Posts: 16958
Threads: 461
Joined: March 29, 2015
Reputation:
30
RE: Religious people get very little reps, it's xenophobia and religionism.
July 6, 2021 at 4:50 pm
(This post was last modified: July 6, 2021 at 6:49 pm by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(July 6, 2021 at 3:14 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: (July 6, 2021 at 2:43 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: For those closely watching, drich sent me a list of possibly the most stupid questions ever. I am seeking his permission to post them because they are funny as fuck.
No patent number though.
Quote:Moderator Notice Removed posted private correspondence. This is not allowed, even with the permission of the other parties involved.
Seems like Drich is turning into L Ron Hubbard - he wants your personal data so that he can own you and manipulate you.
teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"
Posts: 6112
Threads: 53
Joined: September 25, 2018
Reputation:
20
RE: Religious people get very little reps, it's xenophobia and religionism.
July 6, 2021 at 6:01 pm
I think we're giving drickhead far too much credit. A sippy cup is beyond drick's ability to comprehend. His daddy is helping him along.
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: Religious people get very little reps, it's xenophobia and religionism.
July 7, 2021 at 2:04 pm
(July 6, 2021 at 2:43 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: For those closely watching, drich sent me a list of possibly the most stupid questions ever. I am seeking his permission to post them because they are funny as fuck.
No patent number though.
that list of things i asked for are things that the email i am offering contain about me. seeings how your reading comprehension is not as on par as you would have us believe, That was me explaining to you why, i did not offer this email openly. because everything on the list that you in no way shape or form would want me to know, would be exposed to you, You being someone who does not like me, and does not have the same religious restrictions concerning integrity and respect for others as i do.
quid pro quo Clarise.. quid pro quo..
if you are not willing to make that information known, then why would you ask the same of me? why would you continue to press and do your best to pressure me into giving you this info? Again sport, if you will not trust me with that information why should i trust you?
Do you understand the reason for the list now?
Posts: 46122
Threads: 538
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Religious people get very little reps, it's xenophobia and religionism.
July 7, 2021 at 2:10 pm
(This post was last modified: July 7, 2021 at 2:11 pm by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(July 7, 2021 at 2:04 pm)Drich Wrote: (July 6, 2021 at 2:43 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: For those closely watching, drich sent me a list of possibly the most stupid questions ever. I am seeking his permission to post them because they are funny as fuck.
No patent number though.
that list of things i asked for are things that the email i am offering contain about me. seeings how your reading comprehension is not as on par as you would have us believe, That was me explaining to you why, i did not offer this email openly. because everything on the list that you in no way shape or form would want me to know, would be exposed to you, You being someone who does not like me, and does not have the same religious restrictions concerning integrity and respect for others as i do.
quid pro quo Clarise.. quid pro quo..
if you are not willing to make that information known, then why would you ask the same of me? why would you continue to press and do your best to pressure me into giving you this info? Again sport, if you will not trust me with that information why should i trust you?
Do you understand the reason for the list now?
If I were to provide you with my email, would you want me to answer the same questions you sent to Abaddon_ire, prior to sending me the documents?
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: Religious people get very little reps, it's xenophobia and religionism.
July 7, 2021 at 2:12 pm
(July 6, 2021 at 3:14 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: (July 6, 2021 at 2:43 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: For those closely watching, drich sent me a list of possibly the most stupid questions ever. I am seeking his permission to post them because they are funny as fuck.
No patent number though.
Fukkit. Here are the demands.
Moderator Notice Removed posted private correspondence. This is not allowed, with or without the permission of other parties involved.
Of course, none of this is even vaguely relevant to the claims made.
mods please be reminded i was given a two week vaca for doing the same minus calling out the poster. IE i did not dox an individual just shared content of a pm and was ban for two weeks. No prior warning no opportunity (was never asked) to take it down. I'm and not asking you to suspend this guy, just come clean and tell us the rules are applied less formally to atheists. (If that is the case) As i 1/2 way broke a rule got two weeks and this guy makes a clean break and i can still chat with him.
what's worse i told this guy sharing pm and emails were against the rules. rules you guys were on top of due to my recent banning. which is why i offered my emails to the mods and admins as administration of the no pm rule seemed to be taken seriously by all. if this guy isn't bann and the rules are just applied less formally to atheist members then i have to reconsider my offer as the protection i thought i was entitled to is clearly not there for me. even though former members/nonactive members pms can be protected under this rule.
Posts: 67193
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Religious people get very little reps, it's xenophobia and religionism.
July 7, 2021 at 2:14 pm
That’s an awfully long winded way to acknowledge that you have no patent and never had any real plan to sell the lie that you did.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: Religious people get very little reps, it's xenophobia and religionism.
July 7, 2021 at 2:15 pm
(This post was last modified: July 7, 2021 at 2:23 pm by Drich.)
(July 6, 2021 at 3:24 pm)Nomad Wrote: (July 6, 2021 at 3:14 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: Fukkit. Here are the demands.
Moderator Notice Removed posted private correspondence. This is not allowed, with or without the permission of other parties involved.
Of course, none of this is even vaguely relevant to the claims made.
Jaysus, a guard wouldn't ask you that.
Basicly Dripshit has been caught out lying and instead of coming clean and admitting it the little lying shit is deflecting and trying to make you out to be the bad guy. actually no.. the list was a list of info my email contains about me. I compiled this list and asked ire if he wouldn't mind sharing the same info. as he clearly does not want an opponent to have that info i asked then why do you ask it of me?
(July 7, 2021 at 2:10 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: (July 7, 2021 at 2:04 pm)Drich Wrote: that list of things i asked for are things that the email i am offering contain about me. seeings how your reading comprehension is not as on par as you would have us believe, That was me explaining to you why, i did not offer this email openly. because everything on the list that you in no way shape or form would want me to know, would be exposed to you, You being someone who does not like me, and does not have the same religious restrictions concerning integrity and respect for others as i do.
quid pro quo Clarise.. quid pro quo..
if you are not willing to make that information known, then why would you ask the same of me? why would you continue to press and do your best to pressure me into giving you this info? Again sport, if you will not trust me with that information why should i trust you?
Do you understand the reason for the list now?
If I were to provide you with my email, would you want me to answer the same questions you sent to Abaddon_ire, prior to sending me the documents?
Boru
no.. the list if information the email contains about me. the point I was making bad don edited out was if he would not want me to have this same information about him, then why would i would i openly share the same info about me. but it worries me that if abaddon is allowed to dox our pms and post damage is done all he gets is a warning and a mod edit, while i got suspended for 2 weeks for just copying text without outing anyone. what is stopping you?
clearly the rules do not apply to atheists as they do for me. what would make me then think that any of the rules would apply to you? You could do some serious damage to me, or rather let it happen by doing the same thing abadon did and retract after the damage has been done.
look how the whole discussion has changed since his post of our pm and his selective editing.
(July 7, 2021 at 2:14 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: That’s an awfully long winded way to acknowledge that you have no patent and never had any real plan to sell the lie that you did.
what was?
Posts: 46122
Threads: 538
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Religious people get very little reps, it's xenophobia and religionism.
July 7, 2021 at 2:35 pm
(July 7, 2021 at 2:12 pm)Drich Wrote: (July 6, 2021 at 3:14 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: Fukkit. Here are the demands.
Moderator Notice Removed posted private correspondence. This is not allowed, with or without the permission of other parties involved.
Of course, none of this is even vaguely relevant to the claims made.
mods please be reminded i was given a two week vaca for doing the same minus calling out the poster. IE i did not dox an individual just shared content of a pm and was ban for two weeks. No prior warning no opportunity (was never asked) to take it down. I'm and not asking you to suspend this guy, just come clean and tell us the rules are applied less formally to atheists. (If that is the case) As i 1/2 way broke a rule got two weeks and this guy makes a clean break and i can still chat with him.
what's worse i told this guy sharing pm and emails were against the rules. rules you guys were on top of due to my recent banning. which is why i offered my emails to the mods and admins as administration of the no pm rule seemed to be taken seriously by all. if this guy isn't bann and the rules are just applied less formally to atheist members then i have to reconsider my offer as the protection i thought i was entitled to is clearly not there for me. even though former members/nonactive members pms can be protected under this rule.
First off, it was a one week suspension, not two.
While the rules apply to everyone equally, punishments do not. You have a substantial history of breaking the rules, and Abaddon does not. In consultation, it was agreed that you, personally, needed more than just a warning, since you don’t seem either willing or able to modify your behaviour on that basis alone. In other words, you didn’t get spanked for being naughty, you got spanked for being an incorrigibly naughty boy.
The difference in the punishments wasn’t because you’re a believer and Abaddon isn’t. It’s more personal than that.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: Religious people get very little reps, it's xenophobia and religionism.
July 7, 2021 at 3:37 pm
(July 7, 2021 at 2:35 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: (July 7, 2021 at 2:12 pm)Drich Wrote: mods please be reminded i was given a two week vaca for doing the same minus calling out the poster. IE i did not dox an individual just shared content of a pm and was ban for two weeks. No prior warning no opportunity (was never asked) to take it down. I'm and not asking you to suspend this guy, just come clean and tell us the rules are applied less formally to atheists. (If that is the case) As i 1/2 way broke a rule got two weeks and this guy makes a clean break and i can still chat with him.
what's worse i told this guy sharing pm and emails were against the rules. rules you guys were on top of due to my recent banning. which is why i offered my emails to the mods and admins as administration of the no pm rule seemed to be taken seriously by all. if this guy isn't bann and the rules are just applied less formally to atheist members then i have to reconsider my offer as the protection i thought i was entitled to is clearly not there for me. even though former members/nonactive members pms can be protected under this rule.
First off, it was a one week suspension, not two.
While the rules apply to everyone equally, punishments do not. You have a substantial history of breaking the rules, and Abaddon does not. In consultation, it was agreed that you, personally, needed more than just a warning, since you don’t seem either willing or able to modify your behaviour on that basis alone. In other words, you didn’t get spanked for being naughty, you got spanked for being an incorrigibly naughty boy.
The difference in the punishments wasn’t because you’re a believer and Abaddon isn’t. It’s more personal than that.
Boru
do i break the rules though? I got a warning because someone took offense to a work i made up from two other words. One meaning dirt or soil, and the other meaning a parasitic plant.. for someone this word meant i was flamming. Is it my fault someone didn't get the joke?
oh and the spam bot got me because, 5 or 6 people asked me the same exact question so to each one of them i cut and pasted the same answer. Any fair minded person would have not even been bother by this.. and for a title of a thread that i do not remember. but what ever just a 10pt warning.
and then this last time again i took a pm removed all identification to prove yet again i was telling the truth. and banned again.
i went back to 2016 and did not find another offense.
So what rules exactly am i breaking if i am not reprimanded for them?
I am going off of pm from you or other mods. maybe you have a list i do not.
so a total of 4 very minor/trivial offenses in what 5 years? and this is with the majority of the members ratting me out for any and every infraction possible? Simply because they can not get to me any other way?
To be honest i don't want anyone bann on my account anyway. forgive and forget unless someone is just being disruptive for the sake of it. just wanted to admit you apply the rules differently and you did that. no matter the reason the truth of it is out there and i thank you for that.
Posts: 16461
Threads: 127
Joined: July 10, 2013
Reputation:
65
RE: Religious people get very little reps, it's xenophobia and religionism.
July 7, 2021 at 3:40 pm
(July 7, 2021 at 3:37 pm)Drich Wrote: (July 7, 2021 at 2:35 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: First off, it was a one week suspension, not two.
While the rules apply to everyone equally, punishments do not. You have a substantial history of breaking the rules, and Abaddon does not. In consultation, it was agreed that you, personally, needed more than just a warning, since you don’t seem either willing or able to modify your behaviour on that basis alone. In other words, you didn’t get spanked for being naughty, you got spanked for being an incorrigibly naughty boy.
The difference in the punishments wasn’t because you’re a believer and Abaddon isn’t. It’s more personal than that.
Boru
do i break the rules though? I got a warning because someone took offense to a work i made up from two other words. One meaning dirt or soil, and the other meaning a parasitic plant.. for someone this word meant i was flamming. Is it my fault someone didn't get the joke?
oh and the spam bot got me because, 5 or 6 people asked me the same exact question so to each one of them i cut and pasted the same answer. Any fair minded person would have not even been bother by this.. and for a title of a thread that i do not remember. but what ever just a 10pt warning.
and then this last time again i took a pm removed all identification to prove yet again i was telling the truth. and banned again.
i went back to 2016 and did not find another offense.
So what rules exactly am i breaking if i am not reprimanded for them?
I am going off of pm from you or other mods. maybe you have a list i do not.
so a total of 4 very minor/trivial offenses in what 5 years? and this is with the majority of the members ratting me out for any and every infraction possible? Simply because they can not get to me any other way?
To be honest i don't want anyone bann on my account anyway. forgive and forget unless someone is just being disruptive for the sake of it. just wanted to admit you apply the rules differently and you did that. no matter the reason the truth of it is out there and i thank you for that.
You sure want to stay here with the heathens, doncha Sport?
|