Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 3, 2024, 9:28 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Atheism and Ethics
RE: Atheism and Ethics
(July 27, 2024 at 10:20 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: I'm using it as a standard, and it's easily the most common standard on earth.  You think "an objective standard can be applied to it"... I have to ask, what do you think realism is saying if not that?
Ok, we are talking past each other
Harm exists. I agree. 
We can say we ought to minimise harm unnecessarily and that we can apply a standard we can morality against such actions. Wonderful
We can say that this is some sort of binding principle true regardless of what people believe.  Balderdash; no such binding principle exists, indeed there are no universals that have any kind of ethical normative force. 

There is the disagreement in an oversimplified form between a form of moral realism and someone who denies it like I do. Moral realism without that latter part and a discussion of normative force (not normative ethics) just isn’t moral realism as far as I understand it, and perhaps that is just me being ignorant
[/quote]
Reply
RE: Atheism and Ethics
We pick up and drop moral principles at our convenience no matter what the metaethical reality is. So I don't think that any moral anything is binding in that way, or that there's a "moral force" if that's what you mean. You can report a fact. You can't make people care about facts or even that fact if they otherwise do care about facts. I like to think we're persuadable - but we're also specifically incompetent...so......might be a wash, lol.

Universalism is a heavy lift for me, too. I think you'd have to believe at least one of two things to be a moral universalist. Either that the specific facts of a matter have never or can never change, or that the specific facts of a matter are not the truth making properties. The first seems demonstrably false, and the latter is anti-realist (insomuch as it rejects objectivity as a/the moral making property).
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Atheism and Ethics
@The Grand Nudger How do you define "wrongness"?
Schopenhauer Wrote:The intellect has become free, and in this state it does not even know or understand any other interest than that of truth.

Epicurus Wrote:The greatest reward of righteousness is peace of mind.

Epicurus Wrote:Don't fear god,
Don't worry about death;

What is good is easy to get,

What is terrible is easy to endure
Reply
RE: Atheism and Ethics
(July 27, 2024 at 12:37 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: We pick up and drop moral principles at our convenience no matter what the metaethical reality is.  So I don't think that any moral anything is binding in that way, or that there's a "moral force" if that's what you mean.  You can report a fact.  You can't make people care about facts or even that fact if they otherwise do care about facts.  I like to think we're persuadable - but we're also specifically incompetent...so......might be a wash, lol.  
Ok, so I mean binding in that there is an ought built into it. It isn’t just a fact about harm existing and being able to be put on a scale of most harm to least harm, it means you ought not hurt people. That ought is not something that cares about your opinion on a given act in many instances (although it could be relevant in some). That notion of morality making claims about what you should do is kind of the whole point to me of a moral realist view, it is binding but not in some mechanistic manner. That is what the error theorists or the expressivist denies.
Reply
RE: Atheism and Ethics
Sure about that? Do you deny subjective oughts?

You and I have different ideas about the point of a realist moral view. I think the point is accuracy, not binding oughts. All moral systems of any kind possess normative content. I don't have to go to realism to get that.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Atheism and Ethics
(July 27, 2024 at 8:07 pm)Disagreeable Wrote: @The Grand Nudger How do you define "wrongness"?

In a very boring and completely non novel way.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Atheism and Ethics
(July 28, 2024 at 4:22 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Sure about that?  Do you deny subjective oughts?

You and I have different ideas about the point of a realist moral view.  I think the point is accuracy, not binding oughts.  All moral systems of any kind possess normative content.  I don't have to go to realism to get that.

Fair enough
Reply
RE: Atheism and Ethics
(July 28, 2024 at 4:27 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote:
(July 27, 2024 at 8:07 pm)Disagreeable Wrote: @The Grand Nudger How do you define "wrongness"?

In a very boring and completely non novel way.

How would you respond to a Divine Command Theorist who says that God could mass kill a whole bunch of humans and it wouldn't be morally wrong because what's morally right is whatever God wills? How would you argue for your own definition of moral goodness?
Schopenhauer Wrote:The intellect has become free, and in this state it does not even know or understand any other interest than that of truth.

Epicurus Wrote:The greatest reward of righteousness is peace of mind.

Epicurus Wrote:Don't fear god,
Don't worry about death;

What is good is easy to get,

What is terrible is easy to endure
Reply
RE: Atheism and Ethics
Morality is what I say is right.

Immorality is what I say is wrong.
Reply
RE: Atheism and Ethics
(August 1, 2024 at 10:00 am)Disagreeable Wrote:
(July 28, 2024 at 4:27 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: In a very boring and completely non novel way.

How would you respond to a Divine Command Theorist who says that God could mass kill a whole bunch of humans and it wouldn't be morally wrong because what's morally right is whatever God wills? How would you argue for your own definition of moral goodness?
If the morality of his concept of a deity, falls short of the morality of an evolved ape, why would I care what he claims that deity thinks or wants. That's assuming he could demonstrate in any objective way that this deity exists of course, if he can't then he might as well be describing the moral views of villain from a comic book.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Ethics of Neutrality John 6IX Breezy 16 2292 November 20, 2023 at 8:40 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Ethics of Fashion John 6IX Breezy 60 5620 August 9, 2022 at 3:11 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  [Serious] Ethics Disagreeable 44 5549 March 23, 2022 at 7:09 pm
Last Post: deepend
  Machine Intelligence and Human Ethics BrianSoddingBoru4 24 2754 May 28, 2019 at 1:23 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  What is the point of multiple types of ethics? Macoleco 12 1564 October 2, 2018 at 12:35 pm
Last Post: robvalue
  Trolley Problem/Consistency in Ethics vulcanlogician 150 22009 January 30, 2018 at 11:01 pm
Last Post: bennyboy
  (LONG) "I Don't Know" as a Good Answer in Ethics vulcanlogician 69 11424 November 27, 2017 at 1:10 am
Last Post: vulcanlogician
  what are you ethics based on justin 50 18165 February 24, 2017 at 8:30 pm
Last Post: ignoramus
  The Compatibility Of Three Approachs To Ethics Edwardo Piet 18 3895 October 2, 2016 at 5:23 am
Last Post: Kernel Sohcahtoa
  Utilitarianism and Population Ethics Edwardo Piet 10 2115 April 24, 2016 at 3:45 am
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 9 Guest(s)