(July 27, 2020 at 3:24 am)Cherub19 Wrote: I’m really looking for an episode in history in which gays were persecuted.
There were times and places where an accusation of sodomy could ruin your life. Whether that meets your definition of "persecution" or not I don't know.
Quote:And I believe your statement “this isn’t a community in the sense we’re using it now” has concluded the debate on this topic decisively in my favor. Thank you.
If people now use the word "community" to refer to a group with a consistent ethnicity or orientation which work together for political goals, then I don't think the gay community met those criteria until recently.
I also don't think it's quite the definitive win you're looking for.
Quote:planned and guided all along by an unseen hand
And let me guess -- it's the Jews, right?
No, the idea that there is a secret cabal gradually handing out equal rights for nefarious reasons is foolishness.
That said, I do think that many of what we consider to be advances have come about for economic reasons, not moral ones.
So for example, we are all happy that women have the choice to enter the workplace on an equal footing with men. (Or we're getting there.) This came about partly because of increasing enlightenment, but also because employers figured out that if they doubled the workforce, they could pay less. The result has been that single-worker families used to live comfortably because the worker (usually a man) was paid enough for the whole family to live, but now both people in a couple have to work to have the same standard of living. Benefits have been cut and real wages have fallen, and now women have the freedom to work or starve just as men used to.
There is something similar happening with gay people, too. By recognizing gay marriage and equal opportunities, gay people are allowed full participation in the economic life. They can take out a mortgage and buy life insurance just like straights. There are of course advantages for the gay people, but it may be that the people selling the mortgages and insurance benefit more, which is partly why it's come about.
Compare this with what Gide wrote about gay life in Paris. (And what I know of gay life in Tokyo.) It was an
alternative to the standard bourgeois life. Granted, it was an alternative that was partly forced on people, but Gide among others recognized that the gay life -- the gay community, as it then was -- was something different and in some ways more sincere, just because it was chosen, at some risk, and not the standard default.
I saw a documentary about the gay scene in Tokyo post-war, and they interviewed the proprietor of one of the oldest gay bars, where Mishima and others used to drink. They asked him if it wasn't terrible in the old days when you had to hide your orientation. And he answered, "u-tsu-ku-shi-katta." "It was beautiful."
By drawing same-sex couples into standard bourgeois life, something is gained but something is lost. Equal rights are always a great thing, and gay marriage is supported by all sane people. But alternatives are important too.