Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 29, 2024, 12:55 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Statistically Speaking
#41
RE: Statistically Speaking
(June 13, 2020 at 6:29 am)UtilitarianDeist Wrote:
(June 13, 2020 at 6:28 am)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: Again, sweeping generalization.

No.

It would be a sweeping generalization if and only if I said that 'all the white cops are racist to all the black non-cops'.
LOL, no. You said "all cops". That's a sweeping generalization. No weaseling.
Reply
#42
RE: Statistically Speaking
(June 13, 2020 at 6:47 am)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote:
(June 13, 2020 at 6:29 am)UtilitarianDeist Wrote: No.

It would be a sweeping generalization if and only if I said that 'all the white cops are racist to all the black non-cops'.
LOL, no. You said "all cops". That's a sweeping generalization. No weaseling.

I never said all cops. So rather than falsely accuse me of weaseling please retract your claim as your claim is that I said something that I never actually said as is demonstrated by the fact that if you read my posts you won't find me ever saying it.
Reply
#43
RE: Statistically Speaking
(June 13, 2020 at 6:49 am)UtilitarianDeist Wrote:
(June 13, 2020 at 6:47 am)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: LOL, no. You said "all cops". That's a sweeping generalization. No weaseling.

I never said all cops. So rather than falsely accuse me of weaseling please retract your claim as your claim is that I said something that I never actually said as is demonstrated by the fact that if you read my posts you won't find me ever saying it.

My bad, you said "The white cops are racist to the black non-cops." That's a sweeping generalization. Do you not remember what you posted?
Reply
#44
RE: Statistically Speaking
(June 13, 2020 at 6:51 am)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote:
(June 13, 2020 at 6:49 am)UtilitarianDeist Wrote: I never said all cops. So rather than falsely accuse me of weaseling please retract your claim as your claim is that I said something that I never actually said as is demonstrated by the fact that if you read my posts you won't find me ever saying it.

My bad, you said "The white cops are racist to the black non-cops." That's a sweeping generalization. Do you not remember what you posted?

Yes I do and do you remember that I said that it's not a sweeping generalization because I *didn't* say all cops and then do you remember that your response to that was that I did say it and that you now acknowledge that you were wrong about that because I in fact didn't say it.
Reply
#45
RE: Statistically Speaking
He's bad at words, is all. We can generously assume that when he said that white cops were racist against black non cops he had the group of racist cops in mind.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#46
RE: Statistically Speaking
(June 13, 2020 at 6:52 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: He's bad at words, is all.  We can generously assume that when he said that white cops were racist against black non cops he had the group of racist cops in mind.

It's hardly a 'generous' assumption to assume that I think that the racist white cops are being racists and it's a lot more silly to assume that I would be making the absurd claim that all X is Y when I never said 'all'. This is just basic charitability in philosophy. I'm not bad at words because another person inserts a word into my sentence that I never said. That means *they're* bad at words.
Reply
#47
RE: Statistically Speaking
(June 13, 2020 at 6:52 am)UtilitarianDeist Wrote:
(June 13, 2020 at 6:51 am)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: My bad, you said "The white cops are racist to the black non-cops." That's a sweeping generalization. Do you not remember what you posted?

Yes I do and do you remember that I said that it's not a sweeping generalization because I *didn't* say all cops and then do you remember that your response to that was that I did say it and that you now acknowledge that you were wrong about that because I in fact didn't say it.
Damn, boy, you are a quibbler, just not a very good one.
Reply
#48
RE: Statistically Speaking
(June 13, 2020 at 6:56 am)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote:
(June 13, 2020 at 6:52 am)UtilitarianDeist Wrote: Yes I do and do you remember that I said that it's not a sweeping generalization because I *didn't* say all cops and then do you remember that your response to that was that I did say it and that you now acknowledge that you were wrong about that because I in fact didn't say it.
Damn, boy, you are a quibbler, just not a very good one.

If you say so. From what I can see you said I did something that I didn't do based on something that I didn't say and then you afterwards admitted that I was right about not saying the very thing that you said meant I was doing something that I didn't do.
Reply
#49
RE: Statistically Speaking
(June 13, 2020 at 6:57 am)UtilitarianDeist Wrote:
(June 13, 2020 at 6:56 am)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: Damn, boy, you are a quibbler, just not a very good one.

If you say so. From what I can see you said I did something that I didn't do based on something that I didn't say and then you afterwards admitted that I was right about not saying the very thing that you said meant I was doing something that I didn't do.

Let me guess, you're sophomore Philosophy, right?
Reply
#50
RE: Statistically Speaking
(June 13, 2020 at 7:06 am)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote:
(June 13, 2020 at 6:57 am)UtilitarianDeist Wrote: If you say so. From what I can see you said I did something that I didn't do based on something that I didn't say and then you afterwards admitted that I was right about not saying the very thing that you said meant I was doing something that I didn't do.

Let me guess, you're sophomore Philosophy, right?

I just had to Google sophmore and I got this:

"In the United States, a sophomore (/ˈsɑːfmɔːr/ or /ˈsɒfəmɔːr/)[1][2] is a student in the second year of study at high school (Class-10) or college."


No.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  No Wonder He Commands Those Speaking Fees BrianSoddingBoru4 5 306 August 21, 2020 at 3:05 am
Last Post: Deesse23



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)