Random Thoughts

[Foxaèr]

Life finds a way, even in darkness, and corruption can learn to thrive in the light.

[Foxaèr]

There are few things more heartbreaking than....

We've got to stop saying that, because there are lots of things that are heartbreaking.

[Angrboda]

We really are a stupid species. If God had any sense, he'd have drowned Noah and his kin with all the rest. That he didn't is probably the worst indictment of this supposed god.

[Fireball]

He moves in mysterious ways. It's what one has to say when one isn't smart enough to think past the horseshit they made up.

[Foxaèr]

He moves in mysterious ways. It's what one has to say when one isn't smart enough to think past the horseshit they made up.

He's god, we can't understand him, but let me tell you all about him anyway and how he wants you to live.

[Foxaèr]

Imagine informing people who have done exceptionally that Hey, today you were a doctor instead of using the Rockstar term.

[Woah0]

I hate the idea that I won't be remembered for anything positive after I die. But it can't be helped. My life is filled with negativity and darkness and I won't be remembered for anything good, even though I'm not all bad.

I have done my life goals so i am happy. I am just now trying to learn math, and have sex with a milky boob lady that i wanna meet. Apparently my lover is fine with me seeing other people. Though she is mainly into guy on guy thing. I guess i will see what she says about meeting with the couple i found

Oh whoops too much information.

Anyways, i did audiobooks on religious topics that i found boring, waste of time and didnt learn anything.

Now i have to use my brain on math and actually do something useful. Getting my head out of the religious aspect is painful because its just so boring and useless.
But math i atleast have a reason to learn.

[The Architect Of Fate]

What is a woman? This is a tired reframe from Conservative trolls on the internet who of course don't care about the answer and will ignore any answer given. When the obvious answer is that a woman is anyone who identifies as a woman the equally tired counter is that the definition is circular which is of course false. To be circular it would need to already assume you know what a woman is. This definition avoids that issue by making it clear that a woman is too broad a category to place any specific features and is an individualist. The definition also makes it clear this is a personal identifier or a personnel label that a person ties their own features too. So this isn't circular as the definition explains what a woman is in a way that doesn't assume the reader's own knowledge of what a woman is.

[Ahriman]

What is a woman? This is a tired reframe from Conservative trolls on the internet who of course don't care about the answer and will ignore any answer given. When the obvious answer is that a woman is anyone who identifies as a woman the equally tired counter is that the definition is circular which is of course false. To be circular it would need to already assume you know what a woman is. This definition avoids that issue by making it clear that a woman is too broad a category to place any specific features and is an individualist. The definition also makes it clear this is a personal identifier or a personnel label that a person ties their own features too. So this isn't circular as the definition explains what a woman is in a way that doesn't assume the reader's own knowledge of what a woman is.

A woman is a female human being. Nothing more, nothing less.

[The Architect Of Fate]

What is a woman? This is a tired reframe from Conservative trolls on the internet who of course don't care about the answer and will ignore any answer given. When the obvious answer is that a woman is anyone who identifies as a woman the equally tired counter is that the definition is circular which is of course false. To be circular it would need to already assume you know what a woman is. This definition avoids that issue by making it clear that a woman is too broad a category to place any specific features and is an individualist. The definition also makes it clear this is a personal identifier or a personnel label that a person ties their own features too. So this isn't circular as the definition explains what a woman is in a way that doesn't assume the reader's own knowledge of what a woman is.

A woman is a female human being. Nothing more, nothing less.

Nope it's the definition above