Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 17, 2025, 5:00 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Kalam Cosmological Argument
RE: The Kalam Cosmological Argument
(December 15, 2024 at 2:15 pm)Disagreeable Wrote: I don’t see how William Lane Craig gets to a being with free will.

Not to mention that free will  is logically incoherent.

As of course, is most of Lane Craig's irrational guff.
RE: The Kalam Cosmological Argument
I would say that nonexistence cannot exist by definition therefore existence is necessary. This is the conclusion of the Kalam. But it does not get to God! A necessary existence is not a god. A god is also intelligent to say the least.
Schopenhauer Wrote:The intellect has become free, and in this state it does not even know or understand any other interest than that of truth.

Epicurus Wrote:The greatest reward of righteousness is peace of mind.

Epicurus Wrote:Don't fear god,
Don't worry about death;

What is good is easy to get,

What is terrible is easy to endure
RE: The Kalam Cosmological Argument
(December 15, 2024 at 2:36 pm)Disagreeable Wrote: But it does not get to God!

Craig never met a wall he couldn't climb over with an imaginary ladder. He simply injects a bunch of presuppositions into the argument and, unsurprisingly, gets the answer he wants.

Nearly every argument for the existence of god takes a form of "god is necessary." Start with the presupposition that god exists, use this god to fill any and every gap in our knowledge, and demand that nonbelievers unwind the mess he just created. Add more presuppositions to create a much broader base of claims that must now be unwound by the nonbeliever.

It does leave the theist with one particular problem: if this is as close as you get to an answer, then we can short-circuit the whole approach by accepting the conclusion and then asking them to demonstrate how we can possibly know which god it is. To add to the challenge, I prefer to put forth god as a purely research-motivated being, who builds and dissects universes because it wants to learn more about them. Who has no interest whatsoever in us apart from our usefulness as data points. Who need not interact with worlds that are nothing more than numbers to it. That god explains our universe quite nicely. All of the magic, none of the poorly written texts to struggle with for centuries. It even explains some of the presuppositions that theists use to support the existence of god. Fine tuning? Covered. Knowledge can only exist if god does? Covered.

I got tired of chasing ghosts. I figured I would build a better ghost and ask theists to explain why their ghost makes more sense than mine.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."

-Stephen Jay Gould
RE: The Kalam Cosmological Argument
Administrator Notice
Necroclosed.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Cosmological Proof LinuxGal 53 6007 September 24, 2023 at 12:24 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Kalam LinuxGal 75 8653 December 6, 2022 at 9:17 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  The cosmological argument really needs to die already. Freedom of thought 16 4947 December 13, 2013 at 10:07 am
Last Post: Esquilax
  Leibnizian Cosmological Argument MindForgedManacle 7 2821 September 18, 2013 at 11:47 pm
Last Post: MindForgedManacle
  Questions on the Kalam Cosmological argument MindForgedManacle 10 3128 July 26, 2013 at 9:37 am
Last Post: little_monkey
  Something that can strengthen the cosmological argument? Mystic 1 1643 April 8, 2013 at 6:23 am
Last Post: A_Nony_Mouse
  Simple existence - Cosmological argument leading to God Mystic 5 3996 June 14, 2012 at 4:26 am
Last Post: genkaus



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)