Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 28, 2022, 8:08 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post your favorite proof
#11
RE: Post your favorite proof
Must admit I always did love/like Paul Lynde's delivery of comedy.

   ..........


Oh, wait! "PROOFS" !   Doh

I'll see myself out....

Not at work.
Reply
#12
RE: Post your favorite proof
Math makes me cry.
 “Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe.” ~Albert Einstein                                                 
Reply
#13
RE: Post your favorite proof
Knock-down argument/proof against universal skepticism:

U: Universal skepticism: For any assertion P, we don't know if P is true or false.

Proof: The assertion U: "For any assertion P, we don't know if P is true or false" is either true or false. If it's true, we know at least that one assertion is true (U itself) therefore it's false. QED.
Qur'anic revelation is the sole path to ultimate reality. All argumentation and philosophy is an expression of arrogance and an overestimation of human cognitive ability. 

"But believe me, Cleanthes, the most natural feeling that a well-disposed mind will have on this occasion is a longing desire and expectation that God will be pleased to remove or at least to lessen this profound ignorance, by giving mankind some particular revelation, revealing the nature, attributes, and operations of the divine object of our faith." (Hume's Dialogues)


Reply
#14
RE: Post your favorite proof
(April 18, 2022 at 5:35 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: Knock-down argument/proof against universal skepticism:

U: Universal skepticism: For any assertion P, we don't know if P is true or false.

Proof: The assertion U: "For any assertion P, we don't know if P is true or false" is either true or false. If it's true, we know at least that one assertion is true (U itself) therefore it's false. QED.

You're very yeasty, and yet un-risen.

I'll call you Hoastie.

[Image: 61pW7jPEUaL._SL1500_.jpg]
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem




Reply
#15
RE: Post your favorite proof
(April 18, 2022 at 7:29 pm)brewer Wrote:
(April 18, 2022 at 5:35 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: Knock-down argument/proof against universal skepticism:

U: Universal skepticism: For any assertion P, we don't know if P is true or false.

Proof: The assertion U: "For any assertion P, we don't know if P is true or false" is either true or false. If it's true, we know at least that one assertion is true (U itself) therefore it's false. QED.

You're very yeasty, and yet un-risen.

I'll call you Hoastie.

[Image: 61pW7jPEUaL._SL1500_.jpg]
That's far more polite then what i would call him  Hehe
“The sun from far gives life. But get close to it and it burns anything down to ashes”

[Image: flag-ukraine_1f1fa-1f1e6.png]  Heart [Image: canada-google.png]        

 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
#16
RE: Post your favorite proof
^^^ He's beyond help, jokes are the best we can do.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem




Reply
#17
RE: Post your favorite proof
[Image: dilbert-why-are-you-an-engineer.gif]
[Image: Fenrir-sign.jpg]
Reply
#18
RE: Post your favorite proof
This proof of the Pythagorean theorem: https://flatassembler.github.io/pseudosc...troduction
Reply
#19
RE: Post your favorite proof
(April 18, 2022 at 5:35 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: Knock-down argument/proof against universal skepticism:

U: Universal skepticism: For any assertion P, we don't know if P is true or false.

Proof: The assertion U: "For any assertion P, we don't know if P is true or false" is either true or false. If it's true, we know at least that one assertion is true (U itself) therefore it's false. QED.

If you find a universal skeptic here, let me know.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
Reply
#20
RE: Post your favorite proof
(April 19, 2022 at 10:43 am)Mister Agenda Wrote:
(April 18, 2022 at 5:35 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: Knock-down argument/proof against universal skepticism:

U: Universal skepticism: For any assertion P, we don't know if P is true or false.

Proof: The assertion U: "For any assertion P, we don't know if P is true or false" is either true or false. If it's true, we know at least that one assertion is true (U itself) therefore it's false. QED.

If you find a universal skeptic here, let me know.

I cogitate, therefore, I am.
And without delay Peter went quickly out of the synagogue (assembly) and went unto the house of Marcellus, where Simon lodged: and much people followed him...And Peter turned unto the people that followed him and said: Ye shall now see a great and marvellous wonder. And Peter seeing a great dog bound with a strong chain, went to him and loosed him, and when he was loosed the dog received a man's voice and said unto Peter: What dost thou bid me to do, thou servant of the unspeakable and living God? Peter said unto him: Go in and say unto Simon in the midst of his company: Peter saith unto thee, Come forth abroad, for thy sake am I come to Rome, thou wicked one and deceiver of simple souls. And immediately the dog ran and entered in, and rushed into the midst of them that were with Simon, and lifted up his forefeet and in a loud voice said: Thou Simon, Peter the servant of Christ who standeth at the door saith unto thee: Come forth abroad, for thy sake am I come to Rome, thou most wicked one and deceiver of simple souls. And when Simon heard it, and beheld the incredible sight, he lost the words wherewith he was deceiving them that stood by, and all of them were amazed. (The Acts of Peter, 9)
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proof by Rearrangement of the Pythagorean Theorem FlatAssembler 10 1298 November 22, 2018 at 7:13 pm
Last Post: Reltzik
  The Mathematical Proof Thread Kernel Sohcahtoa 67 11258 July 6, 2018 at 8:37 pm
Last Post: Fireball
  What's your favorite integer? Foxaire 25 2157 March 28, 2018 at 10:34 am
Last Post: bennyboy
  Million Dollar Prize for Math proof of NP problems emilynghiem 6 2817 February 22, 2015 at 12:47 am
Last Post: vorlon13
  "Gödel's ontological proof" proves existence of God Belac Enrobso 41 15686 February 9, 2015 at 3:22 am
Last Post: Alex K
  Mathematical proof.. lifesagift 20 5744 September 26, 2014 at 5:01 pm
Last Post: lifesagift
Information My proof for de morgans law LogicMaster 17 4898 May 29, 2014 at 7:55 pm
Last Post: Cyberman
  Mathematician Claims Proof of Connection between Prime Numbers KichigaiNeko 10 6692 September 26, 2012 at 3:18 am
Last Post: Categories+Sheaves
  Need a proof (real analysis) CliveStaples 8 5562 August 2, 2012 at 10:11 pm
Last Post: CliveStaples
  Mathematical proof of the existence of God JudgeDracoAmunRa 20 11771 March 30, 2012 at 11:43 am
Last Post: JudgeDracoAmunRa



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)