Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 2, 2024, 9:49 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Absorber Theory of Radiation
#1
Absorber Theory of Radiation
This is a theory of radiation put forward by Wheeler and Feynman in 1945 which says that radiation can also flow backward into space in such a manner as to arrive back into the source (or the emitter) if the expansion of the universe begins to reverse. These backward-moving radiation are called "advanced waves" whereas the ordinary radiations are called "retarded waves."

Do any of you physics people know anything about this? Is it really possible that stars can absorb their own light if the universe ever begins to contract?

Edit: Here's a quote from a book entitled "The Mind of God" in relation to this topic:
Quote:We never observe organized patterns of radio waves coming from the edges of the universe and converging onto radio antennae. (The technical term for outflowing waves is "retarded," whereas outflowing waves are "advanced"). If, however, the arrow of time were to reverse in the contracting phase of the universe, then the direction of radio-wave motion would also have to reverse - retarded waves would be replaced by advanced waves. In the context of Wheeler’s 'turning of the tide', this would suggest that close to the big bang all radio waves would be retarded; then, as the maximum expansion was approached, so increasing amounts of advanced waves would occur. At maximum, there would be equal advanced and retarded waves, whereas during the contracting phase advanced waves would dominate. (Davies, 54).
Reply
#2
RE: Absorber Theory of Radiation
(April 10, 2011 at 4:19 am)Rayaan Wrote: This is a theory of radiation put forward by Wheeler and Feynman in 1945 which says that radiation can also flow backward into space in such a manner as to arrive back into the source (or the emitter) if the expansion of the universe begins to reverse. These backward-moving radiation are called "advanced waves" whereas the ordinary radiations are called "retarded waves."

Do any of you physics people know anything about this? Is it really possible that stars can absorb their own light if the universe ever begins to contract?

I think the finding that the universe is not only expanding, but that said expansion is accelerating makes the contraction hypothesis problematic, at best.
'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens

"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".

- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)

"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "

- Dr. Donald Prothero
Reply
#3
RE: Absorber Theory of Radiation
In that hypothesis when space contracts time also goes backwards, so if that scenario were true then yes, it would "absorb" the radiation it once emitted.
.
Reply
#4
RE: Absorber Theory of Radiation
Not that I know physics well (if at all) rayaan but I would think that that theory was just a 'thought experiment' who knows what is going to happen...the universe IS a strange and wondrous thing...as any physicist will tell you
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5
Reply
#5
RE: Absorber Theory of Radiation
When space contracts, time will not go backwards. This would violate the second law of thermodynamics. The universe increases in entropy. Radiation is emitted from a source because that source is unstable in its current state. The natural tendency is to go to a ground stable state. Any object can absorb radiation and become unstable, but the idea of it somehow flow back toward its source is well, retarded. Don't any of you guys read Hawkins?
"On Earth as it is in Heaven, the Cosmic Roots of the Bible" available on the Amazon.
Reply
#6
RE: Absorber Theory of Radiation
(April 10, 2011 at 7:32 am)LEDO Wrote: When space contracts, time will not go backwards. This would violate the second law of thermodynamics. The universe increases in entropy. Radiation is emitted from a source because that source is unstable in its current state. The natural tendency is to go to a ground stable state. Any object can absorb radiation and become unstable, but the idea of it somehow flow back toward its source is well, retarded. Don't any of you guys read Hawkins?

Yes I do ...hence the "thought experiment" note
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5
Reply
#7
RE: Absorber Theory of Radiation
(April 10, 2011 at 7:32 am)LEDO Wrote: When space contracts, time will not go backwards. This would violate the second law of thermodynamics. The universe increases in entropy.
Time would start to slow down if the universe contracts, correct?
Reply
#8
RE: Absorber Theory of Radiation
(April 10, 2011 at 10:06 am)Welsh cake Wrote:
(April 10, 2011 at 7:32 am)LEDO Wrote: When space contracts, time will not go backwards. This would violate the second law of thermodynamics. The universe increases in entropy.
Time would start to slow down if the universe contracts, correct?

I believe that is correct.
"On Earth as it is in Heaven, the Cosmic Roots of the Bible" available on the Amazon.
Reply
#9
RE: Absorber Theory of Radiation
According to relativity rate of flow of time only changes between different frames of reference. Relative to what frame of reference does time slow down or reverse when the entire universe contracts?
Reply
#10
RE: Absorber Theory of Radiation
(April 10, 2011 at 8:57 pm)LEDO Wrote:
(April 10, 2011 at 10:06 am)Welsh cake Wrote:
(April 10, 2011 at 7:32 am)LEDO Wrote: When space contracts, time will not go backwards. This would violate the second law of thermodynamics. The universe increases in entropy.
Time would start to slow down if the universe contracts, correct?

I believe that is correct.

What make you guys believe that?


Rayaan Wrote:This is a theory of radiation put forward by Wheeler and Feynman in 1945 which says that radiation can also flow backward into space in such a manner as to arrive back into the source (or the emitter) if the expansion of the universe begins to reverse.

Not quite, actually absorber theory says nothing about the expansion of the universe. Advanced and retarded potentials are general objects in physics, not specifically related to absorber theory.

Absorber theory is a way to try to re-cast radiation theory in a way that's invariant under time-reversal. Usually when you solve the Maxwell equations for some accelerating charge, you get two solutions, one which is a function of (x - ct) and one of (x + ct). Usually, the latter is disregarded as it is considered non-causal. Doing that, however, seems to breaks the time-reversal symmetry, so Feynman and Wheeler were looking for a way to build a theory in which you don't have to arbitrarily discard a solution.

It works, and you get sensible solutions, if you impose the condition that the retarded and advanced fields are equal at every spacetime point. It isn't necessary though, from the viewpoint of calculating things you get the same answers just using retarded fields. It does make the theory look nicer because you don't have to give privilege a priori to the retarded fields.


The real influence of this idea is that it was working on this that prompted Feynman to come up with the formulation of quantum mechanics using path integrals and starting from a Lagrangian (kinetic - potential energy) instead of a Hamiltonian (kinetic + potential energy), which is the way that almost all work in quantum field theory for particle physics is done these days.
Galileo was a man of science oppressed by the irrational and superstitious. Today, he is used by the irrational and superstitious who claim they are being oppressed by science - Mark Crislip
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  What does God have in common with String Theory? LinuxGal 2 1015 December 30, 2022 at 1:45 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Teaching the Big bang theory to Preschoolers GeorgiasTelescope 5 1850 June 24, 2017 at 6:22 pm
Last Post: Fidel_Castronaut
  I wrote the first book to teach the Big Bang theory to Preschoolers! GeorgiasTelescope 0 741 June 12, 2017 at 10:17 pm
Last Post: GeorgiasTelescope
  When and Where did the Atomic Theory Come From? Rhondazvous 29 10306 May 13, 2017 at 8:31 pm
Last Post: Rev. Rye
  I have a layman's theory about quantum physics "spookiness" Won2blv 15 3206 March 5, 2017 at 11:15 am
Last Post: Won2blv
  SMASH Theory Claims to Solve 5 Major Questions of Physics AFTT47 0 1330 February 20, 2017 at 10:14 pm
Last Post: AFTT47
  Black Hole/Parallel Universe Theory Heat 9 3624 October 21, 2015 at 10:08 pm
Last Post: Heat
  Superfluid vacuum theory Psychonaut 0 1317 September 23, 2015 at 11:47 am
Last Post: Psychonaut
  Multiverse theory Heat 19 7294 September 16, 2015 at 1:05 am
Last Post: vorlon13
  Addy Pross and the General Theory of Evolution Exian 10 5357 September 23, 2014 at 11:47 pm
Last Post: Aoi Magi



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)