Posts: 28448
Threads: 525
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
90
RE: Veridican Argument for the Existence of God
January 16, 2022 at 12:09 pm
(This post was last modified: January 16, 2022 at 12:10 pm by brewer.)
Fantastic, you've just shown me that god is a man made concept and exists no where else except in humans minds. Congratulations.
Edit: Could we (the forum community) interest you in creating an introduction thread so that we can get to know each other better?
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
Posts: 6112
Threads: 53
Joined: September 25, 2018
Reputation:
20
RE: Veridican Argument for the Existence of God
January 16, 2022 at 12:15 pm
No matter how you dress it, bullshit is still bullshit.
Posts: 1750
Threads: 0
Joined: December 11, 2019
Reputation:
9
RE: Veridican Argument for the Existence of God
January 16, 2022 at 12:17 pm
God is, after all, the entire physical universe
Your assumption is also your conclusion. Fail.
Posts: 1664
Threads: 5
Joined: September 26, 2018
Reputation:
12
RE: Veridican Argument for the Existence of God
January 16, 2022 at 12:22 pm
None of those Axioms are testable, except #2 (which is just an acknowledgement of reality existing)
I am willing to entertain the possibility of 1 through 5, but I do not see the logical necessity for any of them.
#6 is just junk. By this logic, the "one thing that exists" is part Chevy Malibu, because we know a Chevy Malibu exists, and the axioms say only one thing exists, therefore that one thing must be part Chevy Malibu.
Posts: 9915
Threads: 53
Joined: November 27, 2015
Reputation:
92
RE: Veridican Argument for the Existence of God
January 16, 2022 at 12:25 pm
(This post was last modified: January 16, 2022 at 12:49 pm by LadyForCamus.)
Axiom 1 is logically self-refuting bullshit. How can nothingness be a state of affairs? Nothingness, by definition, cannot be anything, because then it would be something, not nothing. You haven’t demonstrated in axiom 3 that physical reality itself can’t exist necessarily and that it requires a god, so that one fails. Axiom 6, which attempts to get around the possibility of physical reality existing necessarily, is nothing more than an unsupported assertion with no rational justification whatsoever. Your just crammed your conclusion into the last premise.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Posts: 29872
Threads: 116
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
159
RE: Veridican Argument for the Existence of God
January 16, 2022 at 12:29 pm
#4 Equivocation;
#5 More equivocation;
#6 Composition fallacy;
#1-#6 Begging the question.
So, what you're saying is that you don't exist?
I think that I can live with that.
Posts: 2785
Threads: 5
Joined: September 21, 2018
Reputation:
33
RE: Veridican Argument for the Existence of God
January 16, 2022 at 12:36 pm
(This post was last modified: January 16, 2022 at 12:36 pm by Deesse23.)
Word games and equivocations. If you need to do any of this, you have nothing worthwhile.
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse
Posts: 46480
Threads: 543
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Veridican Argument for the Existence of God
January 16, 2022 at 12:57 pm
Rev Edward J. Gordon appears to be an idiot. As has been ably pointed out, there are glaring and egregious errors in that non-argument that wouldn’t be made by a first year logic student.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 16649
Threads: 128
Joined: July 10, 2013
Reputation:
65
RE: Veridican Argument for the Existence of God
January 16, 2022 at 1:10 pm
Egor! It's you again...different name but I know who you are.