Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 28, 2024, 1:27 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Applicability of Maths to the Universe
#71
RE: Applicability of Maths to the Universe
If we're speaking of intuition, a person might wonder why platonists allowed intuitions based on mental and physical objects to inform them both that there were platonic abstracts, and what they might be like. Still, given room to alter it's semantics, as room has been given to other metaphysical notions like materialism, it's conceivable that it might better describe some observed x in reality. It's simply becoming difficult to envision what that x might be as we learn more, as our ability to observe grows, and...ofc, as the semantics for other positions which make antithetical claims box it out.

Gods, minds, and numbers was a poor choice of field, in retrospect. Gods because they don't exist. Minds because they're meat. Numbers because..well...fuckin numbers, I'll leave that to you.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#72
RE: Applicability of Maths to the Universe
polymath, can you tell me if there is any issue with this answer?

Quote:Why is this number equal to 3.14159....? Why is it not some other (ir)rational number?

Answer is that with the usual Euclidean metric that is the number that one gets, the value of π is dependent on the geometry that is being used, so on a sphere the π used to obtain the area will be different.

Another question to ask is that if S=π(sub1)r^2 is the area of the circle and C=π(sub2)2r is the circumference why π(sub1)=π(sub2)=π ? What geometries or metrics will result in π(sub1)≠π(sub2) ?

From:
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions...to-3-14159


If no issues, then this is generally the answer that satisfies my question. Even if pi was definitely a normal number, I still would've asked this question.
Reply
#73
RE: Applicability of Maths to the Universe
(June 17, 2020 at 12:08 pm)Grandizer Wrote: polymath, can you tell me if there is any issue with this answer?

Quote:Why is this number equal to 3.14159....? Why is it not some other (ir)rational number?

Answer is that with the usual Euclidean metric that is the number that one gets, the value of π is dependent on the geometry that is being used, so on a sphere the π used to obtain the area will be different.

Another question to ask is that if S=π(sub1)r^2 is the area of the circle and C=π(sub2)2r is the circumference why π(sub1)=π(sub2)=π ? What geometries or metrics will result in π(sub1)≠π(sub2) ?

From:
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions...to-3-14159


If no issues, then this is generally the answer that satisfies my question. Even if pi was definitely a normal number, I still would've asked this question.

On a sphere, the ratio between radius and area (or circumference) of a circle is not a constant at all. For example, if you are at the north pole, the equator is a 'circle' whose circumference is 4 times the radius (not 2pi). But, the limit as the radius goes to 0 will give you pi back. Similarly for the area.

We choose circles because we have a distance function making R^2 into an inner product space, leading to the Pythagorean metric. If you use a 'taxicab' metric, the ratio would be 4sqrt(2) for the circumference and 2 for the area.

Or, you could live on a cone. At the vertex, you would have a constant ratio of radius to circumference (and for that matter between area and the square of the radius) and the ratio would depend on the opening angle of the cone, but at other points it would be the usual value of pi (if you measure distance in the cone).
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Photo Popular atheist says universe is not a work of art like a painting Walter99 32 3266 March 22, 2021 at 1:24 pm
Last Post: LadyForCamus
  I am a pixieist, what do you think of my proof that universe creating pixies exist? Simon Moon 69 10498 November 13, 2016 at 9:16 am
Last Post: Expired
  What's your crazy ideas about the existence of the universe? Vegamo 32 8624 April 1, 2014 at 2:30 pm
Last Post: archangle
  Is the universe God? Lek 89 20736 February 9, 2014 at 1:07 am
Last Post: Esquilax
  I know how the universe was created Chriswt 36 20708 November 27, 2012 at 5:04 pm
Last Post: Vincent Sauve
  This cruel universe I love so dearly Purple Rabbit 36 19737 July 13, 2009 at 4:27 pm
Last Post: Purple Rabbit



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)