the nature of sin

[Drich]

the only people susceptible to suffering are those indoctrinated to the point where they need to quote others to validate their own thoughts.

And your evidence for this outrageous statement is.........????

look at the type of douche who quotes others. so educated so in tune with modern philosophies his thoughts have become their thoughts. Don't tell me this is the first time you heard this?

[Gwaithmir]

And your evidence for this outrageous statement is.........????

look at the type of douche who quotes others. so educated so in tune with modern philosophies his thoughts have become their thoughts. Don't tell me this is the first time you heard this?

Nevertheless, the quote made a valid point which you are evading. Look at the type of douche who does a tap dance in order to avoid the burden of proof. You need look no farther than your own reflection in a mirror.

[Drich]

look at the type of douche who quotes others. so educated so in tune with modern philosophies his thoughts have become their thoughts. Don't tell me this is the first time you heard this?

Nevertheless, the quote made a valid point which you are evading. Look at the type of douche who does a tap dance in order to avoid the burden of proof. You need look no farther than your own reflection in a mirror.

the greater point i observed. Quote=group think. what else do you need to know?

[The Grand Nudger]

Why don't you just accept the boards appraisal of you as an occupational hazard? You don't have to agree that you're a mouth breathing retard, but you do have to incorporate that into your sales pitch if you hope to be effective.

[Gwaithmir]

Nevertheless, the quote made a valid point which you are evading. Look at the type of douche who does a tap dance in order to avoid the burden of proof. You need look no farther than your own reflection in a mirror.

the greater point i observed. Quote=group think. what else do you need to know?

And every time you quote the Bible, you're doing the same thing. Hypocrite!

[Xaventis]

[url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PiYJ5Io59gU&t=1s][/url]This takes the understand of sin to a easier level to comprehend. As it does not deal with the moral aspect of sin. As originally the law had three aspects and morality was only one aspect in which one sinned there was social and also ceremonial sin. The purpose of this is to show God is not judging only from a morality perspective which is all pop culture seems to be concerned. There are other aspects of sin

You implied that you have the “correct” understanding of sin and most Christians have a wrong one.
This is something you have to prove.


Because the bible is nonsense and every Christian sect has it’s own interpretation of multiple subjects.


So can you point me to the bible chapter that explain sin in detail? No? See the problem?
You desperately jump all over the place taking passages with no context and combining them together.


Prove that god is fake:
He did not explain anything in the bible, the bible has no answers to anything especially theology it simply assumes some things and never explains anything.
In the end the bible is only a collection of extremely stupid mythological myths no explanation of anything, not of angels, not of demons these characters are simply asserted like the reader is supposed to know what these things are.


If the bible was gods instruction book it have chapters like this


The trinity explained!
Hell what is it and who gets there.
What are you actually supposed to do to get to heaven.
Sin explained in detail.


Instead we get stupid stories that allude to these concepts and the rest of the Christian heresy fights are the result.


For example this is the REAL explanation of leviathan.

Moderator Notice
Link removed due to 30/30 violation. Please familiarize yourself with the rules.

[no one]

If you want to get to drick's level of intelligence, first you need to eat 4,589 gallons of lead based paint.

[The Grand Nudger]

Nah, the judicious application of christianity is up to the task.