Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 15, 2026, 3:59 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Kalam Cosmological Argument
RE: The Kalam Cosmological Argument
(December 15, 2024 at 2:15 pm)Disagreeable Wrote: I don’t see how William Lane Craig gets to a being with free will.

Not to mention that free will  is logically incoherent.

As of course, is most of Lane Craig's irrational guff.
RE: The Kalam Cosmological Argument
I would say that nonexistence cannot exist by definition therefore existence is necessary. This is the conclusion of the Kalam. But it does not get to God! A necessary existence is not a god. A god is also intelligent to say the least.
Schopenhauer Wrote:The intellect has become free, and in this state it does not even know or understand any other interest than that of truth.

Epicurus Wrote:The greatest reward of righteousness is peace of mind.

Epicurus Wrote:Don't fear god,
Don't worry about death;

What is good is easy to get,

What is terrible is easy to endure
RE: The Kalam Cosmological Argument
(December 15, 2024 at 2:36 pm)Disagreeable Wrote: But it does not get to God!

Craig never met a wall he couldn't climb over with an imaginary ladder. He simply injects a bunch of presuppositions into the argument and, unsurprisingly, gets the answer he wants.

Nearly every argument for the existence of god takes a form of "god is necessary." Start with the presupposition that god exists, use this god to fill any and every gap in our knowledge, and demand that nonbelievers unwind the mess he just created. Add more presuppositions to create a much broader base of claims that must now be unwound by the nonbeliever.

It does leave the theist with one particular problem: if this is as close as you get to an answer, then we can short-circuit the whole approach by accepting the conclusion and then asking them to demonstrate how we can possibly know which god it is. To add to the challenge, I prefer to put forth god as a purely research-motivated being, who builds and dissects universes because it wants to learn more about them. Who has no interest whatsoever in us apart from our usefulness as data points. Who need not interact with worlds that are nothing more than numbers to it. That god explains our universe quite nicely. All of the magic, none of the poorly written texts to struggle with for centuries. It even explains some of the presuppositions that theists use to support the existence of god. Fine tuning? Covered. Knowledge can only exist if god does? Covered.

I got tired of chasing ghosts. I figured I would build a better ghost and ask theists to explain why their ghost makes more sense than mine.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."

-Stephen Jay Gould
RE: The Kalam Cosmological Argument
Administrator Notice
Necroclosed.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  An Argument Against Determinism Disagreeable 32 5085 March 13, 2026 at 9:11 pm
Last Post: Disagreeable
  The classic ontological argument Modern Atheism 20 4864 October 3, 2024 at 12:45 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The modal ontological argument for God Disagreeable 29 7325 August 10, 2024 at 8:57 pm
Last Post: MetisX
  The Cosmological Proof LinuxGal 53 15233 September 24, 2023 at 12:24 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  The argument from degree LinuxGal 9 2581 January 1, 2023 at 12:14 am
Last Post: The Architect Of Fate
  Kalam LinuxGal 75 20332 December 6, 2022 at 9:17 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Veridican Argument for the Existence of God The Veridican 14 5332 January 16, 2022 at 4:48 pm
Last Post: brewer
  [Serious] An Argument Against Hedonistic Moral Realism SenseMaker007 25 7478 June 19, 2019 at 7:21 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  [Serious] An Argument For Ethical Egoism SenseMaker007 29 8439 June 19, 2019 at 6:30 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Argument against Intelligent Design Jrouche 27 8269 June 2, 2019 at 5:04 pm
Last Post: Pat Mustard



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)