
RE: If you could have a conversation with anyone..
(July 20, 2019 at 7:53 am)Alan V Wrote: Well, nature would not meet human standards for preventing animal cruelty, with so many predators eating other animals alive and with population growth controlled by starvation.  We may ourselves run up against the indifference of nature to our well-being with climate change and its effects.

I'd rather have my flesh torn apart by a lion and eaten alive, as tremendously painful as that may be, than kept alive for years in a stall in which I couldn't even turn around, until I was (eventually) fat enough for slaughter. Humans have shitty standards for animal cruelty. There are worse fates than being torn apart by lions, freezing to death in the winter cold, or dying in a brutal fight with a rival antelope during mating season. And humans have invented them all.

These aren't nearly as cruel as what humans have devised for animals. Lifelong servitude pulling a plow, being hooked up to a milk machine, kept confined in a wire box so you can produce eggs. Fuck it. I'll take my chances with the lions. Humans are ghastly torturers. Nature is kind by comparison. Is nature omnibenevolent? No. But she's something pretty close to it when compared with human beings.

Quote:Unlike the philosophy in A Week and Walden, Thoreau's journal entries are largely about his day-to-day observations of nature.

Of course, there is always a lot to discuss about Thoreau's ideas from his books and at least some journal selections.

I've read some of Thoreau's journals. They are thought-provoking. And they are also aphoristic. Each sentence becomes a paragraph in your mind. Each paragraph a chapter. Each chapter an entire book. Each book of his is a set of encyclopedias worth of provoked thought. And it's not like he's Hegel. (Abstract to the point of opacity.) All of us can comprehend and appreciate what Thoreau writes. Even those of us who aren't philosophy nerds. That's why I think it would work.


Quote:There's a journal subforum?

Yeah. I think so. But the philosophy forum would work to. Your choice. It would be awesome to do, I think.
Reply
#25
RE: If you could have a conversation with anyone..
(July 20, 2019 at 9:58 am)vulcanlogician Wrote:
(July 20, 2019 at 7:53 am)Alan V Wrote: Well, nature would not meet human standards for preventing animal cruelty, with so many predators eating other animals alive and with population growth controlled by starvation.  We may ourselves run up against the indifference of nature to our well-being with climate change and its effects.

I'd rather have my flesh torn apart by a lion and eaten alive, as tremendously painful as that may be, than kept alive for years in a stall in which I couldn't even turn around, until I was (eventually) fat enough for slaughter. Humans have shitty standards for animal cruelty. There are worse fates than being torn apart by lions, freezing to death in the winter cold, or dying in a brutal fight with a rival antelope during mating season. And humans have invented them all.

These aren't nearly as cruel as what humans have devised for animals. Lifelong servitude pulling a plow, being hooked up to a milk machine, kept confined in a wire box so you can produce eggs. Fuck it. I'll take my chances with the lions. Humans are ghastly torturers. Nature is kind by comparison. Is nature omnibenevolent? No. But she's something pretty close to it when compared with human beings.

Quote:Unlike the philosophy in A Week and Walden, Thoreau's journal entries are largely about his day-to-day observations of nature.

Of course, there is always a lot to discuss about Thoreau's ideas from his books and at least some journal selections.

I've read some of Thoreau's journals. They are thought-provoking. And they are also aphoristic. Each sentence becomes a paragraph in your mind. Each paragraph a chapter. Each chapter an entire book. Each book of his is a set of encyclopedias worth of provoked thought. And it's not like he's Hegel. (Abstract to the point of opacity.) All of us can comprehend and appreciate what Thoreau writes. Even those of us who aren't philosophy nerds. That's why I think it would work.


Quote:There's a journal subforum?

Yeah. I think so. But the philosophy forum would work to. Your choice. It would be awesome to do, I think.

Humans are not part of nature?


Humans are not the fruit of nature’s unstinting and ongoing effort to formulate ever more sophisticated and ingenious mechanisms to affect ever crueler tortures upon, well, previous generations of less sophisticated and less ingenious torturers?
Reply
#26
RE: If you could have a conversation with anyone..
For me, a conversation with the Hitch.

(July 20, 2019 at 10:16 am)Anomalocaris Wrote:
(July 20, 2019 at 9:58 am)vulcanlogician Wrote: I'd rather have my flesh torn apart by a lion and eaten alive, as tremendously painful as that may be, than kept alive for years in a stall in which I couldn't even turn around, until I was (eventually) fat enough for slaughter. Humans have shitty standards for animal cruelty. There are worse fates than being torn apart by lions, freezing to death in the winter cold, or dying in a brutal fight with a rival antelope during mating season. And humans have invented them all.

These aren't nearly as cruel as what humans have devised for animals. Lifelong servitude pulling a plow, being hooked up to a milk machine, kept confined in a wire box so you can produce eggs. Fuck it. I'll take my chances with the lions. Humans are ghastly torturers. Nature is kind by comparison. Is nature omnibenevolent? No. But she's something pretty close to it when compared with human beings.


I've read some of Thoreau's journals. They are thought-provoking. And they are also aphoristic. Each sentence becomes a paragraph in your mind. Each paragraph a chapter. Each chapter an entire book. Each book of his is a set of encyclopedias worth of provoked thought. And it's not like he's Hegel. (Abstract to the point of opacity.) All of us can comprehend and appreciate what Thoreau writes. Even those of us who aren't philosophy nerds. That's why I think it would work.



Yeah. I think so. But the philosophy forum would work to. Your choice. It would be awesome to do, I think.

Humans are not part of nature?


Humans are not the fruit of nature’s unstinting and ongoing effort to formulate ever more sophisticated and ingenious mechanisms to affect ever crueler tortures upon, well, previous generations of less sophisticated and less ingenious torturers?
Reply
#27
RE: If you could have a conversation with anyone..
(July 20, 2019 at 11:08 am)Abaddon_ire Wrote: For me, a conversation with the Hitch.

Yes, good choice... I would ask him about his relationship with his brother Peter. You can choose your friends but you can't choose your family as they say.
Reply
#28
RE: If you could have a conversation with anyone..
Jimi Hendrix.
Where are you from, really?

Marilyn Monroe.
Can you show me how well you sing into the microphone?
Reply
#29
RE: If you could have a conversation with anyone..
Myself.

At 17 “Don’t do it!”

At 22 “Get a real job.”

At 30 “Perhaps you should have moved somewhere else.”

At 34 “Tell Jess you’re going away for the weekend.”
Dying to live, living to die.
Reply
#30
RE: If you could have a conversation with anyone..
Guy Ritchie:  'Why the hell don't you make films like you used to?  'Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels' - terrific!  'Snatch' - wonderful! 'RocknRolla' - brilliant!

'King Arthur:  Legend of the Sword' - dafuq were you thinking??'

Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Would you still cook if you diddn't have to? Angrboda 41 2025 October 30, 2023 at 3:40 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Have anyone seen this old video? purplepurpose 4 514 May 19, 2023 at 10:32 am
Last Post: purplepurpose
  Where would you go if you could? Brian37 24 1948 August 18, 2021 at 6:56 am
Last Post: Gwaithmir
  I could change my username again...... Foxaèr 29 1453 June 7, 2020 at 8:23 am
Last Post: Foxaèr
  Anyone else have that "weird" friend? Atomic Lava 31 2516 November 28, 2019 at 2:49 pm
Last Post: Rev. Rye
  "Top 10 Shows That Could Be The Next Game of Thrones." Gawdzilla Sama 11 909 May 21, 2019 at 10:00 pm
Last Post: ignoramus
  If you could Cod 20 2172 December 25, 2018 at 1:13 pm
Last Post: GUBU
  If you could live in a fairy tale Foxaèr 35 5858 November 11, 2018 at 7:37 am
Last Post: Gwaithmir
  If you could look like any celebrity The Industrial Atheist 30 4730 April 23, 2018 at 1:55 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  We could be villains The Valkyrie 31 2989 April 19, 2018 at 5:39 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)