The Absurd GOP

[arewethereyet]

Exactly -- a woman is much more at risk at home, statistically.

And a woman in the bathroom with a man who wants to harm her is at much more risk there than at home, statistically.

Quite simply - women are going to spend more time at home than in public bathrooms with scary boogeymen. 

How many women being hurt is an acceptable number?  Let's look into domestic abuse victims and how well LE listens to their concerns...how well protection orders work...how often women carry the abuse at home with them silently.

I am starting to wonder if your supposed paranoia over scary men in women's public bathrooms is because this is your fantasy.

[The Architect Of Fate]

These people do  have weird freaking preoccupation with this.

[arewethereyet]

These people do  have weird freaking preoccupation with this.

If they point out the non-issues enough, perhaps people won't notice the real issues.

[h4ym4n]

Again, do you have numbers on these incidents? Don't think I've forgotten that you haven't answered this question. It's nice you took a day or two off from shitposting, but you still are ignoring this:

No, because I am not going to waste my time looking for an irrelevant number that the FBI doesn't track, at least not in something that can be found in a 5 minute search.

What statistical percentage of women being assaulted in bathrooms are you willing to say is low enough that we should introduce measures that increase the odds of "men who want to hurt women" being in those bathrooms?

How many women being harmed is okay in the name of ideology?

A .05% increase?

.50%?

5%?

Fucking pussy

[arewethereyet]

No, because I am not going to waste my time looking for an irrelevant number that the FBI doesn't track, at least not in something that can be found in a 5 minute search.

What statistical percentage of women being assaulted in bathrooms are you willing to say is low enough that we should introduce measures that increase the odds of "men who want to hurt women" being in those bathrooms?

How many women being harmed is okay in the name of ideology?

A .05% increase?

.50%?

5%?

Fucking pussy

Aww. C'mon, he's a busy dude that doesn't have five minutes to waste to prove he isn't just delusional.  Troll score 3/10.

[TheWhiteMarten]

So you're happy making a claim without any evidence whatsoever...

Occam's Razor.

Men objectively commit more acts of sexual and physical violence than women; 99% in regards to sexual violence.

Introducing men - who have an overwhelming dispossession to be the engagers in this violence - to a women's only environment will introduce men's tendency for violence into an environment where it would be by nature nearly non-existent.

It's not a trans issue, regardless of how much you want to make it one.

It's an issue of women's safety.

[h4ym4n]

So you're happy making a claim without any evidence whatsoever...

Occam's Razor.

Men, objectively, commit more acts of sexual violence against women at a significantly higher rate; 99% to 1%.

Allowing biological men - regardless of what they identify as or are in the process of transitioning into - access to areas that are traditionally female only will, based on the numbers above, objectively put more women at risk.

Evil men - not people who have whatever various ailment, be it biological or psychological, that causes them to feel trapped in the wrong body - will be given a new line of free access (without social disapproval or en guarde eyes) the more and more this is normalized.

This will - objectively - lead to more women being injured; there is simply no logical alternative; men + being around women = higher rates of sexual violence. And to jump the gun incase that trigger is pulled again; no, this does not mean *all* men are threats - just as my position has never meant transgendered people are whatever prerogative  you think I find them to be.

Why will restrooms be the one exception where men are not significantly more likely to commit violence, esp. given before mentioned issues like isolation and social stigmas?

Citations needed, pussy.

[TheWhiteMarten]

Cite your mom.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

So you're happy making a claim without any evidence whatsoever...

Occam's Razor.

Men objectively commit more acts of sexual and physical violence than women; 99% in regards to sexual violence.

Introducing men - who have an overwhelming dispossession to be the engagers in this violence - to a women's only environment will introduce men's tendency for violence into an environment where it would be by nature nearly non-existent.  

It's not a trans issue, regardless of how much you want to make it one.

It's an issue of women's safety.

We didn’t make it a trans issue, the GOP did when they introduced a bill to bar trans women from using restrooms that match their gender identity.

It IS a trans issue, no matter how much you delude yourself that it isn’t.

Boru

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Cite your mom.

Fuxxake. What are you, 12?

Boru