Random Thoughts

[ignoramus]

Rhythm, what about the helpless 11 year old girl/boy forced to obey their deranged parents and put on a belt full of explosives and walk to the market?

Do they yearn for an unlimited supply of Legos? McHappy meals maybe? . Wiggles in HD 24/7?

[Amarok]

There won't be anything recognizably immaterial about it.   The promise is sex.  Sex plain and simple (or not, if you're into not so plain and simple stuff).  Not holy union, lol.  Not ghostly satisfaction.  Sex.  A literal pile of sex.  The sexbots aren't even exclusively female.....they were built to service -every- desire, they can be and do whatever you want them to be and do.

In short, divinely facilitated orgies for services rendered.  Allah's a straight up pimp from wayback.  You have to admit, it's a hell of a sales pitch, lol.  It probably appeals to people with verboten desires (in islamo-fascist controlled or influenced areas) even moreso than the standard fare..moreso than it would some guy with an awesome wife, or who can otherwise act out his or her desires in life.  It might honestly be, as Connolly joked, that getting laid would prevent a fair bit of terrorism.

We need to invent sex bots damn it

[The Grand Nudger]

Most of them yearn for their parents approval, some have no idea what they;re doing.  I'm intimately acquainted with such children.  They do other shit a well..like moving ied markers in the dead of night, blowing peoples legs to shit in the process (and often enough their own).  I don't hold them solely to blame for their actions....I understand why they do what they do.  They're really not bad kids..and neither are their teenage versions, honestly.  I wouldn;t call them helpless, though, lol...alot of them are better shots than their parents.  

Hard target to hit too..small and fast.  

My son's and daughter's would do the same for me.  I just wouldn't ask them to.  Johhny America would blow himself up if he felt occupied as well - betting against it is a fools bet.  He'd be a hero, probably go to heaven., all the girls would want to be with him, and all the boys would want to -be- him.  Plus, we'd set his poor ass family up for life on the combat insurance payout, in addition to the increased social status.

[ignoramus]

What fucking monster would bring a kid up and strap a belt on him/her.
I cannot even begin to imagine how broken they all are over there...

[The Grand Nudger]

The human kind, desperate and with limited means to affect their situation or the world which they believe to be actively conspiring against them (and sometimes rightly so)....but simultaneously holding a surplus of children, which.... honestly.....they can barely afford, if they can afford them at all. In general...you don't see many wealthy suicide bombers, and you don't see the children of the wealthy strapping on the vests.

The same sorts of people here send their kids out to peddle meth, knowing that cops (and other dealers) have itchy trigger fingers.

[ignoramus]

So basically, everyone alive, is instinctively forced to stay alive at any cost. That's how nature works.
It's really only our arbitrary laws which decide whether we are punished for doing what we can to stay alive, naturally.

[Kernel Sohcahtoa]

I've been brushing up on logic via reading Velleman's How to Prove It.  Here's a random problem: show that ∃x(P(x)∨Q(x)) is equivalent to ∃xP(x)∨∃xQ(x). In other words, we want to show that ∃x (the existential quantifier) distributes over disjunction.

Note.

---

The hint provided in the book is to first show that ~∀x~(P(x)∨Q(x)) is equivalent to ∃x(P(x)∨Q(x)) .

~∀x~(P(x)∨Q(x)) is equivalent to ∃x~~(P(x)∨Q(x)) (quantifier negation law) which is equivalent to ∃x(P(x)∨Q(x)) (double negation law)

---

Solution

---

The statement ∃x(P(x)∨Q(x))
is equivalent to ~∀x~(P(x)∨Q(x))
which is equivalent to  ~∀x(~P(x)∧~Q(x)) Demorgan's law
which is equivalent to  ~(∀x~P(x)∧∀x~Q(x)) (∀x (the universal quantifier) distributes over ∧ (conjunction))
which is equivalent to  ~∀x~P(x)∨~∀x~Q(x) Demorgan's Laws
which is equivalent to  ∃x~~P(x)∨∃x~~Q(x) (quantifier negation law)
which is equivalent to  ∃xP(x)∨∃xQ(x) (double negation law)
 

---

[Anon2381]

What fucking monster would bring a kid up and strap a belt on him/her.
I cannot even begin to imagine how broken they all are over there...

Reminds me of the god of christians. 
1. God asks Abraham to sacrifice his son.  (If my dad asked me to murder my kid id be done with pops forever)
2. God kills his own son (great plan god, being all knowing a better option should have come up)
3. God has Jephthah kill his only daughter

Judges 11:30-40 Jephthah killed his young daughter (his only child) by burning her alive as a burnt sacrifice to the lord for he commanded it.
Psalms 137:8-9 Prayer/song of vengeance “0 daughter of Babylon, who art to be destroyed; happy shall he be that rewardeth thee as thou hast served us.  Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones.”
2 Kings 6:28-29 “And the king said unto her, What aileth thee?  And she answered, This woman said unto me, Give thy son, that we may eat him today, and we will eat my son tomorrow.  So we boiled my son, and did eat him: and I said unto her on the next day, Give thy son, that we may eat him: and she hath hid her son.”

God promises to destroy the infants of Samaria and rip open the stomachs of pregnant women.

The people of Samaria must bear their guilt, because they have rebelled against their God. They will fall by the sword; their little ones will be dashed to the ground, their pregnant women ripped open. (Hosea 13:16)

[The Valkyrie]

I have on my desk eucalyptus scented Kleenex tissues.

Looking at them, I have to wonder: Is that what a koala's fart smells like?

[ignoramus]

I've got cumin scented tissues.
Don't even ask me what they smell like!