Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 26, 2026, 11:34 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post your favorite proof
#11
RE: Post your favorite proof
Must admit I always did love/like Paul Lynde's delivery of comedy.

   ..........


Oh, wait! "PROOFS" !   Doh

I'll see myself out....

Not at work.
Reply
#12
RE: Post your favorite proof
Math makes me cry.
What fresh hell can this be? - Dorothy Parker
Reply
#13
RE: Post your favorite proof
Knock-down argument/proof against universal skepticism:

U: Universal skepticism: For any assertion P, we don't know if P is true or false.

Proof: The assertion U: "For any assertion P, we don't know if P is true or false" is either true or false. If it's true, we know at least that one assertion is true (U itself) therefore it's false. QED.
Reply
#14
RE: Post your favorite proof
(April 18, 2022 at 5:35 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: Knock-down argument/proof against universal skepticism:

U: Universal skepticism: For any assertion P, we don't know if P is true or false.

Proof: The assertion U: "For any assertion P, we don't know if P is true or false" is either true or false. If it's true, we know at least that one assertion is true (U itself) therefore it's false. QED.

You're very yeasty, and yet un-risen.

I'll call you Hoastie.

[Image: 61pW7jPEUaL._SL1500_.jpg]
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Reply
#15
RE: Post your favorite proof
(April 18, 2022 at 7:29 pm)brewer Wrote:
(April 18, 2022 at 5:35 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: Knock-down argument/proof against universal skepticism:

U: Universal skepticism: For any assertion P, we don't know if P is true or false.

Proof: The assertion U: "For any assertion P, we don't know if P is true or false" is either true or false. If it's true, we know at least that one assertion is true (U itself) therefore it's false. QED.

You're very yeasty, and yet un-risen.

I'll call you Hoastie.

[Image: 61pW7jPEUaL._SL1500_.jpg]
That's far more polite then what i would call him  Hehe
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
#16
RE: Post your favorite proof
^^^ He's beyond help, jokes are the best we can do.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Reply
#17
RE: Post your favorite proof
[Image: dilbert-why-are-you-an-engineer.gif]
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
#18
RE: Post your favorite proof
This proof of the Pythagorean theorem: https://flatassembler.github.io/pseudosc...troduction
Reply
#19
RE: Post your favorite proof
(April 18, 2022 at 5:35 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: Knock-down argument/proof against universal skepticism:

U: Universal skepticism: For any assertion P, we don't know if P is true or false.

Proof: The assertion U: "For any assertion P, we don't know if P is true or false" is either true or false. If it's true, we know at least that one assertion is true (U itself) therefore it's false. QED.

If you find a universal skeptic here, let me know.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
Reply
#20
RE: Post your favorite proof
(April 19, 2022 at 10:43 am)Mister Agenda Wrote:
(April 18, 2022 at 5:35 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: Knock-down argument/proof against universal skepticism:

U: Universal skepticism: For any assertion P, we don't know if P is true or false.

Proof: The assertion U: "For any assertion P, we don't know if P is true or false" is either true or false. If it's true, we know at least that one assertion is true (U itself) therefore it's false. QED.

If you find a universal skeptic here, let me know.

I cogitate, therefore, I am.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Truth: The Mathematical Proof of God, The Holy Trinity kingiyk3 2 1951 January 30, 2025 at 5:13 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  Proof by Rearrangement of the Pythagorean Theorem FlatAssembler 10 3987 November 22, 2018 at 7:13 pm
Last Post: Reltzik
  The Mathematical Proof Thread Kernel Sohcahtoa 67 26775 July 6, 2018 at 8:37 pm
Last Post: Fireball
  What's your favorite integer? Paraselene 25 6368 March 28, 2018 at 10:34 am
Last Post: bennyboy
  Million Dollar Prize for Math proof of NP problems emilynghiem 6 4054 February 22, 2015 at 12:47 am
Last Post: vorlon13
  "Gödel's ontological proof" proves existence of God Belac Enrobso 41 27662 February 9, 2015 at 3:22 am
Last Post: Alex K
  Mathematical proof.. lifesagift 20 10663 September 26, 2014 at 5:01 pm
Last Post: lifesagift
Information My proof for de morgans law LogicMaster 17 8992 May 29, 2014 at 7:55 pm
Last Post: Cyberman
  Mathematician Claims Proof of Connection between Prime Numbers KichigaiNeko 10 9301 September 26, 2012 at 3:18 am
Last Post: Categories+Sheaves
  Need a proof (real analysis) CliveStaples 8 7419 August 2, 2012 at 10:11 pm
Last Post: CliveStaples



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)