Posts: 4738
Threads: 7
Joined: October 17, 2013
Reputation:
15
RE: Women's Rights
April 21, 2023 at 6:29 pm
(April 21, 2023 at 12:49 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: (April 20, 2023 at 10:01 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: Also worth noting, some women, even cisgender women, are sterile. Doesn’t make them any less of a woman.
My mother had a hysterectomy in 1968 as part of treating her ovarian cancer. The logical conclusion of Huggy's ign'ant beliefs is that my mother is less of a woman.
That's something he surely would not say to a man's face IRL.
Why would that be the "logical conclusion" when a trans "woman" is incapable of getting ovarian cancer?
Y'all can't even define what a woman is... do you also reject the dictionary definition?
Posts: 6112
Threads: 53
Joined: September 25, 2018
Reputation:
20
RE: Women's Rights
April 21, 2023 at 7:00 pm
Why the fuck do you care?
Can't people just live their own lives?
Are you incapable of staying in your own lane?
You take your freedom to be imbecilic, narrow minded, incel, quiet seriously.
Perhaps, maybe, allow others to have their freedom in their serious pursuit of their OWN damn happiness?
You are no different than members of the kkk, taliban, nazis, or any other mindless rabble of herd following, hate filled shitbags.
Posts: 13155
Threads: 127
Joined: January 11, 2010
Reputation:
45
RE: Women's Rights
April 21, 2023 at 7:05 pm
(This post was last modified: April 21, 2023 at 7:06 pm by Rev. Rye.)
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.
I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
Posts: 8705
Threads: 40
Joined: March 18, 2014
Reputation:
54
RE: Women's Rights
April 21, 2023 at 8:03 pm
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Posts: 12231
Threads: 30
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation:
14
RE: Women's Rights
April 22, 2023 at 12:52 am
Quote:The article you linked to is entirely about male infertility. Lose of the sperm producing function does not mean one ceases to be of the kind that would produce sperm in the absence of disorder. A post-menapausal woman is still female, yes?
Nonetheless if a man were to no longer produce sperm he's still a man. Reproduction is not the primary definer of any group.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Posts: 12231
Threads: 30
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation:
14
RE: Women's Rights
April 22, 2023 at 1:08 am
Quote:Why would that be the "logical conclusion" when a trans "woman" is incapable of getting ovarian cancer?
And you are missing the point. A woman without a uterus is still a woman so having a uterus is not needed to be a woman.
Quote:Y'all can't even define what a woman is... do you also reject the dictionary definition?
We already did moron. Also, we wouldn't even need another definition to point out that the dictionary one is simplistic and incomplete.
You again demonstrate that you are the one who needs to sit down and STFU.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Posts: 25250
Threads: 28
Joined: February 2, 2010
Reputation:
105
RE: Women's Rights
April 22, 2023 at 4:57 am
(April 21, 2023 at 6:29 pm)Huggy Bear Wrote: (April 21, 2023 at 12:49 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: My mother had a hysterectomy in 1968 as part of treating her ovarian cancer. The logical conclusion of Huggy's ign'ant beliefs is that my mother is less of a woman.
That's something he surely would not say to a man's face IRL.
Why would that be the "logical conclusion" when a trans "woman" is incapable of getting ovarian cancer?
Y'all can't even define what a woman is... do you also reject the dictionary definition?
You apparently don't understand that I'm not arguing about trans women, but criticizing your devaluation of women.
You never were the brightest bulb in the chandelier, but you seem to have lost a lumen or two.
Posts: 12231
Threads: 30
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation:
14
RE: Women's Rights
April 22, 2023 at 5:13 am
(This post was last modified: April 22, 2023 at 5:14 am by The Architect Of Fate.)
He is also wrong as we have defined women and even if we had not you can say definition A is incomplete or wrong without requiring an alternative definition. This Non-Sequitur. And the dictionary definition as has been shown multiple times in this thread is insufficient and simplistic.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Posts: 52659
Threads: 567
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Women's Rights
April 22, 2023 at 6:06 am
(April 21, 2023 at 7:00 pm)no one Wrote: Why the fuck do you care?
Can't people just live their own lives?
Are you incapable of staying in your own lane?
You take your freedom to be imbecilic, narrow minded, incel, quiet seriously.
Perhaps, maybe, allow others to have their freedom in their serious pursuit of their OWN damn happiness?
You are no different than members of the kkk, taliban, nazis, or any other mindless rabble of herd following, hate filled shitbags.
Maybe it’s just me, but I can’t seem to gin up any bile against people who choose to live their lives differently from how I live mine.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 18708
Threads: 156
Joined: July 10, 2013
Reputation:
65
RE: Women's Rights
April 22, 2023 at 6:44 am
We have, in this thread, seen the big three who are most afraid of anyone with a different lifestyle. But all they can use to try to convince others to think the same is to throw the whole LGBT+ population into the molester of children and women pile. There's no other reason to be so hateful and fearful so they have to try to tug at emotion, fear, and false information.
I still would like to know how a cat with three legs has a damn thing to do with gender identification. Seems when you have to reach that damn far you are likely to fall on your face.
What fresh hell can this be? - Dorothy Parker
|